- Thread starter
- #1,401
If you're saying you actually don't know that people think we need government marriage and tax breaks to make it more realistic for families to have and afford children, then I'm calling you a liar, you do know that. That is the "concept" of marriage
So you say citing you.
I work. My wife stays home to care for our home and kids. Explain again why my gender and the gender of my spouse determines why I don't deserve this tax break in your estimation?
You can't make babies. You meaning the marriage, not you as an individual. You can live together and adopt or make them in a test tube, I'm good with that. Just no reason I should pay for it
You don't pay a penny for it. You pay for the couples WITH children.
Are you too fucking retarded to understand that?
No, you're too fucking retarded to know that tax rates for joint filers are lower than single rates and government married couples don't pay estate tax when they leave unlimited money to each other
Where's the child requirement in either of those tax laws?
![wtf :wtf: :wtf:](/styles/smilies/wtf.gif)