Why It's Hard to Have an Intelligent Political Debate With Progressives

[longknife]

Because you can show them information like this – and they will either ignore or try to deflect from it. The blogger goes on to outline one fact after another that his counterpart either ignores or simply brushes aside.



At what point to de learn that even trying to debate with progressives is a losing proposition?



Read more @ Obama’s speech highlights why it’s hard to have an intelligent political debate with Progressives

 

[Timmy]

How about reality .

How many Muslims live in the US be those that have terrorized the U.S. ?

You are just looking for an excuse to vent your bigotry .

 

[Contumacious]

s

Why It's Hard to Have an Intelligent Political Debate With Progressives [/quote]

OK LETS HAVE AN INTELLIGENT POLITICAL DEBATE, ADDRESS THESE ISSUES FIRST:

1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

 

[the_human_being]

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf

 

[Two Thumbs]

You can't have a conversation with people that think tyranny is freedom.

When they can't grasp how wrong that is, how to you explain to them that islam would kill them first given the chance?

All the attacks in the western world are in cities. what lives in cities? leftists. So who are the muslims killing and who cares that they are getting killed?




how bizarre is it that we care that leftist are being killed while they support their killers?

 

[hazlnut]

s

Why It's Hard to Have an Intelligent Political Debate With Progressives

OK LETS HAVE AN INTELLIGENT POLITICAL DEBATE, ADDRESS THESE ISSUES FIRST:

1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.
[/QUOTE]



You are not intelligent, therefore the conversation you are TRYING to have is not.

In other words, your struggle to have an "intelligent" conversation with a progressive is your lack of education and critical thinking skills.

It's like you're speaking a different language.

 

[Two Thumbs]

s

Why It's Hard to Have an Intelligent Political Debate With Progressives

OK LETS HAVE AN INTELLIGENT POLITICAL DEBATE, ADDRESS THESE ISSUES FIRST:

1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.
[/QUOTE]
1) that was the UN
2) It's got to be more than that. I think that's just the yearly pay out
3) what utter bullshit
4) more non-sense


making shit up is not debate

 

[Two Thumbs]

s

Why It's Hard to Have an Intelligent Political Debate With Progressives

OK LETS HAVE AN INTELLIGENT POLITICAL DEBATE, ADDRESS THESE ISSUES FIRST:

1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

You are not intelligent, therefore the conversation you are TRYING to have is not.

In other words, your struggle to have an "intelligent" conversation with a progressive is your lack of education and critical thinking skills.

It's like you're speaking a different language.[/QUOTE]
The irony

 

[the_human_being]

 

[Pete7469]

Libturds have paralyzed frontal lobes. There is no cognitive function going on there.

You can have a more intellectual conversation with a goldfish.

 

[Contumacious]

s

Why It's Hard to Have an Intelligent Political Debate With Progressives

OK LETS HAVE AN INTELLIGENT POLITICAL DEBATE, ADDRESS THESE ISSUES FIRST:

1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

1) that was the UN
2) It's got to be more than that. I think that's just the yearly pay out
3) what utter bullshit
4) more non-sense


making shit up is not debate[/QUOTE]





IF WHAT I STATED IS "SHIT" THEN IT SHOULD BE EASY FOR YOU TO REBUT/REFUTE OR SHUT THE FUCK UP.

1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.


.

 

[Contumacious]

View attachment 56520

SHOW ME ***EVIDENCE* THAT SHE WAS ONE OF THE PERPETRATORs.

I AM LOOKING FOR BUILDING SECURITY VIDEOS, POLICE CRUISE DASHCAM VIDEOS. EYEWITNESSES.



WE'LL TAKE FROM THERE.


.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Left wingers just chant the wrong answer until you agree with it just to get them out of your face. Seriously!

 

[Syriusly]

Because you can show them information like this – and they will either ignore or try to deflect from it.

See the difference between a Conservative like you- and a "Progressive" like me- is that I challenge unsubstantiated claims like this- while you choose to believe them at face value.

You believe whatever your Conservative Bloggers tell you.

Even though that image has no links- no source- you blindly believe it.


Progressives like myself actually look for Facts that can be corroborated.

 

[Syriusly]

Libturds have paralyzed frontal lobes. There is no cognitive function going on there.

You can have a more intellectual conversation with a goldfish.

LOL- and sadly you are what passes for an 'intellectual' among the far right.

 

[CowboyTed]

Reality better kick in...

American Muslims (citizen or refugees) kill far less people that regular Americans.

If you want to compare Turkey's crime rate against US...

For a violent people they don't commit much crime in comparison...

These are countries with far more poverty but have less crime...
So keep fishing...

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You can't have a conversation with people that think tyranny is freedom.

When they can't grasp how wrong that is, how to you explain to them that islam would kill them first given the chance?

All the attacks in the western world are in cities. what lives in cities? leftists. So who are the muslims killing and who cares that they are getting killed?




how bizarre is it that we care that leftist are being killed while they support their killers?

There is that....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Reality better kick in...

American Muslims (citizen or refugees) kill far less people that regular Americans.

If you want to compare Turkey's crime rate against US...

For a violent people they don't commit much crime in comparison...

View attachment 56524

These are countries with far more poverty but have less crime...
So keep fishing...

So what exactly does that have to do with muslims wanting to kill westerners?
Oh thats right....absolutely nothing.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Because you can show them information like this – and they will either ignore or try to deflect from it. The blogger goes on to outline one fact after another that his counterpart either ignores or simply brushes aside.



At what point to de learn that even trying to debate with progressives is a losing proposition?



Read more @ Obama’s speech highlights why it’s hard to have an intelligent political debate with Progressives

How large is Isis's army? 180 million? 300 million?

Or is it only 25-30,000. Hmm, something no add uppy Bok Choi.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Because you can show them information like this – and they will either ignore or try to deflect from it. The blogger goes on to outline one fact after another that his counterpart either ignores or simply brushes aside.



At what point to de learn that even trying to debate with progressives is a losing proposition?



Read more @ Obama’s speech highlights why it’s hard to have an intelligent political debate with Progressives

I'll debate you on anything we disagree on.