Why RussiaGate is 100% 'fake news'"

[jc456]

The NSA acknowledges that there IS NO EVIDENCE.
.

Just the opposite. Who do you think broughrt the claim to the FBI?

Evidence of Russian interference is what started the FBI investigation.

how you figure? did you not read what clapper said on meet the press on here fifteen times? He was the head of the NSA. he said he had squat juice bubba. try again. you keep failing.

 

[jc456]

No, it was the story that the DNC server was hacked and Podesta. now unless you have something regarding those two stories, then all you have is propaganda that is all legit. wish to try again?

Why do you have a jones for the DNC server. While Russia planted hundreds of 'fake news' stories.

you didn't seriously just ask that question. you're a lost soul. more losing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"your claiming they're anonymous"

You moron....WaPo stated that.

You've shown you're a 'useful idiot' repeating the false claims of others. Who cares what the WaPo said, since Who cares what the WaPo said, since you probably misquoted them. I showed my article was sourced with the names of those who reserarched it.

Wanna try another 'fake news' attack?, This is certainly the thread for it.

1. "you're a 'useful idiot' repeating the false claims of others"
You have yet to find any 'false' claims.

2. " Who cares what the WaPo said, "
You.
You're the one who quoted the article.
Sooo....how long have you been diagnosed as psychotic???

3. "...since you probably misquoted them."
I took them exactly.....exactly....from the article you linked to.

4. "I showed my article was sourced with the names of those who reserarched (sic) it."
Here it is again:
Did you see this 'expert' quoted in your link????

"...PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity,...."

See why everyone is laughing at you, you dunce?

And the WaPo actually writes this: "...The Post does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings ...."

Gads, you're a fool!



5. OK.....let's see what we've proven together:
a. You haven't been right since disco died.

b. You're sort of an idiot-savant....without the savant.

c. ...it's been downhill for you since you started hangin' out with Jack.........Daniels.

 

[OldLady]

Your'e really taking your role as a Putin supporter seriously. How much is Vlad paying you?

Translation:

"I wish I could find even a single error in these posts....they utterly destroy my most deeply held worldviews!"

No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports.
The full court press by the Left and it's allies is to support their failed candidate and failed policies.
I think it's payback for Benghazi investigations that repeated ad nauseum. This, unfortunately, will no doubt play out the same way, and its adherents will not believe the results, no matter what is found. Bank on it.

"No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports."

Your wait is over, Windy....


"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror

You're just vomiting old news. Clapper has left the government. RussiaGate is about more than Russia interfering with the election. It is an investigation of how much interference in what forms and with whose assistance. You should be as interested in knowing that as anyone else. Defending Trump and his administration has thrown you on the side of the Russians, it seems like to me. I would prefer foreign countries stay out of it when we elect our leaders. Wouldn't you? Then quit barking at the moon and wait for the information.

I would also prefer our leaders to stay out of elections being held in other nations. For example, when Obama spent tax money to meddle with the Isreali elections.

I wouldn't call spending our tax money a covert act. Hiring hackers and trolls and writers of fiction all directed at getting rid of Trump's opponent is a different kettle of fish.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The NSA acknowledges that there IS NO EVIDENCE.
.

Just the opposite. Who do you think broughrt the claim to the FBI?

Evidence of Russian interference is what started the FBI investigation.

Who brought the claim to the FBI was the Clinton campaign, based on a claim by CrowdStrike, a Clinton paid group that made, and then retracted claims of evidence of Russian hacking of known Russian Agent John Podesta (Podesta Group, Sberbank (Russian Central Bank), Russian Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych).

We KNOW where the fake claims came from. What we DON'T have is even a HINT of evidence to support any of the claims.

{
U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has revised and retracted statements it used to buttress claims of Russian hacking during last year’s American presidential election campaign. The shift followed a VOA report that the company misrepresented data published by an influential British think tank.

In December, CrowdStrike said it found evidence that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, contributing to heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine’s war with pro-Russian separatists.

VOA reported Tuesday that the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which publishes an annual reference estimating the strength of world armed forces, disavowed the CrowdStrike report and said it had never been contacted by the company.

CrowdStrike was first to link hacks of Democratic Party computers to Russian actors last year, but some cybersecurity experts have questioned its evidence. The company has come under fire from some Republicans who say charges of Kremlin meddling in the election are overblown.

After CrowdStrike released its Ukraine report, company co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch claimed it provided added evidence of Russian election interference. In both hacks, he said, the company found malware used by “Fancy Bear,” a group with ties to Russian intelligence agencies.

CrowdStrike’s claims of heavy Ukrainian artillery losses were widely circulated in U.S. media.

On Thursday, CrowdStrike walked back key parts of its Ukraine report.

The company removed language that said Ukraine’s artillery lost 80 percent of the Soviet-era D-30 howitzers, which used aiming software that purportedly was hacked. Instead, the revised report cites figures of 15 to 20 percent losses in combat operations, attributing the figures to IISS.

Finally, CrowdStrike deleted a statement saying “deployment of this malware-infected application may have contributed to the high-loss nature of this platform” — meaning the howitzers — and excised a link sourcing its IISS data to a blogger in Russia-occupied Crimea.

}

"Something Stinks Here" - CrowdStrike Revises, Retracts Parts Of Explosive Russian Hacking Report | Zero Hedge

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The whole Russian narrative is beyond stupid. Why would the Russians interfere in Trump's behalf when clearly the Clintons were pretty cozy with them. Also, are they really arguing that the Russians interfered in the voting process on the behalf of Trump therefore giving her 3,000,000 more votes?

Talk about taking stupid to new heights.

 

[Camp]

The NSA acknowledges that there IS NO EVIDENCE.
.

Just the opposite. Who do you think broughrt the claim to the FBI?

Evidence of Russian interference is what started the FBI investigation.

how you figure? did you not read what clapper said on meet the press on here fifteen times? He was the head of the NSA. he said he had squat juice bubba. try again. you keep failing.

You have fallen for PoliticalChics sucker bait. Clapper did not deny interference, meddling, and attempts to confuse or influence, He was commenting specifically about colluding. Colluding is a legal term that represents conspiring. It means two specific people of parties conspire to create a specific incident or event. That is not the same as interfering, meddling or influencing.

 

[Rustic]

The "Russian connection" is nothing but a big ol' nothing Burger...

 

[postman]

how you figure? did you not read what clapper said on meet the press on here fifteen times? He was the head of the NSA. he said he had squat juice bubba. try again. you keep failing.

Good point. But being the head doesn;'t mean you know everything going on underneath you. Take for example Ronald Reagan and Iran/Contra. Saint Ronnie said he had no idea we were trading arms for hostages. So when Clapper said he didn't know of things that were still in the investigation stage, it doesn't mean they didn't happen.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"your claiming they're anonymous"

You moron....WaPo stated that.

You've shown you're a 'useful idiot' repeating the false claims of others. Who cares what the WaPo said, since Who cares what the WaPo said, since you probably misquoted them. I showed my article was sourced with the names of those who reserarched it.

Wanna try another 'fake news' attack?, This is certainly the thread for it.

1. "you're a 'useful idiot' repeating the false claims of others"
You have yet to find any 'false' claims.

2. " Who cares what the WaPo said, "
You.
You're the one who quoted the article.
Sooo....how long have you been diagnosed as psychotic???

3. "...since you probably misquoted them."
I took them exactly.....exactly....from the article you linked to.

4. "I showed my article was sourced with the names of those who reserarched (sic) it."
Well....let's go from your article:
Did you see this 'expert' quoted in your link????

"...PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity,...."

See why everyone is laughing at you, you dunce?

And the WaPo actually writes this: "...The Post does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings ...."


Gads, you're a fool!


5. Shall we review what we have established together?

a. You're sort of an idiot-savant....without the savant.

b. You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet

c. You are to stupidity what the Chinese are to gunpowder.



You may pin the tail on yourself.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ready to retract your 'experts' post, not that I've destroyed it????


Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
.

You have NOT destroyed it. If anything your claiming they're anonymous only bolsters their claims. They all put their names on their reports. WHy claim they were anonymous?

"WHy claim they were anonymous?"


Because your link says so...""...PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity,...."

 

[Camp]

The whole Russian narrative is beyond stupid. Why would the Russians interfere in Trump's behalf when clearly the Clintons were pretty cozy with them. Also, are they really arguing that the Russians interfered in the voting process on the behalf of Trump therefore giving her 3,000,000 more votes?

Talk about taking stupid to new heights.

The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia. It was Bill who promoted NATO expansion, Hillary who exposed Putin election corruption and Russia blames Clinton influence as Sec. of State for influencing a pro-EU and anti-Russia stance in Ukraine.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The NSA acknowledges that there IS NO EVIDENCE.
.

Just the opposite. Who do you think broughrt the claim to the FBI?

Evidence of Russian interference is what started the FBI investigation.

how you figure? did you not read what clapper said on meet the press on here fifteen times? He was the head of the NSA. he said he had squat juice bubba. try again. you keep failing.

You have fallen for PoliticalChics sucker bait. Clapper did not deny interference, meddling, and attempts to confuse or influence, He was commenting specifically about colluding. Colluding is a legal term that represents conspiring. It means two specific people of parties conspire to create a specific incident or event. That is not the same as interfering, meddling or influencing.

You fascists came out with a big and outrageous lie, which is the way you operate.

YOU claimed that "Russia hacked the election." Obviously you were lying, and the lie was so absurd that even WaPo had to tone down the utter stupidity. Then you fascists started lying that "The Russians hacked the DNC server." But the RNC let the FBI examine their server, no hacking. Major states let the FBI examine their servers, but NOT the DNC, they refused to let law enforcement anywhere near - since the DNC is more organized crime than a legitimate political party.

So any LEGITIMATE claim of hacking ended the SECOND the crooked fucks in the fascist democrats refused to allow a valid investigation. You can't get evidence if you're not allowed to examine the supposed crime scene.

And NOW we find out that John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chief of staff, is in fact a Russian agent. Podesta who was laughingly pointed to as the target of Russian hacking.

So NOW that all of your outrageous fucking lies have been exposed, NOW you start with the "well, they had people posting things we fascists didn't like on Facebook, no fair.."

This witch hunt that you fascists have run is the most disgusting I have EVER witnessed in my life.

I am ashamed that such a thing could happen in America. I am ashamed that you fascist scum democrats can exist in America.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Try to remember
a. Every piece of information from a Democrat source is a lie.

12. "There is NO evidence

a. There is no proof of any sort that the Trump folks sought or accepted Russian aid in winning the election.... nor has any intelligence official claimed that there is.

b. Felonies associated with the recent campaign and election were committed, with evidence of same....by the Obama administration and their supporters.

Your'e really taking your role as a Putin supporter seriously. How much is Vlad paying you?

Translation:

"I wish I could find even a single error in these posts....they utterly destroy my most deeply held worldviews!"

No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports.
The full court press by the Left and it's allies is to support their failed candidate and failed policies.
I think it's payback for Benghazi investigations that repeated ad nauseum. This, unfortunately, will no doubt play out the same way, and its adherents will not believe the results, no matter what is found. Bank on it.

"No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports."

Your wait is over, Windy....


"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror

You're just vomiting old news. Clapper has left the government. RussiaGate is about more than Russia interfering with the election. It is an investigation of how much interference in what forms and with whose assistance. You should be as interested in knowing that as anyone else. Defending Trump and his administration has thrown you on the side of the Russians, it seems like to me. I would prefer foreign countries stay out of it when we elect our leaders. Wouldn't you? Then quit barking at the moon and wait for the information.

Soooo.....which current heads of intelligence agencies claim there is any evidence of Russian involvement, Windy?


None?


Which brings up this query.....we proved earlier that you are one of our best sources of Greenhouse Gases....
...so, why are you back with more of the same?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The NSA acknowledges that there IS NO EVIDENCE.
.

Just the opposite. Who do you think broughrt the claim to the FBI?

Evidence of Russian interference is what started the FBI investigation.

Better provide quotes to that effect or everyone will know you're an inveterate liar, RecessiveGene.



Waiting.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Running a slanderous smear on page 1, then a retraction in section D, page 33, below the death notices, is a favorite trick of fake news.

Actually that's called a mistake. Fake news runs with the lie, and even doubles down on it. Even fox news has retracted stories, and when they did, I no longer considered them to be fake news.

You seem to have a ton of 'fake news' to retract....

Better start.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia. It was Bill who promoted NATO expansion, Hillary who exposed Putin election corruption and Russia blames Clinton influence as Sec. of State for influencing a pro-EU and anti-Russia stance in Ukraine.

Ah, lying again?

You do that a lot. Well, you ARE a fascist Nazicrat after all.

Mob Boss Hillary Clinton has made a career of selling favors to the extremely rich and powerful. From her early days of defrauding Little Rock Businesses with threats of crippling witch hunt investigations by the Attorney General, her husband and lackey Bill, to the brokering of uranium sales to Vladamir Putin, Hillary has been in the pocket of those who could pay.


The connections to big oil like Exxon Mobil, Duke Energy, Citi Bank, are well known. Exxon and Duke move Russian oil to Europe, the Clinton Mob has their hands in it. Citi is the major financier for the Russian oil trade working with Moscow based Alfa Bank. The Clinton crime family has received huge sums from Citi. Interestingly enough, many of the ties to the Clinton Mob also trace back to the Bush family, partially explaining the demand of Dubya that Citi be bailed out in 2008.


Selling Uranium to Putin:


{In 2015, The New York Times reported on the ties between the Clinton Foundation and its board member, Canadian Financier Frank Giustra, as a Russian company pushed for control of United States based uranium resources. In 2008, The New York Times reported that Giustra donated millions of dollars to gain access to the Clintons and used his relationship as leverage in a multi-million-dollar uranium deal in the former Soviet Union Republic of Kazakhstan, which Bill Clinton visited with him.}


This dirty little deal reveals the close ties of the Clinton Mob and Russia and illustrates the crime family working AS AN AGENT of the Russian government.


Direct Payments from Russia:


{In June 2010, Bill Clinton visited Moscow to give a keynote speech for $500,000 to Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank owned by Mikhail Prokhorov, who owns the Brooklyn Nets, Barclays Center Arena, and several other entertainment venues in Brooklyn. In 2015, The Wall Street Journal reported that Clinton received a personal thank you note for the speech from Vladimir Putin and a press release from Renaissance Capital noted that the conference was attended by several Russian officials and corporate leaders.}


A cool half million from Putin to the Clinton mob, no need for a go between. This was at a time when Mafia Don Hillary was Secretary of State and close to the time Barack Obama was promising "flexibility" in dealing with Putin.


Ties to the Russian Mob:


International crime is a major factor in our world. That an American crime family like the Clintons would align themselves with Russian mobsters is not surprising, and in fact fully expected.


Billionaire Mikhail Fridman, the founder and owner of the Russia-based Alfa Bank is one of the premiere heads of organized crime in Russia. In 2003, Bill Clinton presented the Golden Plate Award of the International Academy of Achievement in Washington D.C. to this close associate of theirs.


In 2016, Bloomberg reported that Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff Thomas McLarty III was advising Fridman’s company LetterOne about investing $3 billion in the United States’ healthcare system.


{Emails obtained from the conservative group Citizens United revealed that the Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton’s State Department to meet with Russian billionaire Viktor Veselberg, who has donated at least $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation.}


KGB Links:


The Russian Mob grew out of the former KGB, so it is of little surprise that many Clinton confidants are former KGB agents including Putin himself.


{Billionaire Gennady Timchenko, who is rumored to be a former KGB agent, acquired several holdings of Clinton donor Tom Steyer’s hedge fund in 2010.}


{Russian billionaire Leonard Blavatnik’s wife has donated $33,400 to the Democratic Party and gave the maximum donation for an individual, $2,700, to Hillary Clinton during her presidential campaign. Daria Zhukova, the wife of Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich, a Putin ally, donated the same amount.}


The Podesta Link:


Last week I pointed out, as did many others on this board, that Mob Boss Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, John Podesta was neck deep in dealing with Russia. John runs the Podesta Group with his brother Tony. The Podesta group;


{in 2016 lobbied on behalf of Sberbank, which is owned by the Russian Central Bank. The firm also lobbied for a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine, the same one that caused Trump adviser Paul Manafort to resign in embarrassment after it was revealed that he worked for former pro-Russian Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. Politico reported that the revelations about Manafort were provided to the Clinton campaign from the Ukrainian government through a DNC consultant who met with Ukrainian officials at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington D.C.}



References:


https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Hillary's Russia Connection

Speaking Fees Meet Politics for Clintons

The Clintons’ Neoliberal Dystopian Ties to Russia’s Billionaires

 

[postman]

b. You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet

c. You are to stupidity what the Chinese are to gunpowder.

You may pin the tail on yourself.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.


Influence Effort Was Boldest Yet in the US


Russia’s effort to influence the 2016 US presidential election represented a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations aimed at US elections.

Russian Cyber Intrusions Into State and Local Electoral Boards. Russian intelligence accessed elements of multiple state or local electoral boards. Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data. We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The whole Russian narrative is beyond stupid. Why would the Russians interfere in Trump's behalf when clearly the Clintons were pretty cozy with them. Also, are they really arguing that the Russians interfered in the voting process on the behalf of Trump therefore giving her 3,000,000 more votes?

Talk about taking stupid to new heights.

The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia. It was Bill who promoted NATO expansion, Hillary who exposed Putin election corruption and Russia blames Clinton influence as Sec. of State for influencing a pro-EU and anti-Russia stance in Ukraine.

"The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia."

"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


You really make this far too easy....
...is it because you such a transparent liar, or because you're abysmally stupid???

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet

c. You are to stupidity what the Chinese are to gunpowder.

You may pin the tail on yourself.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.


Influence Effort Was Boldest Yet in the US


Russia’s effort to influence the 2016 US presidential election represented a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations aimed at US elections.

Russian Cyber Intrusions Into State and Local Electoral Boards. Russian intelligence accessed elements of multiple state or local electoral boards. Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data. We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror