Why do men..... ?

[Bonzi]

I have no scientific evidence to back it up, but in my experience smaller tits have more sensitive nipples. Which is what makes them more fun. I knew a woman once......well.....

... I know very well...

 

[WinterBorn]

Bing a C (B cup if I get to my idea weight) I get sick and tired of hearing about big tits.

Pisses me off. Men that are into that are better off not speaking to me..... <pout!>

Those men are simply fools or overgrown children. I'll let you pick.

Tits are over-rated often anyway. Size there shouldn't be an issue. But if a guy says he only wants big tits, tell him you only want 10 inches or more. That should settle him down.

Like I said - it's about the intangibles... the game..... the flirt.... the build up....

Exactly!!! If you start right, and take your time, you can build a heat that will burn!

 

[ChrisL]

but I guess that is pretty normal....

Very much so.

But then again, a lot of women really make the <ahem> slender build work too.

Can they ever be TOO big?

Nevaaaaaah!!!

are you sure? (highly disappointed...)
View attachment 54297

Oh yuck! I'm blind now. Thanks.

 

[Bonzi]

but I guess that is pretty normal....

Very much so.

But then again, a lot of women really make the <ahem> slender build work too.

Can they ever be TOO big?

Nevaaaaaah!!!

are you sure? (highly disappointed...)
View attachment 54297

Oh yuck! I'm blind now. Thanks.

there is such a thing as too big.... if you are a normal man....

 

[mudwhistle]

Very much so.

But then again, a lot of women really make the <ahem> slender build work too.

Can they ever be TOO big?

Nevaaaaaah!!!

are you sure? (highly disappointed...)
View attachment 54297

Oh yuck! I'm blind now. Thanks.

there is such a thing as too big.... if you are a normal man....

Just kidding

Actually my idea of a perfect woman is big nipples and a curvaceous butt. Tits are optional.

Oh, and she's gotta be smart enough to carry a conversation.......and rides a Harley......or a horse.

 

[WinterBorn]

Can they ever be TOO big?

Nevaaaaaah!!!

are you sure? (highly disappointed...)
View attachment 54297

Oh yuck! I'm blind now. Thanks.

there is such a thing as too big.... if you are a normal man....

Just kidding

Actually my idea of a perfect woman is big nipples and a curvaceous butt. Tits are optional.

Oh, and she's gotta be smart enough to carry a conversation.......and rides a Harley......or a horse.

Good description! Especially the part about being smart enough to carry on a conversation.

 

[ChrisL]

Nevaaaaaah!!!

are you sure? (highly disappointed...)
View attachment 54297

Oh yuck! I'm blind now. Thanks.

there is such a thing as too big.... if you are a normal man....

Just kidding

Actually my idea of a perfect woman is big nipples and a curvaceous butt. Tits are optional.

Oh, and she's gotta be smart enough to carry a conversation.......and rides a Harley......or a horse.

Good description! Especially the part about being smart enough to carry on a conversation.

Most people are smart enough to carry on a conversation, I think. Of course, this place is another story entirely. Lol. I keep saying, it's websites like this that tend to attract the strangest of the strange and the craziest of the crazy.

 

[mudwhistle]

are you sure? (highly disappointed...)
View attachment 54297

Oh yuck! I'm blind now. Thanks.

there is such a thing as too big.... if you are a normal man....

Just kidding

Actually my idea of a perfect woman is big nipples and a curvaceous butt. Tits are optional.

Oh, and she's gotta be smart enough to carry a conversation.......and rides a Harley......or a horse.

Good description! Especially the part about being smart enough to carry on a conversation.

Most people are smart enough to carry on a conversation, I think. Of course, this place is another story entirely. Lol. I keep saying, it's websites like this that tend to attract the strangest of the strange and the craziest of the crazy.

Alot of people are strange......but they often become even stranger when they know nobody's gonna tell everyone they know how weird they are thanks to anonymity, which allows them to be stupid without repercussions.

 

[danielpalos]

No, I am claiming that capital does not matter when in love, if that was true I would not be married for 35 years, that is why your fallacy is wrong and based on a false premise and not truism.

you must mean, ceteris paribus. since you are committing a fallacy of composition otherwise.

And if you are going to start looking for fallacies of composition, you would do well to start with your own posts. You have committed that fallacy too many times for me to even mention. But we can start with your insistence that all the women I slept with did so because of my money.

dear, they are your straw men and red herrings. i Only state money is always a factor under Any form of Capitalism.

You openly stated that my money was the reason women slept with me. That is not my red herring or strawman. It is what YOU said.

Good luck getting a straight answer, he is dishonest so he won't directly answer any question. It is an old grade school game.

simply appealing to ignorance isn't any better, for adults.

 

[danielpalos]

we "talk" on the internet all the time. clarity in communication is not my problem.

You really do have an issue with reading comprehension, don't you? My comment had nothing to do with clarity of communication. It had to do with you calling talking to a woman "work".

You called it work, dear; i merely stated i argue with them all the time; i know wo-men are usually just full of fallacy by custom and habit. i said i don't have to work any harder than bad boys for poon.

No. That is not what you said.

You said: "all you are claiming; is that it is more "work", without capital being involved.". I merely questioned you calling it work to talk with an attractive woman.

yes; it is what i have also said. i already know you don't understand the capital concepts involved.

Since we are not discussing a business transaction, I am not worried about capital concepts. These are social interactions.

under our form of Capitalism; it influences every Thing.

 

[danielpalos]

you must mean, ceteris paribus. since you are committing a fallacy of composition otherwise.

And if you are going to start looking for fallacies of composition, you would do well to start with your own posts. You have committed that fallacy too many times for me to even mention. But we can start with your insistence that all the women I slept with did so because of my money.

dear, they are your straw men and red herrings. i Only state money is always a factor under Any form of Capitalism.

You openly stated that my money was the reason women slept with me. That is not my red herring or strawman. It is what YOU said.

capital under any form of Capitalism, dear. that always applies.

A social interaction between two people is not necessarily a capitalistic system. In fact, it usually is not.

you cannot separate capitalism from our political-economy; it is what rights in private property also accomplish.

 

[WinterBorn]

You really do have an issue with reading comprehension, don't you? My comment had nothing to do with clarity of communication. It had to do with you calling talking to a woman "work".

You called it work, dear; i merely stated i argue with them all the time; i know wo-men are usually just full of fallacy by custom and habit. i said i don't have to work any harder than bad boys for poon.

No. That is not what you said.

You said: "all you are claiming; is that it is more "work", without capital being involved.". I merely questioned you calling it work to talk with an attractive woman.

yes; it is what i have also said. i already know you don't understand the capital concepts involved.

Since we are not discussing a business transaction, I am not worried about capital concepts. These are social interactions.

under our form of Capitalism; it influences every Thing.

I might concede that money does influence virtually everything. But often the influence is very, very minor.

 

[WinterBorn]

And if you are going to start looking for fallacies of composition, you would do well to start with your own posts. You have committed that fallacy too many times for me to even mention. But we can start with your insistence that all the women I slept with did so because of my money.

dear, they are your straw men and red herrings. i Only state money is always a factor under Any form of Capitalism.

You openly stated that my money was the reason women slept with me. That is not my red herring or strawman. It is what YOU said.

capital under any form of Capitalism, dear. that always applies.

A social interaction between two people is not necessarily a capitalistic system. In fact, it usually is not.

you cannot separate capitalism from our political-economy; it is what rights in private property also accomplish.

We are talking about two people having a personal interaction that has nothing to do with business or capitalism. Yes, it is separate.

 

[danielpalos]

You called it work, dear; i merely stated i argue with them all the time; i know wo-men are usually just full of fallacy by custom and habit. i said i don't have to work any harder than bad boys for poon.

No. That is not what you said.

You said: "all you are claiming; is that it is more "work", without capital being involved.". I merely questioned you calling it work to talk with an attractive woman.

yes; it is what i have also said. i already know you don't understand the capital concepts involved.

Since we are not discussing a business transaction, I am not worried about capital concepts. These are social interactions.

under our form of Capitalism; it influences every Thing.

I might concede that money does influence virtually everything. But often the influence is very, very minor.

it depends; there have been studies regarding women preferring professional men over blue collar workers.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, they are your straw men and red herrings. i Only state money is always a factor under Any form of Capitalism.

You openly stated that my money was the reason women slept with me. That is not my red herring or strawman. It is what YOU said.

capital under any form of Capitalism, dear. that always applies.

A social interaction between two people is not necessarily a capitalistic system. In fact, it usually is not.

you cannot separate capitalism from our political-economy; it is what rights in private property also accomplish.

We are talking about two people having a personal interaction that has nothing to do with business or capitalism. Yes, it is separate.

no, it isn't. consider how much different your life with be with more or less income.

 

[WinterBorn]

No. That is not what you said.

You said: "all you are claiming; is that it is more "work", without capital being involved.". I merely questioned you calling it work to talk with an attractive woman.

yes; it is what i have also said. i already know you don't understand the capital concepts involved.

Since we are not discussing a business transaction, I am not worried about capital concepts. These are social interactions.

under our form of Capitalism; it influences every Thing.

I might concede that money does influence virtually everything. But often the influence is very, very minor.

it depends; there have been studies regarding women preferring professional men over blue collar workers.

That is simple biological imperative. Women instinctively look for the best provider for the family. I have no doubt that more women prefer a professional man. But it is far from all they look for, and certainly not for all women.

You openly stated that my money was the reason women slept with me. That is not my red herring or strawman. It is what YOU said.

capital under any form of Capitalism, dear. that always applies.

A social interaction between two people is not necessarily a capitalistic system. In fact, it usually is not.

you cannot separate capitalism from our political-economy; it is what rights in private property also accomplish.

We are talking about two people having a personal interaction that has nothing to do with business or capitalism. Yes, it is separate.

no, it isn't. consider how much different your life with be with more or less income.

Sure. But we are not discussing no income. We are discussing whether all women want a wealthy or rich guy. It is not about the money. That is not to say a homeless man is a candidate. Just that money is not the reason for the connection. That the man is self-supporting is enough.

 

[Papageorgio]

you must mean, ceteris paribus. since you are committing a fallacy of composition otherwise.

And if you are going to start looking for fallacies of composition, you would do well to start with your own posts. You have committed that fallacy too many times for me to even mention. But we can start with your insistence that all the women I slept with did so because of my money.

dear, they are your straw men and red herrings. i Only state money is always a factor under Any form of Capitalism.

You openly stated that my money was the reason women slept with me. That is not my red herring or strawman. It is what YOU said.

Good luck getting a straight answer, he is dishonest so he won't directly answer any question. It is an old grade school game.

simply appealing to ignorance isn't any better, for adults.

Let me know when you become an adult.

 

[ChrisL]

Oh yuck! I'm blind now. Thanks.

there is such a thing as too big.... if you are a normal man....

Just kidding

Actually my idea of a perfect woman is big nipples and a curvaceous butt. Tits are optional.

Oh, and she's gotta be smart enough to carry a conversation.......and rides a Harley......or a horse.

Good description! Especially the part about being smart enough to carry on a conversation.

Most people are smart enough to carry on a conversation, I think. Of course, this place is another story entirely. Lol. I keep saying, it's websites like this that tend to attract the strangest of the strange and the craziest of the crazy.

Alot of people are strange......but they often become even stranger when they know nobody's gonna tell everyone they know how weird they are thanks to anonymity, which allows them to be stupid without repercussions.

True. Some of the people who are like my mother's or grandmother's age and the way they conduct themselves is kind of surprising though. Lol.

 

[ChrisL]

yes; it is what i have also said. i already know you don't understand the capital concepts involved.

Since we are not discussing a business transaction, I am not worried about capital concepts. These are social interactions.

under our form of Capitalism; it influences every Thing.

I might concede that money does influence virtually everything. But often the influence is very, very minor.

it depends; there have been studies regarding women preferring professional men over blue collar workers.

That is simple biological imperative. Women instinctively look for the best provider for the family. I have no doubt that more women prefer a professional man. But it is far from all they look for, and certainly not for all women.

capital under any form of Capitalism, dear. that always applies.

A social interaction between two people is not necessarily a capitalistic system. In fact, it usually is not.

you cannot separate capitalism from our political-economy; it is what rights in private property also accomplish.

We are talking about two people having a personal interaction that has nothing to do with business or capitalism. Yes, it is separate.

no, it isn't. consider how much different your life with be with more or less income.

Sure. But we are not discussing no income. We are discussing whether all women want a wealthy or rich guy. It is not about the money. That is not to say a homeless man is a candidate. Just that money is not the reason for the connection. That the man is self-supporting is enough.

I couldn't be with a guy simply because he was rich. I would have to at LEAST like him. I don't think I could have any kind of relationship with someone I didn't even like. I don't know how some women can do that. Weird.

Anyways, I think the point is that a person (male or female) has to have SOMETHING going for them in order to get the girl or the guy. You cannot be a complete and utter loser with nothing going for you and expect men or women to throw themselves at you!

 

[Bonzi]

which allows them to be stupid without repercussions

..... or just ones that may not bother you - but no one is every truly anonymous or safe from repercussions. that's an illusion.....