healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,048
- 10,528
- 900
Teddy Roosevelt did the same thing
A show of force is an effective deterrent. I only wish Bush resorted to a show of force rather than US invasions
You mean a show of force like this??
"Between 1999 and 2001, the U.S. and British-led air forces in Iraq dropped 1.3 million pounds of bombs in response to purported violations of the no-fly zones and anti-aircraft fire from Saddam Hussein.
A sweeping attack, conducted in January of 1999, rained down 25 missiles on Iraqi soil, killing civilians. Clinton said the attack was in response to four planes violating the no-fly zones.
Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair authorized air strikes on more than 100 days in 1999, sometimes several times per day. The bombings were ostensibly in response to Husseins refusal to allow UN weapons inspectors into the country, though critics alleged the move was aimed at deflecting attention from impeachment.
The Raw Story | Clinton bombing of Iraq far exceeded Bush's in run-up to war; Bush 'spikes of activity' questioned
AND..
"When Clinton was here recently he told me he was absolutely convinced, given his years in the White House and the access to privileged information which he had, that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction until the end of the Saddam regime," he said in an interview with Portuguese cable news channel SIC Noticias.
Clinton believes Iraq had weapons of mass destruction: Portugal PM
But that was a show of force that Saddam ignored obviously.
So even with the above show of force failed.. you would walk away from 100,000 children starving to death because Saddam refused to obey UN sanctions and the US agreed to provide enforcement?
Last edited: