Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

[danielpalos]

I ceded nothing I stated fact

You stated no solution to his question and that is a fact

There is no natural rate of inefficiency and the general welfare clause is not a socialist clause

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

They have equal protection of the law which does not translate to a right to other peoples money


There is no such thing as an at will employment state,

Socialism has consistently failed world wide and correct nothing.

There is no such natural rate of inefficiency.

Based on all of your falsehoods you have offered no solution and the claim that you have offered one is a lie.

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

Never had an argument, I had a question that you could not answer, all you have are excuses and blame, even liberals have solutions, why not you?

i gave you the proposed solution; stop trolling. are Trying to become an Ogre?

 

[danielpalos]

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

The part you cited is irrelevant and does not address your manufactured definitions.

Nothing in the constitution supports your stupid and ignorant claim

You have been proven to be a liar and fool

you need an actual argument. i already know, You cannot be Simon in this argument.

Social-ism is about the Power to faithfully execute our federal doctrine.

No it is not

Socialism is about government seizure and ownership of the means of production. You do not get to dream up new and idiotic meanings for words.

I do not need an argument when your claims are based on lies which you dream up out of thin air which is exactly what you are doing

lol. appeals to ignorance are All you have, right wingers. Simon said so.

eminent domain fulfills that requirement, for the social and public Good.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

They have equal protection of the law which does not translate to a right to other peoples money


There is no such thing as an at will employment state,

Socialism has consistently failed world wide and correct nothing.

There is no such natural rate of inefficiency.

Based on all of your falsehoods you have offered no solution and the claim that you have offered one is a lie.

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

Never had an argument, I had a question that you could not answer, all you have are excuses and blame, even liberals have solutions, why not you?

i gave you the proposed solution; stop trolling. are Trying to become an Ogre?

You are a liar and the absolute fact is that you offered no solution.

Just as you lied like a coward about socialism and the constitution furthermore you continue to childishly lie about it after being proven wrong

Now answer the question and explain how to solve the problems created by left wingers

 

[Soupnazi630]

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

The part you cited is irrelevant and does not address your manufactured definitions.

Nothing in the constitution supports your stupid and ignorant claim

You have been proven to be a liar and fool

you need an actual argument. i already know, You cannot be Simon in this argument.

Social-ism is about the Power to faithfully execute our federal doctrine.

No it is not

Socialism is about government seizure and ownership of the means of production. You do not get to dream up new and idiotic meanings for words.

I do not need an argument when your claims are based on lies which you dream up out of thin air which is exactly what you are doing

lol. appeals to ignorance are All you have, right wingers. Simon said so.

eminent domain fulfills that requirement, for the social and public Good.

No one has appealed to ignorance and it is not right or left wing.

It is objective neutral fact that you are ignorant and a liar.

Eminent domain does no such thing.

It is established truth we have no socialism. The constitution is not a social co tract and you have offered no solutions when asked.

Stop lying and answer

 

[danielpalos]

They have equal protection of the law which does not translate to a right to other peoples money


There is no such thing as an at will employment state,

Socialism has consistently failed world wide and correct nothing.

There is no such natural rate of inefficiency.

Based on all of your falsehoods you have offered no solution and the claim that you have offered one is a lie.

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

Never had an argument, I had a question that you could not answer, all you have are excuses and blame, even liberals have solutions, why not you?

i gave you the proposed solution; stop trolling. are Trying to become an Ogre?

You are a liar and the absolute fact is that you offered no solution.

Just as you lied like a coward about socialism and the constitution furthermore you continue to childishly lie about it after being proven wrong

Now answer the question and explain how to solve the problems created by left wingers

i guess i need to resort to the fewest fallacies, then and practice what i preach, simply for the sake of the moral high ground.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

 

[danielpalos]

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

The part you cited is irrelevant and does not address your manufactured definitions.

Nothing in the constitution supports your stupid and ignorant claim

You have been proven to be a liar and fool

you need an actual argument. i already know, You cannot be Simon in this argument.

Social-ism is about the Power to faithfully execute our federal doctrine.

No it is not

Socialism is about government seizure and ownership of the means of production. You do not get to dream up new and idiotic meanings for words.

I do not need an argument when your claims are based on lies which you dream up out of thin air which is exactly what you are doing

lol. appeals to ignorance are All you have, right wingers. Simon said so.

eminent domain fulfills that requirement, for the social and public Good.

No one has appealed to ignorance and it is not right or left wing.

It is objective neutral fact that you are ignorant and a liar.

Eminent domain does no such thing.

It is established truth we have no socialism. The constitution is not a social co tract and you have offered no solutions when asked.

Stop lying and answer

yes, it does. you have to Explain why it doesn't not say it doesn't; when I already know, You are not Simon.

 

[Markle]

yes, it does. you have to Explain why it doesn't not say it doesn't; when I already know, You are not Simon.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, it does. you have to Explain why it doesn't not say it doesn't; when I already know, You are not Simon.

you can be "superior" if you get it the first time.

 

[Ame®icano]

Social order can be enforced by any form of government not just socialist governments

I have proven you are wrong ignorant and uneducated

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

Where does it say that "power to tax" is a "social" power?

 

[danielpalos]

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

Where does it say that "power to tax" is a "social" power?

where does it say it is a capital power?

 

[Ame®icano]

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Where does it say it's "social" contract?

 

[Ame®icano]

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

You haven't. You cited your perception of what you think the Constitution says, while in reality, no such thing exist.

 

[dblack]

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

You haven't. You cited your perception of what you think the Constitution says, while in reality, no such thing exist.

He's just trolling you. He'll repeat the same nonsense, over and over, ad infinitum, as long as it gets him the negative attention he craves.

 

[Ame®icano]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

No you have not you only ran away from the question and are now lying.

As usual

Thanks for ceding the point and the argument, if you have Any fallacy for rebuttal.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

I ceded nothing I stated fact

You stated no solution to his question and that is a fact

There is no natural rate of inefficiency and the general welfare clause is not a socialist clause

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

What exactly this gibberish means?

 

[Ame®icano]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed. Why are left wing states in such a mess? What is the left solutions that they implemented? Why are they not obviously working? Maybe they should adopt socialist Venezuela's solutions, oh wait they aren't working their either. Seems the left has no solutions, just poverty, crime, homelessness and excuses.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States,

not fantastical right wing gossip.

Unemployed do get unemployment compensation for a period of time they earned it by working.

Simply not having job, and refusing to work does not qualify you for compensation.

 

[Ame®icano]

Thanks for ceding the point and the argument, if you have Any fallacy for rebuttal.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

I ceded nothing I stated fact

You stated no solution to his question and that is a fact

There is no natural rate of inefficiency and the general welfare clause is not a socialist clause

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

They have equal protection of the law which does not translate to a right to other peoples money


There is no such thing as an at will employment state,

Socialism has consistently failed world wide and correct nothing.

There is no such natural rate of inefficiency.

Based on all of your falsehoods you have offered no solution and the claim that you have offered one is a lie.

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

You had no point, and no argument.

Shouting communist propaganda is neither one of two.

 

[Ame®icano]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed. Why are left wing states in such a mess? What is the left solutions that they implemented? Why are they not obviously working? Maybe they should adopt socialist Venezuela's solutions, oh wait they aren't working their either. Seems the left has no solutions, just poverty, crime, homelessness and excuses.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States,

not fantastical right wing gossip.

More excuses I see from you. Why is it all you have is excuses and blame? You realize that California, Washington and Oregon have all left wingers running them, they can implement your idea and yet choose not to, maybe it is because your idea sucks. Why doesn't the left have solutions for homelessness, poverty, crime? You claim solutions and all you offer is excuses and blame.

We have a federal doctrine regarding this Union issue.

We?

Cite it.

 

[Ame®icano]

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

They have equal protection of the law which does not translate to a right to other peoples money


There is no such thing as an at will employment state,

Socialism has consistently failed world wide and correct nothing.

There is no such natural rate of inefficiency.

Based on all of your falsehoods you have offered no solution and the claim that you have offered one is a lie.

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

Never had an argument, I had a question that you could not answer, all you have are excuses and blame, even liberals have solutions, why not you?

i gave you the proposed solution; stop trolling. are Trying to become an Ogre?

Can you point to one place where where your solution is implemented and actually work?

 

[Ame®icano]

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

You haven't. You cited your perception of what you think the Constitution says, while in reality, no such thing exist.

He's just trolling you. He'll repeat the same nonsense, over and over, ad infinitum, as long as it gets him the negative attention he craves.

I know.

He must've been government educated. Probably not here...

 

[danielpalos]

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Where does it say it's "social" contract?

Socialism deals with social Powers not Capital powers and vice versa.