Why haven't the authorities taken down the Pelosi-attacker's website?

If you have any information to add to this thread, by all means help yourself. Otherwise, fuck off.

You're on my ignore list, so I can't read any of your vile comments. But reading other members having to respond to your comments is tiresome.
Keep crying about it you Safe Space needing bitch. 😂

I've answered the question of your OP, it's not my fault you're too much of a coward to read it.
 
Now that I've looked him up a bit, the guy sounds like some of our White Wing posters here. Starting to make a lot more sense why JGalt and his ilk are desperate to scrub his existence on the internet.


https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/28/politics/pelosi-attack-suspect-conspiracy-theories-invs/index.html

DePape also posted links to YouTube videos with titles like "Democrat FARCE Commission to Investigate January 6th Capitol Riot COLLAPSES in Congress!!!" and "Global Elites Plan To Take Control Of YOUR Money! (Revealed)"

Two days after former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of killing George Floyd, DePape wrote that the trial was "a modern lynching," falsely indicating that Floyd died of a drug overdose.

He also posted content about the "Great Reset"-- the sprawling conspiracy theory that global elites are using coronavirus to usher in a new world order in which they gain more power and oppress the masses. And he complained that politicians making promises to try to win votes "are offering you bribes in exchange for your further enslavement."
 
Keep crying about it you Safe Space needing bitch. 😂

I've answered the question of your OP, it's not my fault you're too much of a coward to read it.

The case is being jointly investigated by San Francisco police, the FBI, U.S. Capitol Police and federal and local prosecutors. When federal authorities are involved, all instances of the subject's social media are usually taken down within an hour, sometimes within minutes.

Why is this not the case with Depape's website?
 
The case is being jointly investigated by San Francisco police, the FBI, U.S. Capitol Police and federal and local prosecutors. When federal authorities are involved, all instances of the subject's social media are usually taken down within an hour, sometimes within minutes.
Are they?
 
Now that I've looked him up a bit, the guy sounds like some of our White Wing posters here. Starting to make a lot more sense why JGalt and his ilk are desperate to scrub his existence on the internet.


https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/28/politics/pelosi-attack-suspect-conspiracy-theories-invs/index.html

DePape also posted links to YouTube videos with titles like "Democrat FARCE Commission to Investigate January 6th Capitol Riot COLLAPSES in Congress!!!" and "Global Elites Plan To Take Control Of YOUR Money! (Revealed)"

Two days after former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of killing George Floyd, DePape wrote that the trial was "a modern lynching," falsely indicating that Floyd died of a drug overdose.

He also posted content about the "Great Reset"-- the sprawling conspiracy theory that global elites are using coronavirus to usher in a new world order in which they gain more power and oppress the masses. And he complained that politicians making promises to try to win votes "are offering you bribes in exchange for your further enslavement."

You're not posting anything that I don't already know. I've been through his blog, virtually searching it with a fine toothed comb. And you're not answering the question:

The case is being jointly investigated by San Francisco police, the FBI, U.S. Capitol Police and federal and local prosecutors. When federal authorities are involved, all instances of the subject's social media are usually taken down within an hour, sometimes within minutes.

Why is this not the case with Depape's website?
 
You're not posting anything that I don't already know. I've been through his blog, virtually searching it with a fine toothed comb. And you're not answering the question:
That doesn't reek of desperation... :lmao:
The case is being jointly investigated by San Francisco police, the FBI, U.S. Capitol Police and federal and local prosecutors. When federal authorities are involved, all instances of the subject's social media are usually taken down within an hour, sometimes within minutes.

Why is this not the case with Depape's website?
This continues to be your claim but all you've done is repeat it, what you haven't done is provide any evidence that it's real.
Of course they are. Do you need a link?
Sure. I'd love to see you provide links to websites you claim have been taken down. 😄
 
That doesn't reek of desperation... :lmao:

This continues to be your claim but all you've done is repeat it, what you haven't done is provide any evidence that it's real.

Sure. I'd love to see you provide links to websites you claim have been taken down. 😄

Sounds reasonable. Then we're just gonna have to go with the assumption that this was not a "false flag." This was an 82 year old closeted gay, wealthy and lonely drug addict doing what they do when their wives are out of town. And it spun out of control.

Unless you have some other explanation. :laughing0301:
 
When a crime is committed the authorities invariably take down the suspect's social media. But David DePape's frenlyfrens.com website is still up, even though it's being mentioned in the news stories right now. Does anyone else think this is curious?

+"frenlyfrens.com" at DuckDuckGo
You'd complain and call "con-spiracy" if it was taken down. It was left up for you, you ungrateful MAGAt! :heehee:
 
Sounds reasonable. Then we're just gonna have to go with the assumption that this was not a "false flag." This was an 82 year old closeted gay, wealthy and lonely drug addict doing what they do when their wives are out of town. And it spun out of control.

Unless you have some other explanation. :laughing0301:
I came here to educate you on why the authorities don't have the right to remove speech content. You and yours are the ones obsessed with gay sex. 😂
 
I came here to educate you on why the authorities don't have the right to remove speech content. You and yours are the ones obsessed with gay sex. 😂

Why was the 911 call a "welfare check" and not a burglary in progress?

Was the suspect let into the house by permission?

Was he was there for gay sex or delivering drugs, or both?

Why did the suspect strike Pelosi only after the cops got there?

Who was the other occupant in Paul Pelosi's car when he crashed it?

Is it possible it was the same guy? Or another drug dealer? Or another gay escort?
 
Why was the 911 call a "welfare check" and not a burglary in progress?
Aliens?
Was the suspect let into the house by permission?
Big Foot?
Was he was there for gay sex or delivering drugs, or both?
Lizard people?
Why did the suspect strike Pelosi only after the cops got there?
Chem Trails?
Who was the other occupant in Paul Pelosi's car when he crashed it?
JFK Jr. in a skin suit?
Is it possible it was the same guy? Or another drug dealer? Or another gay escort?
You lookin for a hook up for one or both?
 
Aliens?

Big Foot?

Lizard people?

Chem Trails?

JFK Jr. in a skin suit?

You lookin for a hook up for one or both?

For a bunch of people who call yourselves "progressives", you sure seem to be lacking in curiosity, open-mindedness, and the ability to question what you hear.

You can go back on ignore now, don't bother responding.
 
Democrats have no capacity for shame or embarassment. It gives them a huge advantage over normal people.

It reminds me of the book (not the movie), Starship Troopers. In one scene, the hero is about to be dropped onto a hostile planet in a pod, where - if he survives the drop - he will be expected to fight thousands of giant bugs. But he is not afraid - he is unable to be afraid due to drugs supplied by his unit. It made him a far better fighter, since fear and panic could not affect his motivation or decision making.

Imagine that your husband has been in a violent domestic altercation with a homosexual prostitute and you have the audacity to blame your political opponents. The capacity for shame and embarassment must have been extinguished long ago. An ordinary woman could not do that.
 
Now that I've looked him up a bit, the guy sounds like some of our White Wing posters here. Starting to make a lot more sense why JGalt and his ilk are desperate to scrub his existence on the internet.


https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/28/politics/pelosi-attack-suspect-conspiracy-theories-invs/index.html

DePape also posted links to YouTube videos with titles like "Democrat FARCE Commission to Investigate January 6th Capitol Riot COLLAPSES in Congress!!!" and "Global Elites Plan To Take Control Of YOUR Money! (Revealed)"

Two days after former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of killing George Floyd, DePape wrote that the trial was "a modern lynching," falsely indicating that Floyd died of a drug overdose.

He also posted content about the "Great Reset"-- the sprawling conspiracy theory that global elites are using coronavirus to usher in a new world order in which they gain more power and oppress the masses. And he complained that politicians making promises to try to win votes "are offering you bribes in exchange for your further enslavement."
Yes CNN doesn’t provide screenshots or links to these supposed right wing posts of his.
 
According to the left media......

Concerned about censorship is "rightwing extremist"
Be against the war in Ukraine is "rightwing extremist"
Apparently being an anti-Semite is rightwing... not sure where that is coming from
Being angry at Google is rightwing extremism
 
For a bunch of people who call yourselves "progressives", you sure seem to be lacking in curiosity, open-mindedness, and the ability to question what you hear.

You can go back on ignore now, don't bother responding.
My response isn't just for you Soy Boy, we are having a public conversation and I love explaining to the public what fucking morons and pussies you all are.

As for the particulars of this incident, I don't really care. What people get up to in their personal lives is something I couldn't give less of a shit about and I have no idea what it has to do with progressivism. I care about policy, not whether or not Pelosi's husband was roughed up while wearing a gimp suit and doing blow off a chimpanzees ass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top