pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 70,601
- 27,285
- 2,210
You have to tell me.
(sawry, I don't have your body of work on speed click.)
Read the thread. It's right before you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have to tell me.
(sawry, I don't have your body of work on speed click.)
It hasn't been missused. You just don't understand the legal theory.
I do
One would wonder why you would leave Jamaica and come to the racist hellhole of America?How intelligent is it to dismiss socio-economic disparities for disparate social outcomes especially with America's history and culture of racism and black disenfranchisement?
Was that too complicated for you or do I need more "whitey" commentary to pare it down to your intellectual level?
It didn't have to be written for children of immigrants born here, legal or illegal, because they already had birthright citizenship...decided at the time of our founder's lives.No, your explanations make no sense. it would not be unconstitutional to make such a law. If somebody wants to fight it on those grounds, I'd love the SC to rule on it once and for all. Go to the link I provided about the 14th Amendment that I posted. It was not written for immigrants.
Sometimes it also looks like this:True…thanks for taking care of all of our disgusting rejects.
View attachment 781811
Well I suppose if one were someone like you with your inate intelligence being what it is they would wonder about something like that.One would wonder why you would leave Jamaica and come to the racist hellhole of America?
What is the legal foundation of the idea? Why should being born here grant someone citizenship? I assume the historical motivation was to encourage immigration - when the nation was young with a lot of frontier to tame. But that's not the case now, and don't really see any justification for continuing the policy.
Ok, is that a real question, or are you trying to make a point? If so, kindly do it.What country's laws have jurisdiction in the US?
Do you understand the meaning of jurisdiction in law?
It didn't have to be written for children of immigrants born here, legal or illegal, because they already had birthright citizenship...decided at the time of our founder's lives.
Any one born here under our jurisdiction were citizens at birth, regardless of parent's status...unless a diplomat child born here.
Which part of 50% is it that YOU don't understand? - there is absolutely no failure-rate of 50% amongst contraceptives - go and fool someone else.What part of “Half of them were using birth control when they got pregnant?” Did you not read?
Right, let's be really clear about what lefty/libs&greens have been doing to society since 45 years.And let’s be really clear hear about the ...
Which part of 50% is it that YOU don't understand? - there is absolutely no failure-rate of 50% amongst contraceptives - go and fool someone else.
male condoms are about 98% effective at preventing pregnancy. This means that in one year, 2 out of every 100 women whose partners always use condoms correctly will get pregnant.Condoms: Effectiveness, Types, and Proper Use
Condoms are a popular form of male birth control that uses the barrier method of contraception. Learn more about the effectiveness, types, and proper use of condoms.www.webmd.com
Right, let's be really clear about what lefty/libs&greens have been doing to society since 45 years.
Reject authority in general, reject morals and cultural standards that don't fit into their agenda and push responsibility for own actions always onto others.
Propagate that the legal age for sex - needs to be dropped down to 14 and consuming pot and alcohol in public for minors is great as well, After-all times are changing - right?
Due to a total lack in moral standards and utter rejection towards taking personal responsibility - we end up with millions of brainless idiots humping and bumping around - just wanting fun, and too stupid and ignorant to take precautions and end up with millions seeking refuge in abortion.
The magic formula that needs to be hammered into ALL lefties/libs&greens is: "take responsibility for your own actions" and stop laying blame onto those who do. Or even better pay up yourself for your own "preferred culture style" and reject government aid and help from those who actually work for a living and a state who's authority you continuously try to dismantle, if it doesn't financially subsidize your pathetic, and parasitic lifestyle.
We had worse disparities and worse racism from 1865 until the early sixties without them trying to commit genocide on themselves. It was only after the Democrats encouraged tribalism as a way to win elections, and Roe v Wade started the mass killing of black babies that we started to go in the direction that we are going.How intelligent is it to dismiss socio-economic disparities for disparate social outcomes especially with America's history and culture of racism and black disenfranchisement?
You pick the words, I know what you mean. You hate whitey you feel entitled to hate whitey.Was that too complicated for you or do I need more "whitey" commentary to pare it down to your intellectual level?
It's not a policy, it's a constitutional protection. That's like asking why we bother protecting free speech today. The legal foundation is that it's a stupid idea to allow politicians to decide who gets to be a citizen. That's sort of the antithesis of inalienable, natural rights. Would you be comfortable with the Democrats getting to decide who was and wasn't a citizen of they had enough federal power?What is the legal foundation of the idea? Why should being born here grant someone citizenship? I assume the historical motivation was to encourage immigration - when the nation was young with a lot of frontier to tame. But that's not the case now, and don't really see any justification for continuing the policy.
Whose laws are applicable in the US?
Tell me.
What the fuck are you babbling about? Employers have to check work status. That is the law. So, you would def know if you are hiring illegals.If you don't know you're breaking any laws, HTF can they charge you with anything you moron? In our country you can't just use he broke the law, you have to prove he broke the law. If I tell police you robbed a bank, they don't arrest you. They have to come up with evidence you robbed the bank.
If somebody is hired using false documentation, HTF is the employer supposed to know it's fake? Then you have leftist judges that have allowed lawsuits to go through by illegals who were not hired due to their illegal status.
The real solution to getting rid of illegals is getting rid of leftists first.