Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
It can be made compatible. Why do you hate polygamy ?
It could be. We could, state by state, create a patchwork of brand new precedent to answer questions that are unique to polygamy. It would take decades, but its totally possible. However, the incompatibility with our marriage laws would be a logical reason to not recognize plural marriages if we chose to.
Where with same sex marriage, no such imcompatibility exists. Nor has existed since 2 person marriage was recognized as a joining of equals. The moment men and women were recognized as equals in a marriage.....same sex marriage was inevitable. As all the same rules apply.
Here is from PA just to pick a state that is kinda red/and blue
Marriage License in Pennsylvania
The Marriage License Bureau is part of the Clerk of the Orhpans' Court and Register of Wills. The following are the legal requirements for obtaining a marriage license in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
When to apply:
Where to apply:
- Minimum of three business days and/or up to a maximum of60 days prior to the marriage ceremony.
- There is a three (business) day waiting period for issuance of the actual license.
What is required:
- Office of the Clerk of Orphans' Court of any County of Pennsylvania.
- Both applicants must be present to apply.
- Applicants must be 18 years of age in order to apply for a marriage license. This rule applies to both male and female applicants. Applicants between 16-18 years of age must be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian to provide written consent to the marriage. Applicants under 16 years of age must have both the written approval of a judge of theOrphans' Court Division of the Common Pleas AND a parent or legal guardian given written consent.
- Social Security Numbers are REQUIRED at the time of application.
- Drivers license or Photo ID for applicants
- Visas are required for citizens of another country
it would seem that there is no direct prohibition against polygamy except where it says "both." Interestingly enough if that were to be the argument then where it says the rule applies to male and female applicant that would seem to indicate a ban on gay marriage. So no there is no ban that would stand the SCOTUS standard concerning polygamy.
Pennsylvania it is. So riddle me this: there's a 3 person marriage. One person wants out. Does that mean that the marriage of all 3 is dissolved? Or just the party leaving?
Using Pennsylvania marriage law, answer that question.
You'll find you can't. As Pennsylvania marriage law has no instance in their marriage law where one member of a marriage is divorced while the other is still married. And thus no answers to questions that arise under such a situation
Simple, same as is done today, all parties agree, which in this case would be 2 as one against one.
There is no instance of 3 person marriage today under our law, nor is it possible in 2 person marriage for 1 person to leave the union and the other still be married.
The situation is physically impossible in 2 person marriage. Consequently, our laws have no answers for questions that arise under situations impossible under our law. How then could they do the 'same as is done today' for something that isn't done today?
Are you starting to see why you're only proving my point?
Prior to say 2 years ago there were no provisions for gay marriage in any laws. And for all but a handful of states there is still no provision so I am not even sure I understand you point. In this brave new world I am not sure what difference it would make if one side remained married. Look at it this ways, say there were two women and a man married. The man sues for divorces the other two, who pay alimony? That would be a problem. I wonder how that is going to work in gay marriages when they divorce.
That all said the SCOTUS ruled exactly like I thought although they had to do some mental gymnastics to do so.
All I wish now if for the victory laps to stop, the color lights at the WH celebrating sodomy to turn white again and the left to STFU already.