Wicked Jester
Libsmackin'chef
Anybody else notice how atheist types are some of the most unhappy, miserable, and intolerant people on the planet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your evidence is not proof, and you fail to tie it all together. You have a lot of paths that lead to a lot of dead ends. The problem with evolutionists (like yourself) is that you are not open-minded enough to entertain the possibility that you may not have all the answers, and that your intelligence is limited to the capacity of the human brain. That's why you reject the notion that there could be a higher intelligent force in the universe that you can't take a picture of. Your own ego keeps you from thinking outside the box.A lack of physical evidence in one theory does not make YOUR theory any more legitimate by default.Given that there is actual evidence bearing in evolution and none for god, it is more reasonable to conclude that science has better explanations, and one is therefore more justified in believing science over religious claims. The simple fact that religious claims require faith in order to be believed should tell you enough, if you are being honest with yourself.
Your exactly right. You should heed your own words. Attacking science or evolution doesn't make creationism or gods any more true or real. Science doesn't rest on the fallacy of a false dichotomy, unlike many Christians. It's conclusions are supported by the evidence, in fact many times drawn from the evidence itself.
Anybody else notice how atheist types are some of the most unhappy, miserable, and intolerant people on the planet?
When you think about evolution and mystical creation, you realize what a difficult choice it is.
On one side, you have:
fossils
genetics
geology
biology
plate tectonics
radio carbon dating
on the other side, you have the imaginings of bronze age people who wore robes and sandals, many lived in caves and they didn't know to wash after wiping.
See what I mean? It's a very, very difficult choice to make.
Speaking of evolution, everyone get their flu shot? You need it every year because the virus is always evolving.
There is an interesting fact the Jews followed the Biblical ceremonial laws conerning hygiene (Read Leviticus) and were thought to be practicing witchcraft because they tended not to get infections as did the "gentile" population. So clever of these primitive bronze age people to figure out something that wasn't discovered until the late 19th century by "modern man"... The flu virus is adapting to its environment. So far, there is no proof that a virus has ever been anything but a virus or ever will be. PS> A flu shot can make one sick and may not even prevent the flu one contracts...
Your evidence is not proof, and you fail to tie it all together. You have a lot of paths that lead to a lot of dead ends. The problem with evolutionists (like yourself) is that you are not open-minded enough to entertain the possibility that you may not have all the answers, and that your intelligence is limited to the capacity of the human brain. That's why you reject the notion that there could be a higher intelligent force in the universe that you can't take a picture of. Your own ego keeps you from thinking outside the box.A lack of physical evidence in one theory does not make YOUR theory any more legitimate by default.
Your exactly right. You should heed your own words. Attacking science or evolution doesn't make creationism or gods any more true or real. Science doesn't rest on the fallacy of a false dichotomy, unlike many Christians. It's conclusions are supported by the evidence, in fact many times drawn from the evidence itself.
Really?Anybo, dy else notice how atheist types are some of the most unhappy, miserable, and intolerant people on the planet?
No, that would be religious fanatics. Think Pat Robertson, Bin Laden and Jerry Falwell to name a few past and present.
Really?Anybo, dy else notice how atheist types are some of the most unhappy, miserable, and intolerant people on the planet?
No, that would be religious fanatics. Think Pat Robertson, Bin Laden and Jerry Falwell to name a few past and present.
How about Pol Pot, Stalin, Kim Jung ll, Jeffrey Dahmer, Jim Jones, Idi Amin, Mao, Mussollini, Alfred Kinzey, Napoleon, Than Shwe, Charles Manson, and on and on and on?
Really?No, that would be religious fanatics. Think Pat Robertson, Bin Laden and Jerry Falwell to name a few past and present.
How about Pol Pot, Stalin, Kim Jung ll, Jeffrey Dahmer, Jim Jones, Idi Amin, Mao, Mussollini, Alfred Kinzey, Napoleon, Than Shwe, Charles Manson, and on and on and on?
The difference is, theists do evil things in the explicit name of religion (hating gays, minorities, or sinners) while atheists never have done something in the name of a lack of belief in god.
Sorry, but then these same institutions should be helping in any research to prove Creationism is correct and encouraging thinking outside the establishment box --- just as many Christians did long-ago for secular scientists. Keep the playing field equal and not exclusive or dogmatic. This is what will promote true learning and not mere memorization.
In order to do that Creationists would have to play by the same rules as Evolutionists, but they don't. Any sort of "proof" they have has been debunked by normal scientific inquiry. They refuse to acknowledge it, however, and keep repeating the same stories over and over again, as if they were unadulterated fact.
because creationism isn't science.
science is science.
i hope you're no longer confused.
Views and opinions are not science. Evolution is founded on interpretation of data and not actually seen repeatable events. As such, there are various interpretations that can be applied. But no one can say with absolute certainty this is how the events occurred --- one must speculate or accept divine revelation. True scientific method demands full observation & repeatablity.
so because there are unknown variables, you'd equate something that is entirely faith-based and which has zero scientific basis?
Really?
How about Pol Pot, Stalin, Kim Jung ll, Jeffrey Dahmer, Jim Jones, Idi Amin, Mao, Mussollini, Alfred Kinzey, Napoleon, Than Shwe, Charles Manson, and on and on and on?
The difference is, theists do evil things in the explicit name of religion (hating gays, minorities, or sinners) while atheists never have done something in the name of a lack of belief in god.
You might be surprised:
10 People Who Give Atheism a Bad*Name - Listverse
Criticism of atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Views and opinions are not science. Evolution is founded on interpretation of data and not actually seen repeatable events. As such, there are various interpretations that can be applied. But no one can say with absolute certainty this is how the events occurred --- one must speculate or accept divine revelation. True scientific method demands full observation & repeatablity.
so because there are unknown variables, you'd equate something that is entirely faith-based and which has zero scientific basis?
It's done all the time with the evolutionary theory.
A lack of physical evidence in one theory does not make YOUR theory any more legitimate by default.So, because there are so many unknown variables I see more probability that man is mistaken with regard his theories, and many other things man does.
Given that there is actual evidence bearing in evolution and none for god, it is more reasonable to conclude that science has better explanations, and one is therefore more justified in believing science over religious claims. The simple fact that religious claims require faith in order to be believed should tell you enough, if you are being honest with yourself.
Anybody else notice how atheist types are some of the most unhappy, miserable, and intolerant people on the planet?
Your evidence is not proof, and you fail to tie it all together. You have a lot of paths that lead to a lot of dead ends. The problem with evolutionists (like yourself) is that you are not open-minded enough to entertain the possibility that you may not have all the answers, and that your intelligence is limited to the capacity of the human brain. That's why you reject the notion that there could be a higher intelligent force in the universe that you can't take a picture of. Your own ego keeps you from thinking outside the box.A lack of physical evidence in one theory does not make YOUR theory any more legitimate by default.
Your exactly right. You should heed your own words. Attacking science or evolution doesn't make creationism or gods any more true or real. Science doesn't rest on the fallacy of a false dichotomy, unlike many Christians. It's conclusions are supported by the evidence, in fact many times drawn from the evidence itself.
so because there are unknown variables, you'd equate something that is entirely faith-based and which has zero scientific basis?
It's done all the time with the evolutionary theory.
Yet another comment from the intellectually crippled.
Really?Anybo, dy else notice how atheist types are some of the most unhappy, miserable, and intolerant people on the planet?
No, that would be religious fanatics. Think Pat Robertson, Bin Laden and Jerry Falwell to name a few past and present.
How about Pol Pot, Stalin, Kim Jung ll, Jeffrey Dahmer, Jim Jones, Idi Amin, Mao, Mussollini, Alfred Kinzey, Napoleon, Than Shwe, Charles Manson, and on and on and on?