Why Hasn’t Pelosi’s Attacker Been Released on California’s $0 Bail Yet?

How fucking stupid can you be. No cash bail does not mean that you get out because of your status. You get out without bail if you are considered to not be a flight risk or a danger to the public. Do you really think that this guy will be released?
Did you not see the link in the OP, Simp?
 
Have they released the 911 call, the police body cams, and the Pelosi home security video yet?
Soon.

The Capitol Police also have video footage of DePape breaking into the house.

Inside the command center for the U.S. Capitol Police, a handful of officers were going through their routines early Friday morning, cycling through live feeds from the department’s 1,800 cameras used to monitor the nearby Capitol complex as well as some points beyond, when an officer stopped. On a screen showing a darkened street nearly 3,000 miles away, police lights were flashing outside the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), officials say.

The officer in D.C. quickly pulled up additional camera angles from around Pelosi’s home and began to backtrack, watching recordings from the minutes before San Francisco police arrived. There, on camera, was a man with a hammer, breaking a glass panel and entering the speaker’s home, according to three people familiar with how Capitol Police learned of the break-in and who have been briefed on or viewed the video themselves.

[snip]

The Capitol Police first installed cameras around Pelosi’s home more than eight years ago; she has an around-the-clock security detail; and for many months after the attacks of Jan. 6, 2021, a San Francisco police cruiser sat outside her home day and night. But hours after Pelosi left San Francisco last week and returned to D.C., much of the security left with her, and officers in Washington stopped continuously monitoring video feeds outside her house.

 
It takes days for him to memorize what his story is. If he screws up, Arkanscide
 
Holy Cow,

Marcus Eriz, a southern California man charged with the murder of a 6-year-old boy in a road rage incident, was ordered held without bail Friday.

Really? Held without bail does NOT mean released on no bail. No bail here simply meant he wasn't going to be released because he was still considered a danger.

What exactly is being argued here with this link? You are pissed that a guy who killed a kid was held in prison as opposed to getting bail, be it $0 or $1,00,000?

Did you google "no bail" and just post the first link you found without reading it or considering what it was actually saying? No one else understood this either?

California's "No bail" here meant the guy was NOT getting out of prison. What exactly is the problem here?
 
You people can do nothing more than beat out a moroni, knee jerk reaction to omething that you associate with Democrats but really don't understand. Yes shit happens, mistakes have been made. People who should not be on the street have gotten out. But when done right it works. It is working in New Jersey.

When it works right, it means that crazy shit bags like DePape cannot buy their way out, but the poor, young mother who is busted for shoplifting baby food and diapers out of desparation will not have to sit in jail awaiting the disposition of her case while the kids are sent into the foster care system. Please give me a sign that you are atleast bright enough to understand that much.

The sad bullshit "struggling mother" trope is just that, sad bullshit. Most of these people are lazy opportunistic fucks or drug addicts. Your prog mind thinks if they were "just given the chance" they would turn it around just shows how naive or stupid you are.

Ask people in Camden and Newark how things are going, not Short Hills.
 
It assumes no such thing. Where are you getting that hit from.? Stop lsitening to the voices in your head and try to get in touch with reality. The fact is- and it is not an assumption- that all people who commit crimes do not need to be locked up awaiting trial. The fact is , that when done right, the people who get out without bail rarely commit new crimes and usually show up in court. The fact is that a cash bail sytem is racist and classist and it results in poor people rotting in jail while dangerous people buy their way out. Are you going to try to claim that those out on cash bail do not commit new crimes?

The ones that are stealing because thats all they can do need to be locked up to stop them from stealing again. And then you morons extend it to violent crimes and some wife beater gets out and murders his wife, and you don't fucking care. One death is meaningless as long as you try to fix the criminals, the real victims in your addled mind.
 
The ones that are stealing because thats all they can do need to be locked up to stop them from stealing again. And then you morons extend it to violent crimes and some wife beater gets out and murders his wife, and you don't fucking care. One death is meaningless as long as you try to fix the criminals, the real victims in your addled mind.
You have NO FUCING IDEA what you're blathetring about.
 
You have NO FUCING IDEA what you're blathetring about.

You are mad because I know exactly what I am talking about.

All of this bullshit is because of the progressive idea that the criminals are the real victims, and their victims are extended victims of the real enemy, "the system".
 
You are mad because I know exactly what I am talking about.

All of this bullshit is because of the progressive idea that the criminals are the real victims, and their victims are extended victims of the real enemy, "the system".
I'm not mad. I am disgusted with the stupidity. You people think that the answer to crime is to lock up low level, non violent offenders before they have even been convicted. You think that it makes you sound tough on crime when in reality it just makes you soiund stupid

Its obvious that you just use the issue to score cheep political points but thats all that it accomplishes. The streets are not safer, lives that might have been salvaged are ruined, and the taxpayers pay-in many ways. There are no winners . Everyone is a victim
 
Last edited:
So I guess we will get no explanation as to why the guy in the OP getting no bail is a bad thing?
 
I'm not mad. I am disgusted with the stupidity. You people think that the answer to crime is to lock up low level, non violent offenders before they have even been convicted. You think that it makes you sound tough on crime when in reality it just makes you soiund stupid

Its obvious that you just use the issue to score cheep political points but thats all that it accomplishes. The streets are not safer, lives that might have been salvaged are ruined, and the taxpayers pay-in many ways

It makes common sense to hold people who can't even make the most basic bail, because it shows they won't be able to support themselves while waiting for trial from a crime they committed to support themself.

And a lot of these are violent crimes plead down to non violent crimes, and people end up dead or hurt because of it. AND. YOU. DONT. GIVE. A. SHIT.

Just martyrs for your future socialist utopia where the only prisoners are political ones.

Tell the person shoved onto a fucking subway track that they wouldn't have been safer if the serial assaulter wasn't in jail waiting trial.
 
It makes common sense to hold people who can't even make the most basic bail, because it shows they won't be able to support themselves while waiting for trial from a crime they committed to support themself.

And a lot of these are violent crimes plead down to non violent crimes, and people end up dead or hurt because of it. AND. YOU. DONT. GIVE. A. SHIT.

Just martyrs for your future socialist utopia where the only prisoners are political ones.

Tell the person shoved onto a fucking subway track that they wouldn't have been safer if the serial assaulter wasn't in jail waiting trial.
It only makes sense to someone who has no sense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top