Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

[Soupnazi630]

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

Never had an argument, I had a question that you could not answer, all you have are excuses and blame, even liberals have solutions, why not you?

i gave you the proposed solution; stop trolling. are Trying to become an Ogre?

You are a liar and the absolute fact is that you offered no solution.

Just as you lied like a coward about socialism and the constitution furthermore you continue to childishly lie about it after being proven wrong

Now answer the question and explain how to solve the problems created by left wingers

i guess i need to resort to the fewest fallacies, then and practice what i preach, simply for the sake of the moral high ground.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

You resorted to the most fallacies which have already been proven to be fallacies in earlier posts.

You are a dishonest liar at the bottom of the moral ground and that has been proven.

You have offered no solution you have only jumbled up some word salad.

Answer the question and state a solution and keep in mind you have been schooled and now understand that socialism is NOT government and the constitution is not a contract. Furthermore there is no such thing as a natural rate of inefficiency.

Explain yourself and answer the question

 

[Soupnazi630]

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Where does it say it's "social" contract?

Socialism deals with social Powers not Capital powers and vice versa.

There are NO social powers and socialism strictly requires government power,

There is no social contract and our government is not socialist like most governments.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

You haven't. You cited your perception of what you think the Constitution says, while in reality, no such thing exist.

You obviously weren't paying attention dear.

The Congress shall have Power

 

[danielpalos]

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

You haven't. You cited your perception of what you think the Constitution says, while in reality, no such thing exist.

He's just trolling you. He'll repeat the same nonsense, over and over, ad infinitum, as long as it gets him the negative attention he craves.

ogres like You are worse.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The part you cited is irrelevant and does not address your manufactured definitions.

Nothing in the constitution supports your stupid and ignorant claim

You have been proven to be a liar and fool

you need an actual argument. i already know, You cannot be Simon in this argument.

Social-ism is about the Power to faithfully execute our federal doctrine.

No it is not

Socialism is about government seizure and ownership of the means of production. You do not get to dream up new and idiotic meanings for words.

I do not need an argument when your claims are based on lies which you dream up out of thin air which is exactly what you are doing

lol. appeals to ignorance are All you have, right wingers. Simon said so.

eminent domain fulfills that requirement, for the social and public Good.

No one has appealed to ignorance and it is not right or left wing.

It is objective neutral fact that you are ignorant and a liar.

Eminent domain does no such thing.

It is established truth we have no socialism. The constitution is not a social co tract and you have offered no solutions when asked.

Stop lying and answer

yes, it does. you have to Explain why it doesn't not say it doesn't; when I already know, You are not Simon.

No it does not and the burden of proof is strictly on you.

You know you are wrong and have been defeated.

You only lie about it because you are childish and believe repeating a false statement will make it believable

 

[danielpalos]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

No you have not you only ran away from the question and are now lying.

As usual

Thanks for ceding the point and the argument, if you have Any fallacy for rebuttal.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

I ceded nothing I stated fact

You stated no solution to his question and that is a fact

There is no natural rate of inefficiency and the general welfare clause is not a socialist clause

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

What exactly this gibberish means?

Employment is at the will of either party in an at-will employment State.

...still with me so far?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

You haven't. You cited your perception of what you think the Constitution says, while in reality, no such thing exist.

You obviously weren't paying attention dear.

The Congress shall have Power

I did pay attention and corrected you on your lies boy

 

[danielpalos]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed. Why are left wing states in such a mess? What is the left solutions that they implemented? Why are they not obviously working? Maybe they should adopt socialist Venezuela's solutions, oh wait they aren't working their either. Seems the left has no solutions, just poverty, crime, homelessness and excuses.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States,

not fantastical right wing gossip.

Unemployed do get unemployment compensation for a period of time they earned it by working.

Simply not having job, and refusing to work does not qualify you for compensation.

That is not equal protection of the laws regarding employment at the will of either party.

 

[danielpalos]

I ceded nothing I stated fact

You stated no solution to his question and that is a fact

There is no natural rate of inefficiency and the general welfare clause is not a socialist clause

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

They have equal protection of the law which does not translate to a right to other peoples money


There is no such thing as an at will employment state,

Socialism has consistently failed world wide and correct nothing.

There is no such natural rate of inefficiency.

Based on all of your falsehoods you have offered no solution and the claim that you have offered one is a lie.

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

You had no point, and no argument.

Shouting communist propaganda is neither one of two.

lol. i gainsay your contention.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No you have not you only ran away from the question and are now lying.

As usual

Thanks for ceding the point and the argument, if you have Any fallacy for rebuttal.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

I ceded nothing I stated fact

You stated no solution to his question and that is a fact

There is no natural rate of inefficiency and the general welfare clause is not a socialist clause

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

What exactly this gibberish means?

Employment is at the will of either party in an at-will employment State.

...still with me so far?

Employment is at will as a human right and no power in the constitution exists to change that fact. There is no such thing as a not at will employment state nor will there ever be.

Your fallacies are mounting so answer the question and offer a solution which you have not done so far

 

[Soupnazi630]

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

They have equal protection of the law which does not translate to a right to other peoples money


There is no such thing as an at will employment state,

Socialism has consistently failed world wide and correct nothing.

There is no such natural rate of inefficiency.

Based on all of your falsehoods you have offered no solution and the claim that you have offered one is a lie.

40 plus pages he claims he has solutions and no excuses, it is just the opposite, he has excuses and no solutions. If he is the left's best he is screwed.

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

You had no point, and no argument.

Shouting communist propaganda is neither one of two.

lol. i gainsay your contention.

No you do not you simply willfully ignore facts and lie about it.


You have no argument

 

[Soupnazi630]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed. Why are left wing states in such a mess? What is the left solutions that they implemented? Why are they not obviously working? Maybe they should adopt socialist Venezuela's solutions, oh wait they aren't working their either. Seems the left has no solutions, just poverty, crime, homelessness and excuses.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States,

not fantastical right wing gossip.

Unemployed do get unemployment compensation for a period of time they earned it by working.

Simply not having job, and refusing to work does not qualify you for compensation.

That is not equal protection of the laws regarding employment at the will of either party.

Yes it is

 

[danielpalos]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed. Why are left wing states in such a mess? What is the left solutions that they implemented? Why are they not obviously working? Maybe they should adopt socialist Venezuela's solutions, oh wait they aren't working their either. Seems the left has no solutions, just poverty, crime, homelessness and excuses.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States,

not fantastical right wing gossip.

More excuses I see from you. Why is it all you have is excuses and blame? You realize that California, Washington and Oregon have all left wingers running them, they can implement your idea and yet choose not to, maybe it is because your idea sucks. Why doesn't the left have solutions for homelessness, poverty, crime? You claim solutions and all you offer is excuses and blame.

We have a federal doctrine regarding this Union issue.

We?

Cite it.

only infidels, protestants, rebels, and renegades have a problem with it.

The federal doctrine regarding employment at the will of either party.

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."--At-will employment - Wikipedia

 

[danielpalos]

thank y'all for ceding the point and the argument you didn't have and couldn't come up with.

Never had an argument, I had a question that you could not answer, all you have are excuses and blame, even liberals have solutions, why not you?

i gave you the proposed solution; stop trolling. are Trying to become an Ogre?

You are a liar and the absolute fact is that you offered no solution.

Just as you lied like a coward about socialism and the constitution furthermore you continue to childishly lie about it after being proven wrong

Now answer the question and explain how to solve the problems created by left wingers

i guess i need to resort to the fewest fallacies, then and practice what i preach, simply for the sake of the moral high ground.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

You resorted to the most fallacies which have already been proven to be fallacies in earlier posts.

You are a dishonest liar at the bottom of the moral ground and that has been proven.

You have offered no solution you have only jumbled up some word salad.

Answer the question and state a solution and keep in mind you have been schooled and now understand that socialism is NOT government and the constitution is not a contract. Furthermore there is no such thing as a natural rate of inefficiency.

Explain yourself and answer the question

lol. nothing but gossip, dear? you need valid arguments for rebuttal not ad hominems alleging i am wrong and you are right.

 

[Soupnazi630]

First you claimed solutions. I bring up a disaster in left wing ran governments and now you switch to proposed, which failed in Finland. So you purposed solution has already failed. Why are left wing states in such a mess? What is the left solutions that they implemented? Why are they not obviously working? Maybe they should adopt socialist Venezuela's solutions, oh wait they aren't working their either. Seems the left has no solutions, just poverty, crime, homelessness and excuses.

Unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States,

not fantastical right wing gossip.

More excuses I see from you. Why is it all you have is excuses and blame? You realize that California, Washington and Oregon have all left wingers running them, they can implement your idea and yet choose not to, maybe it is because your idea sucks. Why doesn't the left have solutions for homelessness, poverty, crime? You claim solutions and all you offer is excuses and blame.

We have a federal doctrine regarding this Union issue.

We?

Cite it.

only infidels, protestants, rebels, and renegades have a problem with it.

The federal doctrine regarding employment at the will of either party.

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."--At-will employment - Wikipedia

It is not a union issue and citing wiki si not citing a doctrine and only ignorant dumbfucks like you believe in the false crap you post

 

[danielpalos]

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Where does it say it's "social" contract?

Socialism deals with social Powers not Capital powers and vice versa.

There are NO social powers and socialism strictly requires government power,

There is no social contract and our government is not socialist like most governments.

There must be social powers dealing with society at large under Any form of Government. government is socialism.

only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

you need an actual argument. i already know, You cannot be Simon in this argument.

Social-ism is about the Power to faithfully execute our federal doctrine.

No it is not

Socialism is about government seizure and ownership of the means of production. You do not get to dream up new and idiotic meanings for words.

I do not need an argument when your claims are based on lies which you dream up out of thin air which is exactly what you are doing

lol. appeals to ignorance are All you have, right wingers. Simon said so.

eminent domain fulfills that requirement, for the social and public Good.

No one has appealed to ignorance and it is not right or left wing.

It is objective neutral fact that you are ignorant and a liar.

Eminent domain does no such thing.

It is established truth we have no socialism. The constitution is not a social co tract and you have offered no solutions when asked.

Stop lying and answer

yes, it does. you have to Explain why it doesn't not say it doesn't; when I already know, You are not Simon.

No it does not and the burden of proof is strictly on you.

You know you are wrong and have been defeated.

You only lie about it because you are childish and believe repeating a false statement will make it believable

no. you lie more. i am the "honest Injeun" on this one, paler shade of red, guy.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Never had an argument, I had a question that you could not answer, all you have are excuses and blame, even liberals have solutions, why not you?

i gave you the proposed solution; stop trolling. are Trying to become an Ogre?

You are a liar and the absolute fact is that you offered no solution.

Just as you lied like a coward about socialism and the constitution furthermore you continue to childishly lie about it after being proven wrong

Now answer the question and explain how to solve the problems created by left wingers

i guess i need to resort to the fewest fallacies, then and practice what i preach, simply for the sake of the moral high ground.

The proposed solution is equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Socialism can correct for capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency via our general welfare clause.

You resorted to the most fallacies which have already been proven to be fallacies in earlier posts.

You are a dishonest liar at the bottom of the moral ground and that has been proven.

You have offered no solution you have only jumbled up some word salad.

Answer the question and state a solution and keep in mind you have been schooled and now understand that socialism is NOT government and the constitution is not a contract. Furthermore there is no such thing as a natural rate of inefficiency.

Explain yourself and answer the question

lol. nothing but gossip, dear? you need valid arguments for rebuttal not ad hominems alleging i am wrong and you are right.

Yes you have nothing but gossip

I have stated facts destroying you bitch You know and everyone knows you are lying and the facts i have posted prove you wrong

You are a liar and that is massively proven and you know it

Now stop running like a coward and answer

 

[Soupnazi630]

No it is not

Socialism is about government seizure and ownership of the means of production. You do not get to dream up new and idiotic meanings for words.

I do not need an argument when your claims are based on lies which you dream up out of thin air which is exactly what you are doing

lol. appeals to ignorance are All you have, right wingers. Simon said so.

eminent domain fulfills that requirement, for the social and public Good.

No one has appealed to ignorance and it is not right or left wing.

It is objective neutral fact that you are ignorant and a liar.

Eminent domain does no such thing.

It is established truth we have no socialism. The constitution is not a social co tract and you have offered no solutions when asked.

Stop lying and answer

yes, it does. you have to Explain why it doesn't not say it doesn't; when I already know, You are not Simon.

No it does not and the burden of proof is strictly on you.

You know you are wrong and have been defeated.

You only lie about it because you are childish and believe repeating a false statement will make it believable

no. you lie more. i am the "honest Injeun" on this one, paler shade of red, guy.

I have stated facts not lies.

You are a yellow coward

 

[danielpalos]

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.

Social power is a concept and nothing more it does not exist.

There is no social contract and we have no socialism here because socialism is strictly a specific form of government not just ANY government

I cited our Constitution. stop making up stories, story teller.

You haven't. You cited your perception of what you think the Constitution says, while in reality, no such thing exist.

You obviously weren't paying attention dear.

The Congress shall have Power

I did pay attention and corrected you on your lies boy

What lies, littler boy? Capitalism Has no Power only voluntary social transactions between the parties involved.