Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you really think she has a case?
It's a tough call whether or not to isolate suspected Ebola infected people. No doubt the left has convinced themselves that involuntary medical isolation is illegal if ordered by a republican and fine if it is done in a democrat state or by the democrat party dominated federal government.
She has no case.
Your problem seems to be you are trying to make a criminal complaint over a public health issue. 'Probable cause', 'imprisonment'. These are terms applied in criminal proceedings. No crime was committed and no one is suggesting there was.She has no case.
So you think the government had probable cause to hold her for several days?
It's a tough call whether or not to isolate suspected Ebola infected people. No doubt the left has convinced themselves that involuntary medical isolation is illegal if ordered by a republican and fine if it is done in a democrat state or by the democrat party dominated federal government.
The partisanship goes all the way around. Cinos seem all too happy to violate people's rights if it's ordered by a Republican Governor, especially if it's seen as a way to slam Obama. It's ridiculous and appalling. Nobody wants to look at the real matters behind it all. Either do it illegally, or don't do it at all. It's like there's no middle ground for rational minds.
She should be kept in quarantine until there is no threat of contagion. There is no civil right to spread a deadly disease.
Spoken like a true left wing imbecile. There is already no threat of contagion. More importantly, there is no legal grounds to imprison her. And no grounds for a liberty loving people to tolerate such an imprisonment.
It's a tough call whether or not to isolate suspected Ebola infected people. No doubt the left has convinced themselves that involuntary medical isolation is illegal if ordered by a republican and fine if it is done in a democrat state or by the democrat party dominated federal government.
The partisanship goes all the way around. Cinos seem all too happy to violate people's rights if it's ordered by a Republican Governor, especially if it's seen as a way to slam Obama. It's ridiculous and appalling. Nobody wants to look at the real matters behind it all. Either do it illegally, or don't do it at all. It's like there's no middle ground for rational minds.
Do you really think she has a case?
A case? For what, a lawsuit? Don't know. She would have had a good case for a Habeus petition, but that's moot now. If she decided to try making a Section 1983 claim she could have a case. Not only the lack of probable cause, but being denied access to a lawyer.
Why don't you have her move in with you and your family then?
She wasn't under arrest
and you don't know if she even requested a lawyer, fool.
Cuomo (D) NY and Quinn(D) Illinois have the same quarantines in effect, fool!
It is not a violation of our rights.
It is in our constitution.
Article ! Sec. 8 Clause 3
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several Statse, and with the Indian tribes.
Commerce -social relations and exchange as well as the purchase and sale of goods and services.
She wasn't under arrest
So she was always free to leave?
and you don't know if she even requested a lawyer, fool.
Actually, yes I do. It was widely reported that she had been denied access to her lawyer.
Cuomo (D) NY and Quinn(D) Illinois have the same quarantines in effect, fool!
So let's do the math. Two Democrats and one left leaning Republican. And you still want to say that this is a conservative thing to do?
It is not a violation of our rights.
It is in our constitution.
Article ! Sec. 8 Clause 3
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.
Commerce -social relations and exchange as well as the purchase and sale of goods and services.
Are you seriously trying to argue that the commerce clause eliminates our fourth amendment protected rights? Wow, you lunatics are really, really, sick in the mind. The commerce clause has been used (and abused) to justify a wide range of government power. But I've never, ever, heard of someone saying that it empowers state governments to erase the fourth amendment. That kind of absurdly far reaching absolute power would have scared Joseph Stalin.
It has been used ever since we became a nation to isolate people who might have an infectious disease and all courts have used the commerce clause as the base of being able to do so since 1776.
The 4th amendment pertains to any criminal law not contagious illnesses.
It has been used ever since we became a nation to isolate people who might have an infectious disease and all courts have used the commerce clause as the base of being able to do so since 1776.
But it does not erase 4th amendment rights.
The 4th amendment pertains to any criminal law not contagious illnesses.
No! It pertains to everything! Every single kind of search and/or seizure. It does not matter what the government's goal may be. The right of the people to be secure in their person from unreasonable seizure shall not be infringed. Period! That's why the government is required to have probable cause for an involuntary hold in a psychiatric facility. That's a health issue too.
As I've pointed out to you so many times already, just because quarantines are a generally legal does not mean that all actions of quarantine are legal. There has never been any probable cause to indicate that Kaci Hickox was infected with Ebola. Your "maybe" argument is no different than arresting someone who owns a gun because "maybe" they'll kill someone with it. It's bullshit there, and it's bullshit here.
Spoken like a true left wing imbecile. There is already no threat of contagion. More importantly, there is no legal grounds to imprison her. And no grounds for a liberty loving people to tolerate such an imprisonment.
