Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That there are profoundly ignorant individuals like you who refuse to see anything antisemitic about those collaborating with groups commited to genocide does not make ME the dishonest one.Okay. But the ideas that underpin it are accepted by many who are neither anti-Semitic, nor terrorists. So using your fact as a muzzle or to discount discussion of the ideas is dishonest.
To you, of course not. But to a rational person whose mind is not addled by religion or political fetish, supporting a boycott because that person feels that Israel is committing human rights abuses is not the basis of genocide.your comment makes no sense at all
it’s paranoid fantasy that HAMAS has stated it’s goal is to drive Israel out of existence?That is paranoid fantasy. I can't reason with someone who easily believes such embarrassing nonsense.
A non sequitur lie you made up on the spot to soothe yourself.That there are profoundly ignorant individuals like you who refuse to see anything antisemitic about those collaborating with groups commited to genocide does not make ME the dishonest one.
Stupid non sequitur. Ignored.it’s paranoid fantasy that HAMAS has stated it’s goal is to drive Israel out of existence?
your comment makes no sense at all
No lies on my part, ignorant boy.A non sequitur lie you made up on the spot to soothe yourself.
I don't refuse to see anti-semitism. I know it runs rampant all over the planet. I am just not so stupid and simple to accuse every person of supporting this boycott of being anti-semitic. Frankly, neither are the paid liars who make a living saying it IS always anti-semitic. They butter their bread with this false idea. With your emotional reactions and willingness to over simplify complicated ideas.
If your proposition were TRUE. it ain't. The "boycott" started out as aTo you, of course not. But to a rational person whose mind is not addled by religion or political fetish, supporting a boycott because that person feels that Israel is committing human rights abuses is not the basis of genocide.
Oh, I am sorry. I forgot that most American adults are not well educated and likely do not know what a non sequitur is.No lies on my part, ignorant boy.
Where are all the boycotts of the Muslim and Arab countries that do so much worse? Why is the sole target the tiny little Jewish state, which would be the sole refuge of Jews should antisemitism rise to an intolerable level?To you, of course not. But to a rational person whose mind is not addled by religion or political fetish, supporting a boycott because that person feels that Israel is committing human rights abuses is not the basis of genocide.
Who is starving? Some bold claims you are making, there.The "boycott" started out as a
starvation siege and so continues.
BDS doesn't bother because all it has done is provide Israel with the ability to show off their products and services for export.Where are all the boycotts of the Muslim and Arab countries that do so much worse? Why is the sole target the tiny little Jewish state, which would be the sole refuge of Jews should antisemitism rise to an intolerable level?
The double standards being applied - in which Jews are condemned for what others do, and are who not condemned - is one of the definitions of antisemitism.
Seems like a reasonable observation to me. A CONTROLLING POLITICALStupid non sequitur. Ignored.
That is a valid question. Easier to get Americans to "boycott" something, when it doesn't affect them much.Where are all the boycotts of the Muslim and Arab countries that do so much worse?
Well, the Trump political movement also attracted some of the most vile white supremacists and neo nazies to it’s support. Does that mean it is anti Semitic and racist?
True, South Africa was the last major boycott movement I recall. However other countries have had and currently have government sanctions forbidding trade and other things (which is a basically a boycott).
I agree that Israel tends to get outsized attention compared to say, Myanmar, who’s human rights atrocities are far far worse.
But I support boycotts. They a way of non violently pressuring for change.
Those are arguments that have been rehashed ad nauseum in the IP forum.
You already have with your baiting OP. Was your intent otherwise?
Are you a Trump voter? Why are willing to March shoulder to shoulder with people yelling “Jews will not replace us”
Nope. You stil are not quite grasping the meaning of "non sequitur".A CONTROLLING POLITICAL
PARTY that advocates genocide seems like a "stupid non sequitur" to you.
Interesting you ask------perhaps you heard of the "ARAB OWNED"Who is starving? Some bold claims you are making, there.
It's beyond "fun" It is an idiot's joke. From where do you get your information about "killing all muslims" and "Nuking Hamas"------yourNope. You stil are not quite grasping the meaning of "non sequitur".
here, let me illustrate:
So, you want to kill all the Muslims, then? Why do you want to nuke Hamas? Why do you not care about civilian deaths?
Isn't this fun?
I have a difficult time understanding why a bunch of Semites can't get along in a good, Semitic fashion and manner in modern times.First, before liberals rush in to claim that BDS is not anti-Jew but merely anti-Israel, know that BDS has indeed been recognized as an antisemitic movement. (Links below.)
Now, given that BDS provides an outlet for antisemites to express their Jew-hatred as well as actively promoting it, the question is: Why do liberal Jews support a major antisemitic movement?
My theory is they, like all liberals, divide people (as groups) into “oppressed” and “oppressors.” That is why you see liberals race in to defend blacks, gays, illegal aliens (and also go soft on criminals), all of whom they see oppressed. And so too with the Palestinians (who elected the terrorist Islamic group HAMAS to lead them). Then, on the other side, liberals oppose those they see as “oppressors” - successful business owners, white males, and Christians. Into this group they out Israelis - an advanced and successful group.
Therein lies the dilemma. Do liberals Jews march against their own people, advancing and supporting antisemitism, because a group of them are viewed - mostly by libersls - as oppressors? The answer is YES: their liberalism trumps their Judaism.
BDS Israel boycott group is anti-Semitic, says US
The pro-Palestinian movement rejects the move, saying it stands against "all forms of racism".www.bbc.com
How about prior to 1910? I mean, you do realize the earth was not created in 1948, right?that neighborhood--
prior to 1948 was JEWISH OWNED BY PROPERTY PURCHASE. Y
How about prior to 1910? I mean, you do realize the earth was not created in 1948, right?
See, that's the problem, here. As long as Israel is a jewish State (and make no mistake, it is that), and as long as too many people accept the silly mythology of the iron age, NONE of what you are saying will matter. fundamentalists on both sides will ALWAYS find a reason to justify their own aggression and hatred.
And before you go on one of your patented rants accusing me of anti-semitism: Know that I take Israel's side in these conflicts, because they are at the very least making the attempt to be a Western-style democracy and to live in peace with their neighbors.
