🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Why The NIST Report on WTC 7 is Unscientific and False

eots,

I see some of the "engineers" believe that thermite was proven to have been found at the WTC sites.

Do you believe Harrit's paper and what he found? Have you read it?
 
This is so obviously a set up.
We see this when the official news release of WTC7 falling was a little early.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s]BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE - YouTube[/ame]
 
(PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology.

Learn to read. I said structural and civil engineering or highrise architecture.
 
This is so obviously a set up.
We see this when the official news release of WTC7 falling was a little early.

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE - YouTube

Which is more likely:

A) There was some vast conspiracy by unknown numbers of peoples working for unknown organizations that managed to somehow take down WTC7 for reasons unknown and somehow managed to infiltrate the media (possibly going so far as to send someone to journalism school years before) possibly somehow getting two planes to hit two other buildings as a cover (or just conveniently having everything and everyone in place and using an entirely independent attack as an opportunity that couldn't be wasted) and wrote a phony press release that proclaimed WTC7 had fallen when anyone looking at the site could see it was still standing

OR

B) It was a chaotic situation and the media just got it wrong.

Thanks to the Internet, I'm no longer convinced the media just screwed up, something they have a history of doing, but really it was Ninja Demolition Teams working for [INSERT FAVORITE SHADOW ORGANIZATION HERE].
 
electrical engineers aren't qualified to discuss collapses of high rise buildings.

Their opinions don't really matter.

Should i get my dentist's opinion too?

thats total nonsense ..the man worked as an engineer in the world trade center and can attest to the ease in which the core columns could be accessed as well he is backed in his opinion by world class physicist.. Structural engineers ...hardly comparable to your dentist

when will your group of "architects and engineers" reach 1% of the total engineering community?

Pathetic.

In almost 12 years, you can't even get 1%.

Just goes to show you how much interest there is in your idiotic claims.

Here's an idea for you eots. Go ask richard humenn to design your next high rise apartment for you. I'm sure you'll trust that he's a qualified "structural" engineer.

:cuckoo:

oooooo.1% of engineers have endorse the nist collapse theory
 
But there was a giant building right next to it that fell down. You don't think at least some of WTC 1 or 2 might have possibly, could have, maybe hit 7 and done some serious damage? Some of that debris causing damage of it's own that led to fire lines being cut, a fire that rages out of control and weakened steel causing 7 to fall in on itself?

But that's somehow less likely than Ninja Demolition Crews.

WTC buildings 5 &6 were in front of WTC 7
World Trade Center Map | Wired New York
 
Building 6 was crushed by debris from Building 1.

It stands to reason that when Building 1 if falling apart and stuff is flying everywhere if some of it hits something (like say Buildings 6 & 7) there's going to be some serious damage, maybe even enough damage to cause a collapse, either directly or from fire mains being severed and fires raging out of control.

Or we can chalk it up to Ninja Demolition Crews.
 
building 6 was crushed by debris from building 1.

It stands to reason that when building 1 if falling apart and stuff is flying everywhere if some of it hits something (like say buildings 6 & 7) there's going to be some serious damage, maybe even enough damage to cause a collapse, either directly or from fire mains being severed and fires raging out of control.

Or we can chalk it up to ninja demolition crews.

nist determined that the building would of collapsed without damage from fire alone..perhaps you should actually read it one day
 
WTC 7's unusual construction allowed it to collapse after hourss of unfought fires.

there was nothing unusual about the construction of wtc 7 and the fires where scattered fires on a few floors

NIST says the construction was atypical of a highrise and you know this is true.

it had a large bottom entry area with no support columns.
 
WTC 7's unusual construction allowed it to collapse after hourss of unfought fires.

there was nothing unusual about the construction of wtc 7 and the fires where scattered fires on a few floors

13 floors were burning

there is no evidence 13 floors where burning..and office materials will only burn for approx 20 mins before the consume all combustibles in the area and spread tot he next 13 floors did all burn at once but NIST bogus computer model only works with sustained temperature throughout for 7 hrs..these where relatively small office fires.compared to known highrise fires that never collapsed [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVHuAexB83w]WTC 7 fire before collapse (FOIA NIST).mp4 - YouTube[/ame]
 
there is no evidence 13 floors where burning..and office materials will only burn for approx 20 mins before the consume all combustibles in the area and spread tot he next 13 floors did all burn at once but NIST bogus computer model only works with sustained temperature throughout for 7 hrs..these where relatively small office fires.compared to known highrise fires that never collapsed
the madrid office tower collapsed in the steel-only section.

Over the course of the day fires burned out of control on several floors of 7 World Trade Center, the flames visible on the east side of the building.[34][35] During the afternoon, fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30.[30] In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon.[36] At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse.[37] During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.

7 World Trade Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

the evidence defeats you
 

Forum List

Back
Top