In other words, you magnify everything Obama's done and minimalize everything Bush had done.
Could you tell me how being an editor of a law review qualifies you to be President?
Not at all. If you want to magnify what Bush has done, have at it. But be prepared for it to be shot down in flames.
It's not being the editor of law review itself that qualifies him, it's the whole package. What he has done with his life. There are those that see the words 'community 'organiser' and say it equals 'Marxist' without even looking into what he did for those three years. Getting up every day trying to sort out problems in some of the poorest parts of Chicago. Trying to make a crappy and corrupt political system work. People assume - with no evidence - that because he was from Chicago, he is somehow tainted. Why? Where is the proof? That a huge problem I have found on these messageboards with a lot of right wingers, is they live in a sound bite world and don't look deeply, or try and be curious about how it really was. They are almost a microcosm of the Bush mindset....
Are you talking about the guy who votes "present"? Yes, that IS a sign of some great leadership.