Why RussiaGate is 100% 'fake news'"

The "Russian connection" is nothing but a big ol' nothing Burger...

It's more than that.

It is a concerted effort by the Soros owned and operated democratic party with the corrupt media to pervert and corrupt the operation of the Federal Government in an attempt to take down the legal and legitimate government of this nation.

It is sedition, bordering on outright treason.
 
The whole Russian narrative is beyond stupid. Why would the Russians interfere in Trump's behalf when clearly the Clintons were pretty cozy with them. Also, are they really arguing that the Russians interfered in the voting process on the behalf of Trump therefore giving her 3,000,000 more votes?

Talk about taking stupid to new heights.
The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia. It was Bill who promoted NATO expansion, Hillary who exposed Putin election corruption and Russia blames Clinton influence as Sec. of State for influencing a pro-EU and anti-Russia stance in Ukraine.


"The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia."

"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


You really make this far too easy....
...is it because you such a transparent liar, or because you're abysmally stupid???

He IS a liar, but such is the way of fascist democrats.
 
The NSA acknowledges that there IS NO EVIDENCE.
.

Just the opposite. Who do you think broughrt the claim to the FBI?

Evidence of Russian interference is what started the FBI investigation.
how you figure? did you not read what clapper said on meet the press on here fifteen times? He was the head of the NSA. he said he had squat juice bubba. try again. you keep failing.
You have fallen for PoliticalChics sucker bait. Clapper did not deny interference, meddling, and attempts to confuse or influence, He was commenting specifically about colluding. Colluding is a legal term that represents conspiring. It means two specific people of parties conspire to create a specific incident or event. That is not the same as interfering, meddling or influencing.

You fascists came out with a big and outrageous lie, which is the way you operate.

YOU claimed that "Russia hacked the election." Obviously you were lying, and the lie was so absurd that even WaPo had to tone down the utter stupidity. Then you fascists started lying that "The Russians hacked the DNC server." But the RNC let the FBI examine their server, no hacking. Major states let the FBI examine their servers, but NOT the DNC, they refused to let law enforcement anywhere near - since the DNC is more organized crime than a legitimate political party.

So an LEGITIMATE claim of hacking ended the SECOND the crooked fucks in the fascist democrats refused to allow a valid investigation. You can't get evidence if you're not allowed to examine the supposed crime scene.

And NOW we find out that John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chief of staff, is in fact a Russian agent. Podesta who was laughingly pointed to as the target of Russian hacking.

So NOW that all of your outrageous fucking lies have been exposed, NOW you start with the "well, they had people posting things we fascists didn't like on Facebook, no fair.."

This witch hunt that you fascists have run in the most disgusting I have EVER witnessed in my life.

I am ashamed that such a thing could happen in America. I am ashamed that you fascist scum democrats can exist in America.
This is why you are called unhinged. I didn't make any claims. You are attacking and slandering me because you do not have the wit or intelligence to articulate your views.You need insults and slander to bolster you bullshyt. There has to be a bad guy in your hate filled rant. Also, I am not a fascist and you would not know a fascist if you saw one. You don't have a clue about what a fascist is.
All you are doing is giving a distorted and foolish rant of talking points on one side of a discussion being debated on a national level, but pretending like you have some kind of super duper level of knowledge beyond what everyone else has.
 
Translation:

"I wish I could find even a single error in these posts....they utterly destroy my most deeply held worldviews!"
No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports.
The full court press by the Left and it's allies is to support their failed candidate and failed policies.
I think it's payback for Benghazi investigations that repeated ad nauseum. This, unfortunately, will no doubt play out the same way, and its adherents will not believe the results, no matter what is found. Bank on it.

"No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports."

Your wait is over, Windy....


"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


You're just vomiting old news. Clapper has left the government. RussiaGate is about more than Russia interfering with the election. It is an investigation of how much interference in what forms and with whose assistance. You should be as interested in knowing that as anyone else. Defending Trump and his administration has thrown you on the side of the Russians, it seems like to me. I would prefer foreign countries stay out of it when we elect our leaders. Wouldn't you? Then quit barking at the moon and wait for the information.


I would also prefer our leaders to stay out of elections being held in other nations. For example, when Obama spent tax money to meddle with the Isreali elections.

I wouldn't call spending our tax money a covert act. Hiring hackers and trolls and writers of fiction all directed at getting rid of Trump's opponent is a different kettle of fish.




Could you give some examples of stories about the congenital liar and career criminal that were unknown before the election.


'Cause if there are none....it would identify you as a windbag....wouldn't it?
 
I pointed out the US government hack job (pun intended) of this claim when this shit broke. CrowdStrike is a Ukrainian political entity that snookered the entire DNC and our moron intelligence agencies.

Hell I "retired" from "hacking" nearly two decades ago and I'm feeling embarrassed by our intelligence community - they're absolutely useless... Pathetic.
 
The NSA acknowledges that there IS NO EVIDENCE.
.

Just the opposite. Who do you think broughrt the claim to the FBI?

Evidence of Russian interference is what started the FBI investigation.
how you figure? did you not read what clapper said on meet the press on here fifteen times? He was the head of the NSA. he said he had squat juice bubba. try again. you keep failing.
You have fallen for PoliticalChics sucker bait. Clapper did not deny interference, meddling, and attempts to confuse or influence, He was commenting specifically about colluding. Colluding is a legal term that represents conspiring. It means two specific people of parties conspire to create a specific incident or event. That is not the same as interfering, meddling or influencing.

You fascists came out with a big and outrageous lie, which is the way you operate.

YOU claimed that "Russia hacked the election." Obviously you were lying, and the lie was so absurd that even WaPo had to tone down the utter stupidity. Then you fascists started lying that "The Russians hacked the DNC server." But the RNC let the FBI examine their server, no hacking. Major states let the FBI examine their servers, but NOT the DNC, they refused to let law enforcement anywhere near - since the DNC is more organized crime than a legitimate political party.

So an LEGITIMATE claim of hacking ended the SECOND the crooked fucks in the fascist democrats refused to allow a valid investigation. You can't get evidence if you're not allowed to examine the supposed crime scene.

And NOW we find out that John Podesta, the Clinton campaign chief of staff, is in fact a Russian agent. Podesta who was laughingly pointed to as the target of Russian hacking.

So NOW that all of your outrageous fucking lies have been exposed, NOW you start with the "well, they had people posting things we fascists didn't like on Facebook, no fair.."

This witch hunt that you fascists have run in the most disgusting I have EVER witnessed in my life.

I am ashamed that such a thing could happen in America. I am ashamed that you fascist scum democrats can exist in America.
This is why you are called unhinged. I didn't make any claims. You are attacking and slandering me because you do not have the wti or intelligence to articulate you view. There has to be a bad guy in your hate filled rant. Also, I am not a fascist and you would not know a fascist if you saw one. You don't have a clue about what a fascist is.
All you are doing is giving a distorted and foolish rant of talking points on one side of a discussion being debated on a national level, but pretending like you have some kind of super duper level of knowledge beyond what everyone else has.


"I didn't make any claims."

Did you post this?
"The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia."
 
Not to mention this:

⦁ Investors with ties to Uranium One and UrAsia donated millions to the foundation in 2010 and 2011. These donations were disclosed. In addition to this, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month that the Russians closed the deal for the majority stake in Uranium One. The speaking fee was one of Clinton's highest, according to The Times.
 
b. You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet

c. You are to stupidity what the Chinese are to gunpowder.

You may pin the tail on yourself.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.


Influence Effort Was Boldest Yet in the US


Russia’s effort to influence the 2016 US presidential election represented a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations aimed at US elections.

Russian Cyber Intrusions Into State and Local Electoral Boards. Russian intelligence accessed elements of multiple state or local electoral boards. Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data. We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

The next time you are honest, will be the first time.

What you dishonestly omitted.

{DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.}
 
I pointed out the US government hack job (pun intended) of this claim when this shit broke. CrowdStrike is a Ukrainian political entity that snookered the entire DNC and our moron intelligence agencies.

Hell I "retired" from "hacking" nearly two decades ago and I'm feeling embarrassed by our intelligence community - they're absolutely useless... Pathetic.


They're getting the reputation they deserve for working for the DNC.


1. "Washington (CNN)The Democratic National Committee "rebuffed" a request from the FBI to examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia during the 2016 election, a senior law enforcement official told CNN Thursday."


2. The DNC actually insisted that the FBI rely on a firm that the DNC hired....
"The FBI instead relied on the assessment from a third-party security company called CrowdStrIke."
FBI says DNC rebuffed request to examine computer servers - CNNPolitics.com



3. "What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google"
What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google | Zero Hedge



4. Soooo....if the FBI and CrowdStrike work for the DNC.....

....guess who they work against.
 
The whole Russian narrative is beyond stupid. Why would the Russians interfere in Trump's behalf when clearly the Clintons were pretty cozy with them. Also, are they really arguing that the Russians interfered in the voting process on the behalf of Trump therefore giving her 3,000,000 more votes?

Talk about taking stupid to new heights.
The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia. It was Bill who promoted NATO expansion, Hillary who exposed Putin election corruption and Russia blames Clinton influence as Sec. of State for influencing a pro-EU and anti-Russia stance in Ukraine.


"The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia."

"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


You really make this far too easy....
...is it because you such a transparent liar, or because you're abysmally stupid???

He IS a liar, but such is the way of fascist democrats.
Everything I said in my post was 100% true and accurate. You are the liar. You, not PC had addressed the comments in my post.
 
b. You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet
.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.


Influence Effort Was Boldest Yet in the US


Russia’s effort to influence the 2016 US presidential election represented a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations aimed at US elections.

Russian Cyber Intrusions Into State and Local Electoral Boards. Russian intelligence accessed elements of multiple state or local electoral boards. Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data. We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.
[


If you asked for proof of Russian involvement, why are you trying to counter it with an argument about Trump involvement.

A reminder: . You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet - Political Chic

Proof of Russian involvement -
ICA 2017-01D | 6 January 2017

You asked, I answered, so why change the subject?

[/quote]
 
The whole Russian narrative is beyond stupid. Why would the Russians interfere in Trump's behalf when clearly the Clintons were pretty cozy with them. Also, are they really arguing that the Russians interfered in the voting process on the behalf of Trump therefore giving her 3,000,000 more votes?

Talk about taking stupid to new heights.
The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia. It was Bill who promoted NATO expansion, Hillary who exposed Putin election corruption and Russia blames Clinton influence as Sec. of State for influencing a pro-EU and anti-Russia stance in Ukraine.


"The Clinton's have never been cozy with Russia."

"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance


You really make this far too easy....
...is it because you such a transparent liar, or because you're abysmally stupid???

He IS a liar, but such is the way of fascist democrats.
Everything I said in my post was 100% true and accurate. You are the liar. You, not PC had addressed the comments in my post.


I get it!
Your posts are one of those 'Truth Teller-Liar' puzzles!

This is an easy one: you're a 24-7 liar.
 
Last edited:
b. You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet

c. You are to stupidity what the Chinese are to gunpowder.

You may pin the tail on yourself.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.


Influence Effort Was Boldest Yet in the US


Russia’s effort to influence the 2016 US presidential election represented a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations aimed at US elections.

Russian Cyber Intrusions Into State and Local Electoral Boards. Russian intelligence accessed elements of multiple state or local electoral boards. Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data. We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

The next time you are honest, will be the first time.

What you dishonestly omitted.

{DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.}
All your answers are diversions. Now the diversion is to focus on Russian actors targeting tallying. Where the heck does that come from? Next you will be demanding proof that the Russians tallied votes.
 
b. You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet
.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.


Influence Effort Was Boldest Yet in the US


Russia’s effort to influence the 2016 US presidential election represented a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations aimed at US elections.

Russian Cyber Intrusions Into State and Local Electoral Boards. Russian intelligence accessed elements of multiple state or local electoral boards. Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data. We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge[/.
QUOTE]

If you asked for proof of Russian involvement, why are you trying to counter it with an argument about Trump involvement.

A reminder: . You have been unable to find any intelligence agency that claims evidence of Russian involvemet - Political Chic

Proof of Russian involvement -
ICA 2017-01D | 6 January 2017

You asked, I answered, so why change the subject?


Soooo....there's no quote that says they have evidence??


Excellent.
 
The next time you are honest, will be the first time.

What you dishonestly omitted.

{DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.}

The question was on Russian influence, not on specific influences. It's been long established Russia didn't access voting tabulation equipment, but the intelligence assessment of Russian influence is clear. and given that with high probability.
 
All your answers are diversions. Now the diversion is to focus on Russian actors targeting tallying. Where the heck does that come from? Next you will be demanding proof that the Russians tallied votes.

It's a diversion from Russian involvement. To disprove one type of involvement, as if it disproves all Russian involvement. As Eric Clapton said, 'I shot the sheriff, but I didn't shoot the deputy.' Well no body asked if you shot the deputy. And that has nothing to do with shooting the sheriff.
 
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.


Russian Cyber Intrusions Into State and Local Electoral Boards. Russian intelligence accessed elements of multiple state or local electoral boards. Since early 2014, Russian intelligence has researched US electoral processes and related technology and equipment.


Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data. We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets.


Soooo....there's no quote that says they have evidence??

Excellent.

This report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA), which draws on intelligence information collected and disseminated by those three agencies. It covers the motivation and scope of Moscow’s intentions regarding US elections and Moscow’s use of cyber tools and media campaigns to influence US public opinion. The assessment focuses on activities aimed at the 2016 US presidential election and draws on our understanding of previous Russian influence operations. When we use the term "we" it refers to an assessment by all three agencies.


 This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment. This document’s conclusions are identical to the highly classified assessment, but this document does not include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence on key elements of the influence campaign. Given the redactions, we made minor edits purely for readability and flow.
 
Your'e really taking your role as a Putin supporter seriously. How much is Vlad paying you?



Translation:

"I wish I could find even a single error in these posts....they utterly destroy my most deeply held worldviews!"
No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports.
The full court press by the Left and it's allies is to support their failed candidate and failed policies.
I think it's payback for Benghazi investigations that repeated ad nauseum. This, unfortunately, will no doubt play out the same way, and its adherents will not believe the results, no matter what is found. Bank on it.

"No, you are just positing something before the investigations are completed. By two committees and the FBI. I'm willing to wait until the people who know what's going on give us their reports."

Your wait is over, Windy....


"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


You're just vomiting old news. Clapper has left the government. RussiaGate is about more than Russia interfering with the election. It is an investigation of how much interference in what forms and with whose assistance. You should be as interested in knowing that as anyone else. Defending Trump and his administration has thrown you on the side of the Russians, it seems like to me. I would prefer foreign countries stay out of it when we elect our leaders. Wouldn't you? Then quit barking at the moon and wait for the information.



Soooo.....which current heads of intelligence agencies claim there is any evidence of Russian involvement, Windy?


None?


Which brings up this query.....we proved earlier that you are one of our best sources of Greenhouse Gases....
...so, why are you back with more of the same?

None, which is as it should be, since THEY AREN'T FINISHED, yet. Unlike some Trump supporters who will endlessly spin the arguments to say he is innocent and it's proven already, the heads of intelligence and everyone else with a brain will wait for the FBI and the Intelligence Committees to finish their investigations.
 
[
This is why you are called unhinged. I didn't make any claims.

Of course you did. The fascist democratic party floated ALL of these lies, with you cheer leading all the way down the line. WHAT are you talking about?

You are attacking and slandering me because you do not have the wit or intelligence to articulate your views.You need insults and slander to bolster you bullshyt. There has to be a bad guy in your hate filled rant. Also, I am not a fascist and you would not know a fascist if you saw one. You don't have a clue about what a fascist is.
All you are doing is giving a distorted and foolish rant of talking points on one side of a discussion being debated on a national level, but pretending like you have some kind of super duper level of knowledge beyond what everyone else has.

Quick sploogy, here is a quiz:

Prior to forming the Fascisti, Benito Mussolini was head of what?

  1. The reely iz two uh rite wing party
  2. The Elect Donald Trump party
  3. The Italian Bolshevik party

Benito Mussolini was editor in chief of the underground magazine "Avanti," which advocated what?

  1. Capitalist investment strategies
  2. Christian ethics and a pious lifestyle
  3. A violent Marxist revolution and establishment of Communism in Italy in conjunction with Vladimir Lenin
Yeah, I know you don't have the answers, you know "jack" and "shit" about Fascism, you just parrot lies you have been trained to recite

You ARE a fascist, as is your party, You advocate for a centrally managed and planned economy. You support severe restrictions on individual liberty, particularly speech and religion (hate speech, Hobby Lobby, Citizens United, et a.)

You are a fascist, that is simply fact. That you leftists got away with the BIG LIE that "fascism is right wing" for decades is irrelevant. Once you lost absolute control over the information people have, that lie fell apart. Only ridiculous morons try and float that idiocy anymore.

Fascism is a totalitarian system based on central control and privilege assigned to groups such as black, Hispanic, gay, transgender, et al. rather than rights which accrue to individuals, regardless of group membership. You are a fascist because you promote the agenda of fascism, an authoritarian state with extreme limitations on the rights of a disarmed public.

You are a fascist, your party is fascist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top