Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You want people to assume that means 9-11? Bullshit, Put the fuckin charge on the goddamn wanted poster, show some fuckin evidence he was responsible and this country went to war for the right reason and 9-11 wasn't a ruse to further advance the NWO. Otherwise I am not buying the official Gov story.You all can keep on smoking the crap they put in your pipe, not me.USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
From the OP's link.
You want people to assume that means 9-11? Bullshit, Put the fuckin charge on the goddamn wanted poster, show some fuckin evidence he was responsible and this country went to war for the right reason and 9-11 wasn't a ruse to further advance the NWO. Otherwise I am not buying the official Gov story.You all can keep on smoking the crap they put in your pipe, not me.USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
From the OP's link.
wrong again, dipshit, i use the rep system as a peer review system like it was meant to beand you didnt get it right again
you are just too fucking stupid to understand
There isn't much to understand. Anyone can see you use the neg rep out of childish frustration for your inability to debate 9E. Since you can't beat people down with your brain you try to compensate with other means.
and i neg rep dipshits like you because you are dipshits
You want people to assume that means 9-11? Bullshit, Put the fuckin charge on the goddamn wanted poster, show some fuckin evidence he was responsible and this country went to war for the right reason and 9-11 wasn't a ruse to further advance the NWO. Otherwise I am not buying the official Gov story.You all can keep on smoking the crap they put in your pipe, not me.USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
From the OP's link.
Get a grip. It's only a poster.
Also because of OBL's involvement in 911, the Senate increased the reward money from $25 million to $50 million.
"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."
David N. Kelley, the former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to Sept. 11 on the official wanted poster. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant.
Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings? - washingtonpost.com
How could Silverstein flip buildings he did not own?
Was the lease non-transferable?
What was confusing about:
How could Silverstein flip buildings he did not own?
Dodging only proves your ignorance. What does wapedia say about that?
Yeah, right.
"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."
David N. Kelley, the former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to Sept. 11 on the official wanted poster. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant.
Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings? - washingtonpost.com
Forget the poster. Explain why BL has never been charged with 9E.
"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."
David N. Kelley, the former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to Sept. 11 on the official wanted poster. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant.
Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings? - washingtonpost.com
Forget the poster. Explain why BL has never been charged with 9E.
Because he is not part of the criminal justice justem.
He is an unlawful combatant.
Was the lease non-transferable?
What was confusing about:
How could Silverstein flip buildings he did not own?
Dodging only proves your ignorance. What does wapedia say about that?
He can sell the lease if it is transferable.
Speaking of dodges, you cannot answer a simple question. Why would Silverstein buy a building and insure it for the purchase price and maintenance capital expenditures then have it blown up? That makes zero sense.
The premise of this ridiculous twoofer argument is that for him to have profited, he would have had to have known what the court settlement would have been years later, which means he would have had to have known not only what the judge would decide, but also what market values and construction costs would have been well into the future. Even for twoofers, that is an enormous leap of logic.
"Just asking questions."
Forget the poster. Explain why BL has never been charged with 9E.
Because he is not part of the criminal justice justem.
He is an unlawful combatant.
You don't know what you are talking about. He was indicted in Federal courts about 12 years ago. Now that we have the "unlawful combatant" shit out of the way, how about attempting an informed answer?
Why isn't Bin Laden wanted for 9-11?
Bin Laden has always been wanted by the Democrats.
By the Republicans, not so much. In fact, they gave him a 9 year "head start", so it's going to be very difficult to find him. Of course, they did find Saddam, only he didn't do anything to us.
Republicans, bass ackwards.
Of course, they did find Saddam, only he didn't do anything to us.
Why isn't Bin Laden wanted for 9-11?
Bin Laden has always been wanted by the Democrats.
By the Republicans, not so much. In fact, they gave him a 9 year "head start", so it's going to be very difficult to find him. Of course, they did find Saddam, only he didn't do anything to us.
Republicans, bass ackwards.
hey dipshit, if you really think i'm abusing it, report mewrong again, dipshit, i use the rep system as a peer review system like it was meant to beThere isn't much to understand. Anyone can see you use the neg rep out of childish frustration for your inability to debate 9E. Since you can't beat people down with your brain you try to compensate with other means.
and i neg rep dipshits like you because you are dipshits
What a fucking coward. You can't even be honest about how you abuse the neg rep button to try and compensate for your total inability to debate.
correctedWas the lease non-transferable?
What was confusing about:
How could Silverstein flip buildings he did not own?
Dodging only proves your ignorance. What does wapedia say about that?
He can sell the lease if it is transferable.
Speaking of dodges, you cannot answer a simple question. Why would Silverstein buy a (LEASE OF A) building and insure it for the purchase price and maintenance capital expenditures then have it blown up? That makes zero sense.
The premise of this ridiculous twoofer argument is that for him to have profited, he would have had to have known what the court settlement would have been years later, which means he would have had to have known not only what the judge would decide, but also what market values and construction costs would have been well into the future. Even for twoofers, that is an enormous leap of logic.
"Just asking questions."
i dont think he's pretendingOf course, they did find Saddam, only he didn't do anything to us.
are you a complete moron or just pretending to be?
he fired missiles at our aircraft on an almost daily basis. we foiled a plot he was behind to kill our ex-president.
"We know that he has stored nuclear supplies, secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
John Kerry October 9th, 2002
