LOki
The Yaweh of Mischief
- Mar 26, 2006
- 4,084
- 359
- 85
Do you have even one example?The problem with your argument (aside from taking up such an offensive manner) is that most of science is based on things which we have never had evidence of.
You don't get out much, do you?This could be why scientific advancements have slowed to almost a halt recently, . . .
Just making shit up? Neato!:thup2:. . . because one side doesn't want to advance science and the scientific supporters have just decided to prove anything new one way or the other is not worth it because 'there is no evidence.'
I'm not so sure that this is precisely true, but it still certainly doesn't support the assertion that "most of science is based on things which we have never had evidence of."Most of our medical science was based on things which the only evidence they had was dead bodies.
Does it?
So?Our computer tech was all pipe dreams with no place to even start except gears and levers.
Bold statement. Ever been to a chemsitry class?Chemistry is dependent on exploring things without evidence because we can't see most of it.
Congradulations. You've finally hit the level of dumbfuck.Dismissing something just because there is no evidence is not the scientific method. True scientists do not dismiss anything until there is fact that denies it's existence, not the other way around for a reason.
Have a fucking reminder from THE POST YOU'RE REPLYING TO:
"So you see KittenKoder, if you're suggesting that I'm saying God doesn't exist because there's no evidence of His existence, then you're just barking up the wrong fucking tree."