Will Comey Cost Hillary The Presidency?

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[ChrisL]

So wait, is this the fault of the Russians or is it George Bush's fault?

 

[Lakhota]

Hillary/Comey/Trump: The irony is overwhelming.

 

[Divine Wind]

...In other words, they are saying that they are firing Comey, in essence, for unfairness to Hillary Clinton.

Correct. Democrats and other LWers have been screaming for Comey's head on a platter ever since he reopened the investigation on Hillary. Now that Trump actually did what they wanted, the LWers are flip-flopping faster than John Kerry.

 

[Zoom-boing]

So, Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary? OMG, the shit is getting deep...

You dumbshit. He fired Comey for being a pussbag and not prosecuting clinton and he made up his mind on that in July, 2106.

 

[Lakhota]

When did we first learn that Comey was investigating Trump?

March 20, 2017 - two full months after Trump became president. Therefore, after hearing this new information, why would Hillary supporters who were previously calling for Comey's head want to see him fired in the middle of his Trump-Russia investigation?

TIMING is everything! I don't recall hearing any Democrats call for Comey to be fired after first learning from Comey on March 20, 2017 that Trump was also under FBI investigation since July 2016. Also, I challenge anyone to find any quotes where I called for Comey's firing after March 20, 2017.

 

[Wyatt earp]

When did we first learn that Comey was investigating Trump?

March 20, 2017 - two full months after Trump became president. Therefore, after hearing this new information, why would Hillary supporters who were previously calling for Comey's head want to see him fired in the middle of his Trump-Russia investigation?

TIMING is everything! I don't recall hearing any Democrats call for Comey to be fired after first learning from Comey on March 20, 2017 that Trump was also under FBI investigation since July 2016. Also, I challenge anyone to find any quotes where I called for Comey's firing after March 20, 2017.

Don't you ever get tired of lying?




Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia

• 
  President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia after a meeting in October about Ukraine and Syria.
  KLAUS-DIETMAR GABBERT / EUROPEAN PRESSPHOTO AGENCY
  By ERIC LICHTBLAU and STEVEN LEE MYERS
  OCTOBER 31, 2016

WASHINGTON — For much of the summer, the F.B.I. pursued a widening investigation into a Russian role in the American presidential campaign. Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead — which they ultimately came to doubt — about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.

 

[Wyatt earp]

When did we first learn that Comey was investigating Trump?

March 20, 2017 - two full months after Trump became president. Therefore, after hearing this new information, why would Hillary supporters who were previously calling for Comey's head want to see him fired in the middle of his Trump-Russia investigation?

TIMING is everything! I don't recall hearing any Democrats call for Comey to be fired after first learning from Comey on March 20, 2017 that Trump was also under FBI investigation since July 2016. Also, I challenge anyone to find any quotes where I called for Comey's firing after March 20, 2017.

 

[TheDude]

View attachment 126389

When did we first learn that Comey was investigating Trump?

March 20, 2017 - two full months after Trump became president. Therefore, after hearing this new information, why would Hillary supporters who were previously calling for Comey's head want to see him fired in the middle of his Trump-Russia investigation?

TIMING is everything! I don't recall hearing any Democrats call for Comey to be fired after first learning from Comey on March 20, 2017 that Trump was also under FBI investigation since July 2016. Also, I challenge anyone to find any quotes where I called for Comey's firing after March 20, 2017.

View attachment 126389

Ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

 

[Zoom-boing]

 

[Zoom-boing]

Again, why Trump fired Comey

Report: Comey Plotted To Avoid Charges Against Hillary BEFORE The FBI Interviewed Her

 

[FA_Q2]

That really sums up the entire problem with all the political BS surrounding this event.

 

[Divine Wind]

That really sums up the entire problem with all the political BS surrounding this event.

Well, at least one of the problems. LW hypocrisy isn't new nor surprising. We just 8 years of it.

 

[Lakhota]

Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

The Washington Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress in early May that he felt “mildly nauseous” at the idea that he may have influenced the outcome of the U.S. election by speaking publicly about Hillary Clinton’s “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server as secretary of state.

The Washington Post on Wednesday shed more light on why he chose to make that announcement, which broke FBI protocol not to comment on closed cases where no charges are brought. Before Comey’s July announcement, the FBI obtained a Russian intelligence document of dubious origin and veracity that claimed to cite communications between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Clinton’s campaign, in which Lynch assured a campaign staffer that the Justice Department would not closely investigate the email server.

The document did not include the email in question and merely described its contents. The Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake. FBI officials, who said the source who provided the document had offered up un-corroborated information in the past, called the document “junk” and “unreliable and based on multiple layers of hearsay.”

The agency tried to verify the document by searching for the compromising email in question and could not find it, according to the report. Then when the FBI interviewed Lynch to determine the validity of the document’s claims, she said she had never communicated with the Clinton staffer in question.

Still, the Post reported that the document had a major impact on Comey, who believed he needed to speak publicly about the Clinton email server case in order to get out ahead of accusations of coziness and special favors. Without giving Lynch a heads up, and in the heat of the general election, he publicly criticized Clinton’s handling of classified material over email, a decision some have argued helped Donald Trump clinch the presidency.

More: Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

This is unconscionable! This clearly cost Hillary the election! Comey acted on a fake Russian document.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

What ?

 

[hadit]

Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

The Washington Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress in early May that he felt “mildly nauseous” at the idea that he may have influenced the outcome of the U.S. election by speaking publicly about Hillary Clinton’s “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server as secretary of state.

The Washington Post on Wednesday shed more light on why he chose to make that announcement, which broke FBI protocol not to comment on closed cases where no charges are brought. Before Comey’s July announcement, the FBI obtained a Russian intelligence document of dubious origin and veracity that claimed to cite communications between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Clinton’s campaign, in which Lynch assured a campaign staffer that the Justice Department would not closely investigate the email server.

The document did not include the email in question and merely described its contents. The Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake. FBI officials, who said the source who provided the document had offered up un-corroborated information in the past, called the document “junk” and “unreliable and based on multiple layers of hearsay.”

The agency tried to verify the document by searching for the compromising email in question and could not find it, according to the report. Then when the FBI interviewed Lynch to determine the validity of the document’s claims, she said she had never communicated with the Clinton staffer in question.

Still, the Post reported that the document had a major impact on Comey, who believed he needed to speak publicly about the Clinton email server case in order to get out ahead of accusations of coziness and special favors. Without giving Lynch a heads up, and in the heat of the general election, he publicly criticized Clinton’s handling of classified material over email, a decision some have argued helped Donald Trump clinch the presidency.

More: Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

This is unconscionable! This clearly cost Hillary the election! Comey acted on a fake Russian document.

So, IOW, Trump did the right thing by firing him.

 

[Lakhota]

Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

The Washington Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress in early May that he felt “mildly nauseous” at the idea that he may have influenced the outcome of the U.S. election by speaking publicly about Hillary Clinton’s “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server as secretary of state.

The Washington Post on Wednesday shed more light on why he chose to make that announcement, which broke FBI protocol not to comment on closed cases where no charges are brought. Before Comey’s July announcement, the FBI obtained a Russian intelligence document of dubious origin and veracity that claimed to cite communications between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Clinton’s campaign, in which Lynch assured a campaign staffer that the Justice Department would not closely investigate the email server.

The document did not include the email in question and merely described its contents. The Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake. FBI officials, who said the source who provided the document had offered up un-corroborated information in the past, called the document “junk” and “unreliable and based on multiple layers of hearsay.”

The agency tried to verify the document by searching for the compromising email in question and could not find it, according to the report. Then when the FBI interviewed Lynch to determine the validity of the document’s claims, she said she had never communicated with the Clinton staffer in question.

Still, the Post reported that the document had a major impact on Comey, who believed he needed to speak publicly about the Clinton email server case in order to get out ahead of accusations of coziness and special favors. Without giving Lynch a heads up, and in the heat of the general election, he publicly criticized Clinton’s handling of classified material over email, a decision some have argued helped Donald Trump clinch the presidency.

More: Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

This is unconscionable! This clearly cost Hillary the election! Comey acted on a fake Russian document.

So, IOW, Trump did the right thing by firing him.

Duh, no, not after Comey announced on March 20, 2017 that Trump was under FBI criminal investigation - since July 2016.

 

[hadit]

Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

The Washington Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress in early May that he felt “mildly nauseous” at the idea that he may have influenced the outcome of the U.S. election by speaking publicly about Hillary Clinton’s “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server as secretary of state.

The Washington Post on Wednesday shed more light on why he chose to make that announcement, which broke FBI protocol not to comment on closed cases where no charges are brought. Before Comey’s July announcement, the FBI obtained a Russian intelligence document of dubious origin and veracity that claimed to cite communications between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Clinton’s campaign, in which Lynch assured a campaign staffer that the Justice Department would not closely investigate the email server.

The document did not include the email in question and merely described its contents. The Post reported that many people within the U.S. intelligence community believed the document either contained bad intelligence or was fake. FBI officials, who said the source who provided the document had offered up un-corroborated information in the past, called the document “junk” and “unreliable and based on multiple layers of hearsay.”

The agency tried to verify the document by searching for the compromising email in question and could not find it, according to the report. Then when the FBI interviewed Lynch to determine the validity of the document’s claims, she said she had never communicated with the Clinton staffer in question.

Still, the Post reported that the document had a major impact on Comey, who believed he needed to speak publicly about the Clinton email server case in order to get out ahead of accusations of coziness and special favors. Without giving Lynch a heads up, and in the heat of the general election, he publicly criticized Clinton’s handling of classified material over email, a decision some have argued helped Donald Trump clinch the presidency.

More: Dubious Russian Intel Doc Spurred Comey To Speak On Clinton Emails Probe

This is unconscionable! This clearly cost Hillary the election! Comey acted on a fake Russian document.

So, IOW, Trump did the right thing by firing him.

Duh, no, not after Comey announced on March 20, 2017 that Trump was under FBI criminal investigation - since July 2016.

No one believes that firing the head of the FBI stops an investigation, so that's bogus.

 

[easyt65]

Snowflakes claiming Comey cost Hillary the election is just as funny as snowflakes claiming Hillary should be President because she won the 'popularity contest' vote.

HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO REMAIN IN THE RACE BECAUSE OF BEING UNDER MULTIPLE FBI INVESTIGATIONS FOR HER CRIMES THAT INCLUDED THE CHARGE OF 'EXPIONAGE' - AND WE NOW KNOW, THANKS TO COMEY'S TESTIMONY, THAT HILLARY WAS / IS GUILTY OF BREAKING NUMEROUS LAWS AND JEOPARDIZING OUR NATIONAL SECURITY.

ALTHOUGH THEY WILL NEVER PUBLICLY ADMIT TO IT, THEY - SNOWFLAKES - AND THE DNC'S PROPAGANDA-PUSHING, FAKE NEWS, ALL-IN MEDIA WOULD NEVER HAVE ALLOWED ANY REPUBLICAN IN THE SAME SITUATION TO REMAIN IN THE ELECTION.

 

[Lakhota]

When will Comey publicly apologize for costing Hillary the election?