Why the Current Liberal Dominated Political System is About to Crash

[M14 Shooter]

Socialism was introduced as part of the American economic system by Ben Franklin. Socialism in hand with Capitalism are practiced by virtually all countries in the world today. A victory for common sense.

Could you further enlighten me as to Franklins socialism?

The postal system and postal roads.

Clearly, you are ignorant of meaning of the term "socialiism", in any of tis legitimate forms.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You are, of course, wrong.

You and I both know it is impossible for you to demonstrate how I am wrong.

You asserted it. Prove it.

As I said - you and I both know it is impossible for you to demonstrate how I am wrong.
Thank you for proving my point.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You are, of course, wrong.

You and I both know it is impossible for you to demonstrate how I am wrong.

But he will keep saying it to try and goad you into getting banned.

And he shall fail.
Just like his arguments.

 

[PMZ]

talk to ya'll tomorrow!

Let me know if there are any issues...

Look it up, numbnuts.

Business where the means of production are publically owned.

 

[PMZ]

You and I both know it is impossible for you to demonstrate how I am wrong.

You asserted it. Prove it.

As I said - you and I both know it is impossible for you to demonstrate how I am wrong.
Thank you for proving my point.

The point that you make up stuff and post it? Glad to do it.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Perhaps, but only if one ignores "Only some of them are a problem," which I am sure was an innocent reading comprehension mistake.

Explains a whole lot, however.

No, it wasn't ignored.

Then, what, you just have a reading comprehension issue here then?

I stated, "We are mostly fortunate to have the wealthy folks we have as most are self-made and good solid church going people. Only some of them are a problem and most of those are in the top management at international corporations or Wall Street banks. These I think are the kinds of people the guillotines and firing squads were made for."

If I say most of group A are Green, but some of group A are blue, and of those blue some of them border on being violet, you would think I don't know the difference between green and violet?

Dude, critical thinking courses are available.

Would Jesus tell you to kill those who were only guilty of stealing?

Jesus doesn't tell me to do things, seriously, you have issues.

Your OP is premised upon the falsehood that "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people".

You then erroneously blame "liberals";

...The simple fact that $85 BILLION is given away each month to Wall Street banks from the Federal Reserve system and its member banks have still never been fully audited, nor its gold holdings says it quite plain; WE WORK FOR THEM. The liberals think this is better for everyone, but there is a growing realization that it only serves the top of the economy and the CEO earnings to employee average wage ratio in the US is ten times higher than the vast majority of First World nations.
...When all this starts to roll out, it will be a dangerous time and it is slowly unfolding before our eyes already, again , Obamacare being a top example.

And equate them to Wall St and CEO's with this falsehood;

most of those are in the top management at international corporations or Wall Street banks.

Then you pass a summary judgement of GUILTY and impose the death sentence.

These I think are the kinds of people the guillotines and firing squads were made for

That is how you are coming across here. Somehow these "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people" are 100% right and everything else is the fault of "evil liberals" who you have already condemned to death.

These are your own words. Feel free to refute them because they aren't doing you any favors.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Socialism was introduced as part of the American economic system by Ben Franklin. Socialism in hand with Capitalism are practiced by virtually all countries in the world today. A victory for common sense.

Could you further enlighten me as to Franklins socialism?

The postal system and postal roads.

Those are common government functions that well preceded the conception of socialism as an economic theory or political ideology.

That is a very dishonest and misleading statement.

As to how that reflects on your integrity, the reader can decide for themselves.

 

[JimBowie1958]

You and I both know it is impossible for you to demonstrate how I am wrong.

But he will keep saying it to try and goad you into getting banned.

And he shall fail.
Just like his arguments.

And continue to bump the thread, lol.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Hilarious. rotflmao

No, it wasn't ignored.

Then, what, you just have a reading comprehension issue here then?

I stated, "We are mostly fortunate to have the wealthy folks we have as most are self-made and good solid church going people. Only some of them are a problem and most of those are in the top management at international corporations or Wall Street banks. These I think are the kinds of people the guillotines and firing squads were made for."

If I say most of group A are Green, but some of group A are blue, and of those blue some of them border on being violet, you would think I don't know the difference between green and violet?

Dude, critical thinking courses are available.



Jesus doesn't tell me to do things, seriously, you have issues.

Your OP is premised upon the falsehood that "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people".

In the context you removed it from, I was referring to self-made wealthy people, and went into more detail elsewhere, and you h ave not demonstated how my assertionis false, you simply make another unwarranted assertion.

I dont mean to talk over your h ead, you do know what an unwarranted assertion is, right?

You then erroneously blame "liberals";

No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole.

And equate them to Wall St and CEO's with this falsehood;

most of those are in the top management at international corporations or Wall Street banks.

I am not saying that the CEO's and Wall street banks are liberals, no, lol, their ideology is greed, which isnt always a bad thing.

Then you pass a summary judgement of GUILTY and impose the death sentence.

These I think are the kinds of people the guillotines and firing squads were made for

And they were made for those kinds of people, but I never said that I want them killed, etc, merely noting the historical FACTS of the matter, something liberals have trouble with.

That is how you are coming across here.

No, that is how you are trying to spin my post, but that is not a fair reading at all.

Somehow these "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people" are 100% right and everything else is the fault of "evil liberals" who you have already condemned to death.

No, I did not. You are twisting what I said.

These are your own words. Feel free to refute them because they aren't doing you any favors.

1. I dont want any favors, and

2. I am confident that a fair reading of my post would show that none of what you have said about my posts is true.

 

[JimBowie1958]

talk to ya'll tomorrow!

Let me know if there are any issues...

Look it up, numbnuts.

Business where the means of production are publically owned.

Not in every case. Some theories of socialism leave most production in private hands and only heavy industry is publicly owned.

Shame it doesn't actually work in the real world.

 

[PMZ]

Could you further enlighten me as to Franklins socialism?

The postal system and postal roads.

Those are common government functions that well preceded the conception of socialism as an economic theory or political ideology.

That is a very dishonest and misleading statement.

As to how that reflects on your integrity, the reader can decide for themselves.

I am proud of my proper use of English and object to special interests trying to pervert it to their own use.

 

[PMZ]

Hilarious. rotflmao

Then, what, you just have a reading comprehension issue here then?

I stated, "We are mostly fortunate to have the wealthy folks we have as most are self-made and good solid church going people. Only some of them are a problem and most of those are in the top management at international corporations or Wall Street banks. These I think are the kinds of people the guillotines and firing squads were made for."

If I say most of group A are Green, but some of group A are blue, and of those blue some of them border on being violet, you would think I don't know the difference between green and violet?

Dude, critical thinking courses are available.



Jesus doesn't tell me to do things, seriously, you have issues.

Your OP is premised upon the falsehood that "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people".

In the context you removed it from, I was referring to self-made wealthy people, and went into more detail elsewhere, and you h ave not demonstated how my assertionis false, you simply make another unwarranted assertion.

I dont mean to talk over your h ead, you do know what an unwarranted assertion is, right?



No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole.



I am not saying that the CEO's and Wall street banks are liberals, no, lol, their ideology is greed, which isnt always a bad thing.



And they were made for those kinds of people, but I never said that I want them killed, etc, merely noting the historical FACTS of the matter, something liberals have trouble with.



No, that is how you are trying to spin my post, but that is not a fair reading at all.

Somehow these "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people" are 100% right and everything else is the fault of "evil liberals" who you have already condemned to death.

No, I did not. You are twisting what I said.

These are your own words. Feel free to refute them because they aren't doing you any favors.

1. I dont want any favors, and

2. I am confident that a fair reading of my post would show that none of what you have said about my posts is true.

"No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole."

Nothing true here. Propaganda scapegoating.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The postal system and postal roads.

Those are common government functions that well preceded the conception of socialism as an economic theory or political ideology.

That is a very dishonest and misleading statement.

As to how that reflects on your integrity, the reader can decide for themselves.

I am proud of my proper use of English ....

The last refuge of a liberal?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Hilarious. rotflmao

Your OP is premised upon the falsehood that "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people".

In the context you removed it from, I was referring to self-made wealthy people, and went into more detail elsewhere, and you h ave not demonstated how my assertionis false, you simply make another unwarranted assertion.

I dont mean to talk over your h ead, you do know what an unwarranted assertion is, right?

No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole.

I am not saying that the CEO's and Wall street banks are liberals, no, lol, their ideology is greed, which isnt always a bad thing.

And they were made for those kinds of people, but I never said that I want them killed, etc, merely noting the historical FACTS of the matter, something liberals have trouble with.

No, that is how you are trying to spin my post, but that is not a fair reading at all.

No, I did not. You are twisting what I said.

These are your own words. Feel free to refute them because they aren't doing you any favors.

1. I dont want any favors, and

2. I am confident that a fair reading of my post would show that none of what you have said about my posts is true.

"No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole."

Nothing true here. Propaganda scapegoating.

rpflmao, a good demonstration of unwarranted assertion for anyone interested.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Hilarious. rotflmao

Then, what, you just have a reading comprehension issue here then?

I stated, "We are mostly fortunate to have the wealthy folks we have as most are self-made and good solid church going people. Only some of them are a problem and most of those are in the top management at international corporations or Wall Street banks. These I think are the kinds of people the guillotines and firing squads were made for."

If I say most of group A are Green, but some of group A are blue, and of those blue some of them border on being violet, you would think I don't know the difference between green and violet?

Dude, critical thinking courses are available.



Jesus doesn't tell me to do things, seriously, you have issues.

Your OP is premised upon the falsehood that "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people".

In the context you removed it from, I was referring to self-made wealthy people, and went into more detail elsewhere, and you h ave not demonstated how my assertionis false, you simply make another unwarranted assertion.

I dont mean to talk over your h ead, you do know what an unwarranted assertion is, right?



No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole.



I am not saying that the CEO's and Wall street banks are liberals, no, lol, their ideology is greed, which isnt always a bad thing.

And they were made for those kinds of people, but I never said that I want them killed, etc, merely noting the historical FACTS of the matter, something liberals have trouble with.

No, that is how you are trying to spin my post, but that is not a fair reading at all.

Somehow these "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people" are 100% right and everything else is the fault of "evil liberals" who you have already condemned to death.

No, I did not. You are twisting what I said.

These are your own words. Feel free to refute them because they aren't doing you any favors.

1. I dont want any favors, and

2. I am confident that a fair reading of my post would show that none of what you have said about my posts is true.

They were your own words!

 

[JimBowie1958]

Hilarious. rotflmao

Your OP is premised upon the falsehood that "wealthy folks ... are self-made and good solid church going people".

In the context you removed it from, I was referring to self-made wealthy people, and went into more detail elsewhere, and you h ave not demonstated how my assertionis false, you simply make another unwarranted assertion.

I dont mean to talk over your h ead, you do know what an unwarranted assertion is, right?



No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole.



I am not saying that the CEO's and Wall street banks are liberals, no, lol, their ideology is greed, which isnt always a bad thing.

No, that is how you are trying to spin my post, but that is not a fair reading at all.



No, I did not. You are twisting what I said.

These are your own words. Feel free to refute them because they aren't doing you any favors.

1. I dont want any favors, and

2. I am confident that a fair reading of my post would show that none of what you have said about my posts is true.

They were your own words!

I think a reader could be forgiven, if after reading your posts on this thread, if they felt deep remorse that this is what passes for the heirs of John Kenneth Galbraith and Bertrand Russell; a wreckage and a ruin. A wasteland devoid of value or beauty.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Hilarious. rotflmao



In the context you removed it from, I was referring to self-made wealthy people, and went into more detail elsewhere, and you h ave not demonstated how my assertionis false, you simply make another unwarranted assertion.

I dont mean to talk over your h ead, you do know what an unwarranted assertion is, right?



No, I said liberals think that the current CEO culture of alienation from the common people is a good thing, by and large, because most liberals these days are elitists and they generally do things to promote an insulation of our government fromthe common peole.



I am not saying that the CEO's and Wall street banks are liberals, no, lol, their ideology is greed, which isnt always a bad thing.

No, that is how you are trying to spin my post, but that is not a fair reading at all.



No, I did not. You are twisting what I said.



1. I dont want any favors, and

2. I am confident that a fair reading of my post would show that none of what you have said about my posts is true.

They were your own words!

I think a reader could be forgiven, if after reading your posts on this thread, if they felt deep remorse that this is what passes for the heirs of John Kenneth Galbraith and Bertrand Russell; a wreckage and a ruin. A wasteland devoid of value or beauty.

Drowning in denial is symptomatic of those who cannot face the reality of what their own words reveal about themselves.

 

[JimBowie1958]

They were your own words!

I think a reader could be forgiven, if after reading your posts on this thread, if they felt deep remorse that this is what passes for the heirs of John Kenneth Galbraith and Bertrand Russell; a wreckage and a ruin. A wasteland devoid of value or beauty.

Drowning in denial is symptomatic of those who cannot face the reality of what their own words reveal about themselves.

Lol, or those who accuse others of what they project from their own heart.

Enough of your unsupported accusations which are totally off the topic.

You can say what you wish, I don't care what you think.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You asserted it. Prove it.

As I said - you and I both know it is impossible for you to demonstrate how I am wrong.
Thank you for proving my point.

The point that you make up stuff and post it? Glad to do it.

Thank you for again proving that you know it is impossible for you demonstrate how I am wrong.

 

[M14 Shooter]

talk to ya'll tomorrow!

Let me know if there are any issues...

Look it up, numbnuts.

Business where the means of production are publically owned.

Not in every case. Some theories of socialism leave most production in private hands and only heavy industry is publicly owned.

Shame it doesn't actually work in the real world.

What's thhat? PMZ doesn't know what socialism is? Shocking.