Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, what we have and what most countries have is a combination of capitalism and socialism. The debate is where the ideal balance is. I personally prefer that we shift more towards an actual free market.
Socialism in its purest form doesn't tend to work well, as demonstrated by Venezuela.
The best that can be expected in that direction is a country like Norway, which is still very capitalist in most markets but heavily socializes certain amenities and oil & gas.
Communism is a non-starter, since it has killed more people than fascism.
Then instead of burying us in more of your Rhetorical Diarrhea produce a copy of such an agreement.Wrong.
Russia could easily have hung onto the Ukraine.
That is the whole point.
Gorbachev clearly had to have negotiated with the Ukraine, and from all accounts, the Ukraine agreed to never join any alliance hostile to Russia.
Still talking out of your ass.Wrong.
Socialism requires some coordination through government, but not capitalism.
Capitalism has nothing at all to do with government in a democratic republic.
And Venezuela was nothing at all like socialism.
It was a corruption by the wealthy elite, which is an oligarchy, not socialism.
And since it was profit motivated, that is more capitalism.
Wrong.Yes there is.
When the US created the UN in 1945, Congress ratified the UN charter in to US law, and it makes all war illegal unless attacked first, or if the UN votes for it.
Yes he would have because he was the true communist.Nonsense. If Stalin was any sort of politico, he would not have had Trotsky murdered, or any of the real communists.
Communism is the means under which all families live, so can't be theft.
A dictator can't be a member of the proletariat,
That is a linguistic contradiction.
You are absolutely talking out of your ass here.And Venezuela was nothing at all like socialism.
Wrong.
They are always public.
No it is not obvious. There was no issue with missiles nor any belligerent actions from Ukraine.
So like America where whites are inferior citizens that can be gunned down and arrested without charge for protesting?
Then why were so many of them starved to death, murdered outright or consigned to slow death in the gulags?Communism is the means under which all families live, so can't be theft.
Wrong I am totally right and you are lying.Wrong.
Profit comes from having currency.
And stealing it is a time honored tradition among imperial colonialists like the US.
And your diatribe against Marx is silly.
He was a proponent of the French Revolution to democracy from the monarchy.
Marx never preached tyranny, but actually Libertarian Anarchy, where the "state would whither away".
He wanted no coercive government at all.
An idealist, but not racist or tyrant.
You are just totally wrong.
Neither of those operations had anything to do with a treaty.Oh, for example, for example, when Reagan sent Oliver North to exchange weapons for money to sent to the Contras in Nicaragua, that was all PUBLIC?
The "varying level of rights" had only to do with being taught in your native language in school.Teaching a language does not make Nazis, but having varying levels of rights based on what language is native to you, IS NAZI.
Every system beyond the commune level has an elite. In fact, socialist systems tend to have far less economic mobility, which results in an elite that is much harder to join than in a capitalist one. Wealth disparity is sometimes much lower, but that doesn't mean much when economic mobility is also lower.Wrong.
Socialism requires some coordination through government, but not capitalism.
Capitalism has nothing at all to do with government in a democratic republic.
And Venezuela was nothing at all like socialism.
It was a corruption by the wealthy elite, which is an oligarchy, not socialism.
And since it was profit motivated, that is more capitalism.
Mitch McConnell daughter??Let's not forget that Cocaine Mitch had his daughter on the Burisma board too. The Swamp has used Ukraine to embezzle foreign aid for decades. Hillary set the scheme up back when she was SOS under Barry da Fairy.
Still talking out of your ass, they were each nations under the umbrella of the "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics".Wrong.
The USSR was supreme over the individual members, who were states, not separate countries.
The US states used to be separate countries, until they joined the United States federation.
Then they no longer were separate countries.
They could no longer declare war, negotiate treaties, etc.
Same with the Ukraine.
It lost it independence when it joined the USSR.
It must have taken the world's longest sewer snake to pull that one out of your ass.Let's not forget that Cocaine Mitch had his daughter on the Burisma board too. The Swamp has used Ukraine to embezzle foreign aid for decades. Hillary set the scheme up back when she was SOS under Barry da Fairy.
The terrorists land forces that were overtaking the country that were being attacked by Q'daffi's air force, the force US and coalition aircraft were there to stop.
You'd do well to shut up and quit proving to everyone just what an idiot you are.
The Forty countryes that joined us in a coalition against Saddam did so for many reasons, since it was GB's planes most frequently being targeted and shot at while enforcing the NFZ and the fact they are the 2nd Largest military power in the free world I think that question answers itself.
The invasion and removal of Saddam were authorized by numerous UN Resolutions beginning with UN Res 1441.
And isn't it true that Baghdad Bob was right that the US was lying about Iraqi WMD, the US was committing war crimes, the invasion was illegal, the US murdered half a million innocent Iraqi civilians, the US illegally tortured POWs in Bagrham, etc.?
Are you trying to imply that Baghdad Bob was wrong in some way?
The US has always been on the wrong side, deliberately starting wars to invade or install dictators, like with Chaig Kai Shek in China, Syngman Rhee in Korea, Diem in Vietnam, Samosa in Nicaragua, Pinochet in Chile, Batista in Cuba, the Shah in Iran, etc.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Muhammad_Saeed_al-Sahhaf-5a2538df89eacc0037f0e1ff.png)
Yes he would have because he was the true communist.
COmmunisk is not a voluntary agreement such as how families live.
Yes a dictator can be a member of the proletariate as Marx stated.
You are absolutely talking out of your ass here.
Until the socialists took over it was one of the richest and most successful countries in the Western Hemisphere then just like Cuba as soon as "La Revolution" removed the rightful gov't things went to shit for them economically.
