Will Republicans hand Trump another loss

[harmonica]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

.....that wouldn't be a loss for Mr Trump---DUH...it would be a loss for all Americans ..and the main culprits are the America hating Dems

 

[harmonica]

It's always been all about Trump. He doesn't care about anyone but Trump.

Can you imagine being married to this dude and just listening to him rant and rave constantly? Melania is a hero.

better than married to some loser like you

 

[Sunsettommy]

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

Your citation says the House hasn't passed a new bill yet ... and that the Senate hasn't even taken it up ... so the answer to S'Tommy's question is "no" ...

Really? What do you think the article was saying Democrats were trying to do?

Is this better?

Republicans block Democratic effort to increase direct checks to $2,000

Republicans blocked a request by Democrats to pass the bill by unanimous consent.

www.cbsnews.com

House Republicans on Thursday blocked a bill by Democrats to provide direct checks of $2,000 to individuals on Thursday, after President Trump called on Congress to amend a newly passed coronavirus relief bill to increase direct payments to $2,000, with $4,000 for a couple. House Republicans blocked the proposal, which Democrats tried to pass by unanimous consent, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi said there will be a full House vote on the measure next week.

From your FIRST link:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

=====

from your second link:

"Democratic Congressman Richard Neal, the House Ways and Means Committee chair, introduced the Caring for Americans with Supplemental Help (CASH) Act on Thursday, increasing the direct payments to $2,000. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer attempted to bring the bill to the floor by unanimous consent, but it was blocked due to opposition from Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. Only one Republican, Congressman Rob Whittman, needed to be present on the House floor to block the bill."

===

Now you are downright dishonest since it was the DEMOCRATS who screwed up since they used the Pro Forma session process, which mandated UNANIMOUS consent, thus only one republican vote is needed shut it down.

I think the Democrats WANTED it to fail on purpose.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

It isn't about Trump, it's about America's debt and irresponsible spending by BOTH parties.

 

[pknopp]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

It isn't about Trump, it's about America's debt and irresponsible spending by BOTH parties.

If anyone cared about that it would have been addressed long ago.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

It isn't about Trump, it's about America's debt and irresponsible spending by BOTH parties.

If anyone cared about that it would have been addressed long ago.

CLEARLY the public cares about it as well as 2 democrats and 56 Republicans.

 

[pknopp]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

It isn't about Trump, it's about America's debt and irresponsible spending by BOTH parties.

If anyone cared about that it would have been addressed long ago.

CLEARLY the public cares about it as well as 2 democrats and 56 Republicans.

No they do not or they would have quit voting those who have created the 28 trillion debt in over and over again.

 

[HappyJoy]

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

Your citation says the House hasn't passed a new bill yet ... and that the Senate hasn't even taken it up ... so the answer to S'Tommy's question is "no" ...

Really? What do you think the article was saying Democrats were trying to do?

Is this better?

Republicans block Democratic effort to increase direct checks to $2,000

Republicans blocked a request by Democrats to pass the bill by unanimous consent.

www.cbsnews.com

House Republicans on Thursday blocked a bill by Democrats to provide direct checks of $2,000 to individuals on Thursday, after President Trump called on Congress to amend a newly passed coronavirus relief bill to increase direct payments to $2,000, with $4,000 for a couple. House Republicans blocked the proposal, which Democrats tried to pass by unanimous consent, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi said there will be a full House vote on the measure next week.

From your FIRST link:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

=====

from your second link:

"Democratic Congressman Richard Neal, the House Ways and Means Committee chair, introduced the Caring for Americans with Supplemental Help (CASH) Act on Thursday, increasing the direct payments to $2,000. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer attempted to bring the bill to the floor by unanimous consent, but it was blocked due to opposition from Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. Only one Republican, Congressman Rob Whittman, needed to be present on the House floor to block the bill."

===

Now you are downright dishonest since it was the DEMOCRATS who screwed up since they used the Pro Forma session process, which mandated UNANIMOUS consent, thus only one republican vote is needed shut it down.

I think the Democrats WANTED it to fail on purpose.

They used Unanimous Consent because they didn't have time for the full process and wanted to expedite the $2000 payments as quickly as possible. Don't blame Democrats because the GOP shot it down and now we have to wait until after Christmas and the Democrats will resubmit.

I didn't lie about anything.

 

[White 6]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

At this point it is almost up to trump. He never vetoed the bill passed by congress and the 116th congress ends January 3rd and without veto there is nothing to override. 10 days from December 21, the day it passed takes it up to December 31. 10 days if congress not in session makes a pocket veto and any bill if still not settled before 116th congress ends, starts all over in the House of Representatives. If I have this wrong or not properly understood, please let me know.

I's not almost up to Trump. It's entirely in his court. Congress is in recess and it will not meet again till Jan 6th. Of course there could be an emergency session called but that would not happen unless the leadership knew that they had legislation that was likely to pass.

They can call emergency session and override the veto already on NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act, already vetoed that funds military), but they would just about have to stay there until after the 31st if they want Omnibus and Relief to go into effect, as without a veto, there is nothing to override, and they have to be in session for it to automatically pass into law without president's signature and that is just with the existing $600. I would not trust him that what he really wants is $2000 to everybody and if they passed that, he can easily let it sit without signing until after the 116th congress ends on Jan 3rd and cause maximum confusion and maximum pain by making the 117th congress start all over, and guaranteeing government shut down on his way out the door until the Next president comes into office as the 116th congress does not have 10 days left.

 

[White 6]

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

Your citation says the House hasn't passed a new bill yet ... and that the Senate hasn't even taken it up ... so the answer to S'Tommy's question is "no" ...

Really? What do you think the article was saying Democrats were trying to do?

Is this better?

Republicans block Democratic effort to increase direct checks to $2,000

Republicans blocked a request by Democrats to pass the bill by unanimous consent.

www.cbsnews.com

House Republicans on Thursday blocked a bill by Democrats to provide direct checks of $2,000 to individuals on Thursday, after President Trump called on Congress to amend a newly passed coronavirus relief bill to increase direct payments to $2,000, with $4,000 for a couple. House Republicans blocked the proposal, which Democrats tried to pass by unanimous consent, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi said there will be a full House vote on the measure next week.

From your FIRST link:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

=====

from your second link:

"Democratic Congressman Richard Neal, the House Ways and Means Committee chair, introduced the Caring for Americans with Supplemental Help (CASH) Act on Thursday, increasing the direct payments to $2,000. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer attempted to bring the bill to the floor by unanimous consent, but it was blocked due to opposition from Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. Only one Republican, Congressman Rob Whittman, needed to be present on the House floor to block the bill."

===

Now you are downright dishonest since it was the DEMOCRATS who screwed up since they used the Pro Forma session process, which mandated UNANIMOUS consent, thus only one republican vote is needed shut it down.

I think the Democrats WANTED it to fail on purpose.

They used Unanimous Consent because they didn't have time for the full process and wanted to expedite the $2000 payments as quickly as possible. Don't blame Democrats because the GOP shot it down and now we have to wait until after Christmas and the Democrats will resubmit.

I didn't lie about anything.

They had best hope trump vetoes, so they can override with the original $600. If the 116th Congress passes another bill, he can let it sit for 10 days, the 116th congress will end and then they will have to start all over in the House with the omnibus and the relief and probably wait for presidential until Biden comes into office on the 20th.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

You didn't read very well, here is what you missed, that shows the Democrats could have made the changes using their majority, didn't bother to do it:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

Ooops!

It was the liberals who screwed up.

Meanwhile the lazy ass Congress shows their contempt of Americans by not doing their job in the first place:

The Last Refuge

Rage Against The Machine – It’s Simple Really, President Trump Asks Legislative Branch to Use COVID Relief to Help Americans No-One Else

Posted on December 26, 2020 by Sundance

Excerpt:

As noted yesterday, a simple COVID relief bill for American workers is really not a big problem… except it is… because the DC system is not structured around simply helping Americans first. The legislative machinery is owned by K-Street and multinationals who pay for the outcomes they alone create.
A people’s president, Donald Trump, cuts through the chaff and countermeasures:

(snip)


President Trump wants congress to re-write the $900 billion COVID bill to provide $2,000 per person instead of $600 per person. In essence Trump is asking for a stand alone COVID relief bill for $2k/person, then drop the $600/person payment out of the pork-laden COVID relief bill and start that economic relief bill over.

This is not a hard issue to resolve. The only reason UniParty congress is fighting Trump is because the lobbyist and foreign government bribes are part of the $900 billion and will not pass the scrutiny of public opinion if standing alone. Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never return to that moment in time when you did not see them.

Heavy sigh…

LINK

except the spending bill if not passed is the government SHUT DOWN, no money to get vaccines to states, no money to states for administering the vaccines, no further state testing for covid to track the new strain..... etc etc etc.... let alone gvt shut downs costing us billions to shut down and to reopen..... THAT'S a WASTE of money....

And these programs he says should be cut, were actually requests in the whitehouse budget, to be passed in the whitehouse part of negotiations.

Meadows and Minuchin HAD TO HAVE UPDATED Trump on these measures a month ago.

WHERE WAS HE THEN?

It's always been all about Trump. He doesn't care about anyone but Trump.

Nope, libs hate america to the core. Its always about how much they hate america.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

It isn't about Trump, it's about America's debt and irresponsible spending by BOTH parties.

Is Trump advocating irresponsible spending

 

[ElmerMudd]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

You didn't read very well, here is what you missed, that shows the Democrats could have made the changes using their majority, didn't bother to do it:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

Ooops!

It was the liberals who screwed up.

Meanwhile the lazy ass Congress shows their contempt of Americans by not doing their job in the first place:

The Last Refuge

Rage Against The Machine – It’s Simple Really, President Trump Asks Legislative Branch to Use COVID Relief to Help Americans No-One Else

Posted on December 26, 2020 by Sundance

Excerpt:

As noted yesterday, a simple COVID relief bill for American workers is really not a big problem… except it is… because the DC system is not structured around simply helping Americans first. The legislative machinery is owned by K-Street and multinationals who pay for the outcomes they alone create.
A people’s president, Donald Trump, cuts through the chaff and countermeasures:

(snip)


President Trump wants congress to re-write the $900 billion COVID bill to provide $2,000 per person instead of $600 per person. In essence Trump is asking for a stand alone COVID relief bill for $2k/person, then drop the $600/person payment out of the pork-laden COVID relief bill and start that economic relief bill over.

This is not a hard issue to resolve. The only reason UniParty congress is fighting Trump is because the lobbyist and foreign government bribes are part of the $900 billion and will not pass the scrutiny of public opinion if standing alone. Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never return to that moment in time when you did not see them.

Heavy sigh…

LINK

except the spending bill if not passed is the government SHUT DOWN, no money to get vaccines to states, no money to states for administering the vaccines, no further state testing for covid to track the new strain..... etc etc etc.... let alone gvt shut downs costing us billions to shut down and to reopen..... THAT'S a WASTE of money....

And these programs he says should be cut, were actually requests in the whitehouse budget, to be passed in the whitehouse part of negotiations.

Meadows and Minuchin HAD TO HAVE UPDATED Trump on these measures a month ago.

WHERE WAS HE THEN?

It's always been all about Trump. He doesn't care about anyone but Trump.

Nope, libs hate america to the core. Its always about how much they hate america.

Trump and Deocrats hate America so they are advocating $2000 stimulus checks?

 

[Fiero425]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

What loss; the scumbags in Congress want to hand out billions in foreign aid when US citizens need the money.

Talk to The State Department! It's their request and guess who runs it? Republicans love to throw out blame, accusations, & alternative facts, but when wrong, I never hear an apology!

 

[White 6]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

It isn't about Trump, it's about America's debt and irresponsible spending by BOTH parties.

Is Trump advocating irresponsible spending

I think so, but so are the rest of the republicans and the democrats alike.

 

[Fiero425]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

It isn't about Trump, it's about America's debt and irresponsible spending by BOTH parties.

Is Trump advocating irresponsible spending

That's what Republicans do; advocate being the "responsible party," cutting taxes, talking about infrastrastructure spending that never happens, and blaming Democrats for all of it! History will show budget deficits and The Nat'l Debt has always gotten out of control when Republicans are in charge! They're so FOS I can't stand it!

 

[Indeependent]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

What loss; the scumbags in Congress want to hand out billions in foreign aid when US citizens need the money.

Talk to The State Department! It's their request and guess who runs it? Republicans love to throw out blame, accusations, & alternative facts, but when wrong, I never hear an apology!

Which is why I hate both parties.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

You didn't read very well, here is what you missed, that shows the Democrats could have made the changes using their majority, didn't bother to do it:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

Ooops!

It was the liberals who screwed up.

Meanwhile the lazy ass Congress shows their contempt of Americans by not doing their job in the first place:

The Last Refuge

Rage Against The Machine – It’s Simple Really, President Trump Asks Legislative Branch to Use COVID Relief to Help Americans No-One Else

Posted on December 26, 2020 by Sundance

Excerpt:

As noted yesterday, a simple COVID relief bill for American workers is really not a big problem… except it is… because the DC system is not structured around simply helping Americans first. The legislative machinery is owned by K-Street and multinationals who pay for the outcomes they alone create.
A people’s president, Donald Trump, cuts through the chaff and countermeasures:

(snip)


President Trump wants congress to re-write the $900 billion COVID bill to provide $2,000 per person instead of $600 per person. In essence Trump is asking for a stand alone COVID relief bill for $2k/person, then drop the $600/person payment out of the pork-laden COVID relief bill and start that economic relief bill over.

This is not a hard issue to resolve. The only reason UniParty congress is fighting Trump is because the lobbyist and foreign government bribes are part of the $900 billion and will not pass the scrutiny of public opinion if standing alone. Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never return to that moment in time when you did not see them.

Heavy sigh…

LINK

Stop your slithering and conniving. yes, a measure to send $2000 checks was drafted by democrats. yes, republicans blocked it. These are facts. Stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

You didn't read very well, here is what you missed, that shows the Democrats could have made the changes using their majority, didn't bother to do it:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

Ooops!

It was the liberals who screwed up.

Meanwhile the lazy ass Congress shows their contempt of Americans by not doing their job in the first place:

The Last Refuge

Rage Against The Machine – It’s Simple Really, President Trump Asks Legislative Branch to Use COVID Relief to Help Americans No-One Else

Posted on December 26, 2020 by Sundance

Excerpt:

As noted yesterday, a simple COVID relief bill for American workers is really not a big problem… except it is… because the DC system is not structured around simply helping Americans first. The legislative machinery is owned by K-Street and multinationals who pay for the outcomes they alone create.
A people’s president, Donald Trump, cuts through the chaff and countermeasures:

(snip)


President Trump wants congress to re-write the $900 billion COVID bill to provide $2,000 per person instead of $600 per person. In essence Trump is asking for a stand alone COVID relief bill for $2k/person, then drop the $600/person payment out of the pork-laden COVID relief bill and start that economic relief bill over.

This is not a hard issue to resolve. The only reason UniParty congress is fighting Trump is because the lobbyist and foreign government bribes are part of the $900 billion and will not pass the scrutiny of public opinion if standing alone. Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never return to that moment in time when you did not see them.

Heavy sigh…

LINK

Stop your slithering and conniving. yes, a measure to send $2000 checks was drafted by democrats. yes, republicans blocked it. These are facts. Stop embarrassing yourself.

Trump advocated the $2000 stimulus. Whatever Trump goes after he loses. Trump is the biggest loser, ever

 

[Indeependent]

Will Republicans hand Trump another loss?
Trump is demanding $2000 stimulus checks.
Democrats are on board.
Will Republicans deny the $2000 stimulus checks giving Trump another loss?

Have Congress made a new bill with the $2,000 in it yet?

Yes.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/24/house-votes-on-2000-stimulus-checks-after-trump-supports-them.html

You didn't read very well, here is what you missed, that shows the Democrats could have made the changes using their majority, didn't bother to do it:

"The House tried to pass the $2,000 payments during a pro forma session on Christmas Eve day, a brief meeting of the chamber where typically only a few members attend. Democrats aimed to approve the measure by unanimous consent, which means any one lawmaker can block it.

Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., offered the proposal from the House floor, but was blocked because the measure was not approved by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.

Subsequently, Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., attempted to get lawmakers to reconsider aspects of the spending bill related to foreign aid. That move was blocked by Democrats."

Ooops!

It was the liberals who screwed up.

Meanwhile the lazy ass Congress shows their contempt of Americans by not doing their job in the first place:

The Last Refuge

Rage Against The Machine – It’s Simple Really, President Trump Asks Legislative Branch to Use COVID Relief to Help Americans No-One Else

Posted on December 26, 2020 by Sundance

Excerpt:

As noted yesterday, a simple COVID relief bill for American workers is really not a big problem… except it is… because the DC system is not structured around simply helping Americans first. The legislative machinery is owned by K-Street and multinationals who pay for the outcomes they alone create.
A people’s president, Donald Trump, cuts through the chaff and countermeasures:

(snip)


President Trump wants congress to re-write the $900 billion COVID bill to provide $2,000 per person instead of $600 per person. In essence Trump is asking for a stand alone COVID relief bill for $2k/person, then drop the $600/person payment out of the pork-laden COVID relief bill and start that economic relief bill over.

This is not a hard issue to resolve. The only reason UniParty congress is fighting Trump is because the lobbyist and foreign government bribes are part of the $900 billion and will not pass the scrutiny of public opinion if standing alone. Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never return to that moment in time when you did not see them.

Heavy sigh…

LINK

Stop your slithering and conniving. yes, a measure to send $2000 checks was drafted by democrats. yes, republicans blocked it. These are facts. Stop embarrassing yourself.

Trump advocated the $2000 stimulus. Whatever Trump goes after he loses. Trump is the biggest loser, ever

Trump To Use Impoundment Control Act To Gut ‘Wasteful Spending,’ Try To Boost Stimulus Checks | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Trump will try to cut the pork.