Why the left wing embraces radical muslim terrorists....

[Tommy Tainant]

John Hawkins - Why Liberals Support Muslims Who Hate Everything They Stand For

Mr. Hawkins doesn't know what a liberal is much less a cognitive thought...

The fabian socialists have hijacked the term "liberal" and have made it about collectivism instead of individual rights. They have taken away the comfort of free thinking to everyone has to march in lockstep.

The liberals of today are nothing but communists.

Exactly, thank you. The socialists have to keep changing the word they use because as soon as people realize what they are about, they change their name.......they used to call themselves progressives.....now they call themselves liberals....and they are reverting back to Progressive since "liberal" is now too closely associated with what the socialists actually are and do...

"Liberals" are way older than "socialists" --- the former wrote our Constitution. And "Progressives" came after both of them, roughly 1890 to 1920. Those are three different things that, in the latter's period, all existed concurrently. The fact that you can't be bothered to learn basic political science terminology, yet want to use them to fling like monkey turds, is entirely irrelevant to their actual definitions. That's on you.

Meanwhile you have yet to demonstrate what the fuck your OP title is yammering about. Mac has been standing in for you while you ran away, failing to demonstrate the same thing. Now that you're back you can take over. So please, do regale us all with still yet more concrete examples of that which you cannot explain.

EDIT - I didn't notice the dateline and mistakenly gave the OP credit for returning to the scene of his crime. Evidently he did not -- he simply ran away. Sorry Mac, you're still holding the bag.

Mac is just phoning it in today. He is holding a weak hand.

 

[bodecea]

I'd like to hear the names of the American liberals who support Islamic extremist terrorism. I'd like to hear enough of those names so that one can label that sentiment as characteristic of American liberals in general,

as the retard who started this troll thread is claiming.

What we have are American rightwing muslims pretending they are not.

 

[Pogo]

So, as we see on this thread, the distortions, misrepresentations and personal attacks begin.

Oh, Mac, I'm sorry the scary Arab made you soil your shorts that one time...

Dogmaphobe, see? Just a few moments after I predicted it.

This is who they are. They're "defending" the "oppressed", and part of that is attacking on the "behalf" of the "oppressed", regardless of the consequences.

Like clockwork. Absolutely fascinating.
.

What in the wide world of blue fuck are you even talking about here?

Where do you see any "defending any oppressed" in that post? He's mocking YOU. Directly.
If anything's being "oppressed" its the fallacy of Appeal to Emotion.

 

[bodecea]

Commies and Islamic Theocrats have one thing in common. They are anti-individual-liberty authoritarian statists with the same convert-or-die policy.

They are the same.

It's becoming more and more obvious that the RW people here are really radical muslims or certainly fellow travelers.

 

[Mac1958]

So, as we see on this thread, the distortions, misrepresentations and personal attacks begin.

Oh, Mac, I'm sorry the scary Arab made you soil your shorts that one time...

Dogmaphobe, see? Just a few moments after I predicted it.

This is who they are. They're "defending" the "oppressed", and part of that is attacking on the "behalf" of the "oppressed", regardless of the consequences.

Like clockwork. Absolutely fascinating.
.

What in the wide world of blue fuck are you even talking about here?

Where do you see any "defending any oppressed" in that post? He's mocking YOU. Directly.
If anything's being "oppressed" its the fallacy of Appeal to Emotion.

And another Regressive jumps in.

Welcome, and thanks for the valuable input.
.

 

[Pogo]

So, as we see on this thread, the distortions, misrepresentations and personal attacks begin.

Oh, Mac, I'm sorry the scary Arab made you soil your shorts that one time...

Dogmaphobe, see? Just a few moments after I predicted it.

This is who they are. They're "defending" the "oppressed", and part of that is attacking on the "behalf" of the "oppressed", regardless of the consequences.

Like clockwork. Absolutely fascinating.
.

What in the wide world of blue fuck are you even talking about here?

Where do you see any "defending any oppressed" in that post? He's mocking YOU. Directly.
If anything's being "oppressed" its the fallacy of Appeal to Emotion.

And another Regressive jumps in.

Welcome, and thanks for the valuable input.
.

Link?

Hey, I made the observation of basic what-fucking-words-mean. Prove that observation wrong and quit this limpwristed pussyfooting of calling names you can't demonstrate. I invited you to explain the post and all you have is "humma humma regressive humma humma". You've got enough hummas here to start a middle eastern restaurant. And in fact your increasingly vacuous posts are becoming a PITA.

Have you devolved completely to the level of Troll with no point then? You're sounding more and more like that klown whose every post consists of nothing more substantial than "far left drone!"

Pathetic. So many posts, so little accomplished.

 

[Dale Smith]

Again......show me where Jesus said....."go ahead, murder gays." Since he never said that, anyone who advocates for that is not following Christ's Teachings and is not a Christian....

Moron....

Oh, I see. So it is possible that some people claiming to belong to a particular religion are not REAL members of that religion?

Huh!

But apparently it is also possible that someone who knows fuck-all about a different religion pretend they do, based on shit they parrot from their propaganda outlets.

I wonder then...in his fevered mind...who the real Muslims are?
The ones that go out and blow themselves up and murder innocent people...or those that don't?

The tards think the refugees who are fleeing the terrorists are the bad guys. These tards are no different than the fuckwads who turned away the Jews fleeing Hitler.

So they clearly believe the terrorists are the real Muslims.

You know, like these guys are the true Christians:

Those are democrats....Christians don't hate.....many democrats pretend to be Christians to get votes...but their hatred, jealousy and greed clearly show they are not Christians in any sense of the word....

Ah here's the post I was trying to click.

Those are not in any observable way "democrats" -- which means people who believe in democracy. Nor are they Democrats, which is the name of a political party. They're not up there to vote so we have no idea which of them, if any, are registered to vote at all. And we know they're not democrats because we know they are fascists.

What we also know is that they're Christians. We know that because it's a prerequisite for joining the Klan. That organization was founded with a burning cross, an unsheathed sword and a bible. It's mandatory.

Now the poster's point sailing blithely over your pointed head here is that we could take this group of Christians --- we know for a fact they're Christians --- and attribute every lynching, every whipping, every bombing or act of other destruction that they do and, via the exact same Composition Fallacy you brought in here like a load in your pants and proceeded to dump ---- to "Christianism".

And that would be the same fallacy you're already using. It's your own logic, looking back at you in the mirror, dumb shit. Expressed another way, "correlation is not causation". You probably don't have a clue in the world what that means but again --- that ignorance is on you.

As for your blanket generalization fallacy above, to wit "Christians don't hate", go ahead and explain Eric Rudolph. Or John Salvi. Or Tim McVeigh. Or Scott Roeder. Or Adolf Hitler.

Nothing's changed, Dumbass --- you trot fallacies in here, they WILL be shot down. Wid a quickness.

Eric Rudolph was a Zionist, John Salvi and Adolf Hitler belonged to the cult that is the catholic church and Timothy McVeigh was in black-ops and the patsy of the OKC bombing and saw nothing in his background that showed he was a Christian.
Scott Roeder? Don't support what he did but the fact that George "killer" Tiller was allowed to perform late term abortions is beyond disgusting but yet leftards supported his "practice".......

 

[Mac1958]

So, as we see on this thread, the distortions, misrepresentations and personal attacks begin.

Oh, Mac, I'm sorry the scary Arab made you soil your shorts that one time...

Dogmaphobe, see? Just a few moments after I predicted it.

This is who they are. They're "defending" the "oppressed", and part of that is attacking on the "behalf" of the "oppressed", regardless of the consequences.

Like clockwork. Absolutely fascinating.
.

What in the wide world of blue fuck are you even talking about here?

Where do you see any "defending any oppressed" in that post? He's mocking YOU. Directly.
If anything's being "oppressed" its the fallacy of Appeal to Emotion.

And another Regressive jumps in.

Welcome, and thanks for the valuable input.
.

Link?

Hey, I made the observation of basic what-fucking-words-mean. Prove that observation wrong and quit this limpwristed pussyfooting of calling names you can't demonstrate.

Have you devolved completely to the level of Troll with no point then? You're sounding more and more like that klown whose every post consists of nothing more substantial than "far left drone!"

Pathetic. So many posts, so little accomplished.

 

[Dale Smith]

This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

• Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
• Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
• That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.

As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:

I am a liberal and I do not approve of you radical muslims.

You are a militant fabian socialist, Buttecea.....nothing more, nothing less.

 

[Pogo]

John Hawkins - Why Liberals Support Muslims Who Hate Everything They Stand For

Mr. Hawkins doesn't know what a liberal is much less a cognitive thought...

The fabian socialists have hijacked the term "liberal" and have made it about collectivism instead of individual rights. They have taken away the comfort of free thinking to everyone has to march in lockstep.

The liberals of today are nothing but communists.

Exactly, thank you. The socialists have to keep changing the word they use because as soon as people realize what they are about, they change their name.......they used to call themselves progressives.....now they call themselves liberals....and they are reverting back to Progressive since "liberal" is now too closely associated with what the socialists actually are and do...

"Liberals" are way older than "socialists" --- the former wrote our Constitution. And "Progressives" came after both of them, roughly 1890 to 1920. Those are three different things that, in the latter's period, all existed concurrently. The fact that you can't be bothered to learn basic political science terminology, yet want to use them to fling like monkey turds, is entirely irrelevant to their actual definitions. That's on you.

Meanwhile you have yet to demonstrate what the fuck your OP title is yammering about. Mac has been standing in for you while you ran away, failing to demonstrate the same thing. Now that you're back you can take over. So please, do regale us all with still yet more concrete examples of that which you cannot explain.

EDIT - I didn't notice the dateline and mistakenly gave the OP credit for returning to the scene of his crime. Evidently he did not -- he simply ran away. Sorry Mac, you're still holding the bag.

Mac is just phoning it in today. He is holding a weak hand.

Looks to me like he's playing that old fun game called "52 pick up".

 

[Dale Smith]

Mr. Hawkins doesn't know what a liberal is much less a cognitive thought...

The fabian socialists have hijacked the term "liberal" and have made it about collectivism instead of individual rights. They have taken away the comfort of free thinking to everyone has to march in lockstep.

The liberals of today are nothing but communists.

Exactly, thank you. The socialists have to keep changing the word they use because as soon as people realize what they are about, they change their name.......they used to call themselves progressives.....now they call themselves liberals....and they are reverting back to Progressive since "liberal" is now too closely associated with what the socialists actually are and do...

"Liberals" are way older than "socialists" --- the former wrote our Constitution. And "Progressives" came after both of them, roughly 1890 to 1920. Those are three different things that, in the latter's period, all existed concurrently. The fact that you can't be bothered to learn basic political science terminology, yet want to use them to fling like monkey turds, is entirely irrelevant to their actual definitions. That's on you.

Meanwhile you have yet to demonstrate what the fuck your OP title is yammering about. Mac has been standing in for you while you ran away, failing to demonstrate the same thing. Now that you're back you can take over. So please, do regale us all with still yet more concrete examples of that which you cannot explain.

EDIT - I didn't notice the dateline and mistakenly gave the OP credit for returning to the scene of his crime. Evidently he did not -- he simply ran away. Sorry Mac, you're still holding the bag.

Mac is just phoning it in today. He is holding a weak hand.

Looks to me like he's playing that old fun game called "52 pick up".

Mac is holding his own and some of yours as well, Pogo........you are all over the place while not making any sense.

 

[bodecea]

This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

• Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
• Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
• That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.

As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:

I am a liberal and I do not approve of you radical muslims.

You are a militant fabian socialist, Buttecea.....nothing more, nothing less.

It's amusing to watch the paranoid backwards muslims and fellowtravelers post here with their falsehoods and middle east superstitions....like chemtrails.......

 

[Lastamender]

Commies and Islamic Theocrats have one thing in common. They are anti-individual-liberty authoritarian statists with the same convert-or-die policy.

They are the same.

It's becoming more and more obvious that the RW people here are really radical muslims or certainly fellow travelers.

Projection on your part. Not working.

 

[jillian]

This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

• Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
• Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
• That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.

As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:

who embraces terrorism except for people like you who tried to justify a terrorist Neo nazi driving a car into peaceful protestersmand killing a young woman.

 

[Dale Smith]

This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

• Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
• Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
• That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.

As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:

I am a liberal and I do not approve of you radical muslims.

You are a militant fabian socialist, Buttecea.....nothing more, nothing less.

It's amusing to watch the paranoid backwards muslims and fellowtravelers post here with their falsehoods and middle east superstitions....like chemtrails.......

Needless to say, Buttecea, I am STILL waiting on your first thoughtful and insightful piece of prose that isn't full of vitriol and anger..........

 

[Pogo]

Oh, I see. So it is possible that some people claiming to belong to a particular religion are not REAL members of that religion?

Huh!

But apparently it is also possible that someone who knows fuck-all about a different religion pretend they do, based on shit they parrot from their propaganda outlets.

I wonder then...in his fevered mind...who the real Muslims are?
The ones that go out and blow themselves up and murder innocent people...or those that don't?

The tards think the refugees who are fleeing the terrorists are the bad guys. These tards are no different than the fuckwads who turned away the Jews fleeing Hitler.

So they clearly believe the terrorists are the real Muslims.

You know, like these guys are the true Christians:

Those are democrats....Christians don't hate.....many democrats pretend to be Christians to get votes...but their hatred, jealousy and greed clearly show they are not Christians in any sense of the word....

Ah here's the post I was trying to click.

Those are not in any observable way "democrats" -- which means people who believe in democracy. Nor are they Democrats, which is the name of a political party. They're not up there to vote so we have no idea which of them, if any, are registered to vote at all. And we know they're not democrats because we know they are fascists.

What we also know is that they're Christians. We know that because it's a prerequisite for joining the Klan. That organization was founded with a burning cross, an unsheathed sword and a bible. It's mandatory.

Now the poster's point sailing blithely over your pointed head here is that we could take this group of Christians --- we know for a fact they're Christians --- and attribute every lynching, every whipping, every bombing or act of other destruction that they do and, via the exact same Composition Fallacy you brought in here like a load in your pants and proceeded to dump ---- to "Christianism".

And that would be the same fallacy you're already using. It's your own logic, looking back at you in the mirror, dumb shit. Expressed another way, "correlation is not causation". You probably don't have a clue in the world what that means but again --- that ignorance is on you.

As for your blanket generalization fallacy above, to wit "Christians don't hate", go ahead and explain Eric Rudolph. Or John Salvi. Or Tim McVeigh. Or Scott Roeder. Or Adolf Hitler.

Nothing's changed, Dumbass --- you trot fallacies in here, they WILL be shot down. Wid a quickness.

Eric Rudolph was a Zionist, John Salvi and Adolf Hitler belonged to the cult that is the catholic church and Timothy McVeigh was in black-ops and the patsy of the OKC bombing and saw nothing in his background that showed he was a Christian.
Scott Roeder? Don't support what he did but the fact that George "killer" Tiller was allowed to perform late term abortions is beyond disgusting but yet leftards supported his "practice".......

ALL irrelevant. Religion does not preclude politics; one can be (and many are) Christians while being Zionists, the IRA, Klanners (required), haters, masturbators, child daters, self-saters or bad check-writers. Christians (or Jews or Buddhists or Muslims or atheists) can be shooters, tooters, looters or polluters. None are mutually exclusive.

The poster's claim was "Christians don't hate". I gave him (<< again that's HIM, not "you") myriad examples to refute. The poster was (again) dumping a logical fallacy and (again) got his ass nailed on it.

And Catholics are fucking Christians Dumbass --- we were the first ones.

 

[Dale Smith]

This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

• Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
• Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
• That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.

As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:

who embraces terrorism except for people like you who tried to justify a terrorist Neo nazi driving a car into peaceful protestersmand killing a young woman.

LMAO! You mean the staged "Charlottesville Attack"?????

 

[Lastamender]

This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

• Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
• Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
• That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.

As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:

I am a liberal and I do not approve of you radical muslims.

You are a militant fabian socialist, Buttecea.....nothing more, nothing less.

It's amusing to watch the paranoid backwards muslims and fellowtravelers post here with their falsehoods and middle east superstitions....like chemtrails.......

I wonder then...in his fevered mind...who the real Muslims are?
The ones that go out and blow themselves up and murder innocent people...or those that don't?

The tards think the refugees who are fleeing the terrorists are the bad guys. These tards are no different than the fuckwads who turned away the Jews fleeing Hitler.

So they clearly believe the terrorists are the real Muslims.

You know, like these guys are the true Christians:

Those are democrats....Christians don't hate.....many democrats pretend to be Christians to get votes...but their hatred, jealousy and greed clearly show they are not Christians in any sense of the word....

Ah here's the post I was trying to click.

Those are not in any observable way "democrats" -- which means people who believe in democracy. Nor are they Democrats, which is the name of a political party. They're not up there to vote so we have no idea which of them, if any, are registered to vote at all. And we know they're not democrats because we know they are fascists.

What we also know is that they're Christians. We know that because it's a prerequisite for joining the Klan. That organization was founded with a burning cross, an unsheathed sword and a bible. It's mandatory.

Now the poster's point sailing blithely over your pointed head here is that we could take this group of Christians --- we know for a fact they're Christians --- and attribute every lynching, every whipping, every bombing or act of other destruction that they do and, via the exact same Composition Fallacy you brought in here like a load in your pants and proceeded to dump ---- to "Christianism".

And that would be the same fallacy you're already using. It's your own logic, looking back at you in the mirror, dumb shit. Expressed another way, "correlation is not causation". You probably don't have a clue in the world what that means but again --- that ignorance is on you.

As for your blanket generalization fallacy above, to wit "Christians don't hate", go ahead and explain Eric Rudolph. Or John Salvi. Or Tim McVeigh. Or Scott Roeder. Or Adolf Hitler.

Nothing's changed, Dumbass --- you trot fallacies in here, they WILL be shot down. Wid a quickness.

Eric Rudolph was a Zionist, John Salvi and Adolf Hitler belonged to the cult that is the catholic church and Timothy McVeigh was in black-ops and the patsy of the OKC bombing and saw nothing in his background that showed he was a Christian.
Scott Roeder? Don't support what he did but the fact that George "killer" Tiller was allowed to perform late term abortions is beyond disgusting but yet leftards supported his "practice".......

ALL irrelevant. Religion does not preclude politics; one can be (and many are) Christians while being Zionists, the IRA, Klanners (required), haters, masturbators, child daters, self-saters or bad check-writers.

The poster's claim was "Christians don't hate". I gave him (<< again that's HIM, not "you") myriad examples to refute.

And Catholics are fucking Christians Dumbass --- we were the first ones.

What does the doctrine say?

 

[Pogo]

This is the thing that always amazes us on the Right...the left wing has teamed up with radical islamic terrorism thinking that they can use them to bring down the west........and there won't be any blow back in that relationship....

Leftists and Islamists: Strange Bedfellows

It cannot be repeated enough that the Marxist-anarchist radical left Antifa and Islamic jihadists have joined forces to destroy Western civilization. Known as the Red-Green Axis, this unlikely alliance of leftists with Islamic groups is actually a means to an end by Islamists.

Inexplicably, left-wing forces do not comprehend that they are merely one of the tools by which Islamists wish to impose a global caliphate. In his searing documentary Killing Europe, producer Michael Hansen makes the following cogent points.

The Islamic jihadists have found willing partners in the left for a number of reasons.

• Particularly in Europe, the left's traditional voting bloc was the workers or proletariat. But as communism produced only mass misery and the deaths of millions, those who had invested 20-30 years in left-wing ideology soon found themselves without an identity once the proletariat saw the true nature of communism.
• Enter Muslim refugees, and the left now sees a new voting base. The fact that these migrants come from a culture completely at odds with the West does not faze the left, since leftists have never accepted historical facts and, even more telling, now tout a multicultural paradise, notwithstanding the irrevocable differences that an Islamic religious-based system contains. In essence, the left has found a new base to promote its own identity.
• That sharia law permits the stoning of gays, endorses gender apartheid, and advocates rape and murder of the infidel seems not to have registered in the leftist mind. Although the left abhors religion, leftists cannot fathom that their reliance on Islamist partners will not end well. This was borne out when the communists and Islamists joined to overturn the shah of Iran; the Islamic fundamentalists took the reins, eliminated the communists, and imposed draconian sharia law to maintain control.

As Ayn Rand wrote, "[r]eason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it." But as Kevin J. Johnston at Freedom Report explains, we need to be informed and realize that what is occurring is not to be denied even when political leaders reject the facts.

How, indeed, can a secularist or atheist even consider siding with a religiously mandated system that absolutely abhors secularism and atheism? How can leftists who are ostensibly concerned with women's rights and gay liberation partner with a system that mandates the murder of gays and the dehumanization and killing of women?

What both groups agree upon is a totalitarian society and censorship of ideas that would expose them. Political correctness hides their deeds. For example:

I am a liberal and I do not approve of you radical muslims.

You are a militant fabian socialist, Buttecea.....nothing more, nothing less.

It's amusing to watch the paranoid backwards muslims and fellowtravelers post here with their falsehoods and middle east superstitions....like chemtrails.......

The tards think the refugees who are fleeing the terrorists are the bad guys. These tards are no different than the fuckwads who turned away the Jews fleeing Hitler.

So they clearly believe the terrorists are the real Muslims.

You know, like these guys are the true Christians:

Those are democrats....Christians don't hate.....many democrats pretend to be Christians to get votes...but their hatred, jealousy and greed clearly show they are not Christians in any sense of the word....

Ah here's the post I was trying to click.

Those are not in any observable way "democrats" -- which means people who believe in democracy. Nor are they Democrats, which is the name of a political party. They're not up there to vote so we have no idea which of them, if any, are registered to vote at all. And we know they're not democrats because we know they are fascists.

What we also know is that they're Christians. We know that because it's a prerequisite for joining the Klan. That organization was founded with a burning cross, an unsheathed sword and a bible. It's mandatory.

Now the poster's point sailing blithely over your pointed head here is that we could take this group of Christians --- we know for a fact they're Christians --- and attribute every lynching, every whipping, every bombing or act of other destruction that they do and, via the exact same Composition Fallacy you brought in here like a load in your pants and proceeded to dump ---- to "Christianism".

And that would be the same fallacy you're already using. It's your own logic, looking back at you in the mirror, dumb shit. Expressed another way, "correlation is not causation". You probably don't have a clue in the world what that means but again --- that ignorance is on you.

As for your blanket generalization fallacy above, to wit "Christians don't hate", go ahead and explain Eric Rudolph. Or John Salvi. Or Tim McVeigh. Or Scott Roeder. Or Adolf Hitler.

Nothing's changed, Dumbass --- you trot fallacies in here, they WILL be shot down. Wid a quickness.

Eric Rudolph was a Zionist, John Salvi and Adolf Hitler belonged to the cult that is the catholic church and Timothy McVeigh was in black-ops and the patsy of the OKC bombing and saw nothing in his background that showed he was a Christian.
Scott Roeder? Don't support what he did but the fact that George "killer" Tiller was allowed to perform late term abortions is beyond disgusting but yet leftards supported his "practice".......

ALL irrelevant. Religion does not preclude politics; one can be (and many are) Christians while being Zionists, the IRA, Klanners (required), haters, masturbators, child daters, self-saters or bad check-writers.

The poster's claim was "Christians don't hate". I gave him (<< again that's HIM, not "you") myriad examples to refute.

And Catholics are fucking Christians Dumbass --- we were the first ones.

What does the doctrine say?

It says "boo". Next question please.

 

[Dale Smith]

I wonder then...in his fevered mind...who the real Muslims are?
The ones that go out and blow themselves up and murder innocent people...or those that don't?

The tards think the refugees who are fleeing the terrorists are the bad guys. These tards are no different than the fuckwads who turned away the Jews fleeing Hitler.

So they clearly believe the terrorists are the real Muslims.

You know, like these guys are the true Christians:

Those are democrats....Christians don't hate.....many democrats pretend to be Christians to get votes...but their hatred, jealousy and greed clearly show they are not Christians in any sense of the word....

Ah here's the post I was trying to click.

Those are not in any observable way "democrats" -- which means people who believe in democracy. Nor are they Democrats, which is the name of a political party. They're not up there to vote so we have no idea which of them, if any, are registered to vote at all. And we know they're not democrats because we know they are fascists.

What we also know is that they're Christians. We know that because it's a prerequisite for joining the Klan. That organization was founded with a burning cross, an unsheathed sword and a bible. It's mandatory.

Now the poster's point sailing blithely over your pointed head here is that we could take this group of Christians --- we know for a fact they're Christians --- and attribute every lynching, every whipping, every bombing or act of other destruction that they do and, via the exact same Composition Fallacy you brought in here like a load in your pants and proceeded to dump ---- to "Christianism".

And that would be the same fallacy you're already using. It's your own logic, looking back at you in the mirror, dumb shit. Expressed another way, "correlation is not causation". You probably don't have a clue in the world what that means but again --- that ignorance is on you.

As for your blanket generalization fallacy above, to wit "Christians don't hate", go ahead and explain Eric Rudolph. Or John Salvi. Or Tim McVeigh. Or Scott Roeder. Or Adolf Hitler.

Nothing's changed, Dumbass --- you trot fallacies in here, they WILL be shot down. Wid a quickness.

Eric Rudolph was a Zionist, John Salvi and Adolf Hitler belonged to the cult that is the catholic church and Timothy McVeigh was in black-ops and the patsy of the OKC bombing and saw nothing in his background that showed he was a Christian.
Scott Roeder? Don't support what he did but the fact that George "killer" Tiller was allowed to perform late term abortions is beyond disgusting but yet leftards supported his "practice".......

ALL irrelevant. Religion does not preclude politics; one can be (and many are) Christians while being Zionists, the IRA, Klanners (required), haters, masturbators, child daters, self-saters or bad check-writers.

The poster's claim was "Christians don't hate". I gave him (<< again that's HIM, not "you") myriad examples to refute.

And Catholics are fucking Christians Dumbass --- we were the first ones.

Catholicism is a cult that has been fighting Martin Luther's Reformation since the early 1500's. Look up the "Council of Trent" and how the Jesuits came to be. The Pope is the "vicar" of Jesus Christ and infallible? How is that Biblical? Purgatory? Paying for indulgences? Paganism mixed in with a few Biblical references for effect all used to milk their followers.....any questions? I would REALLY like to talk to you about the Jesuits.......