Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More conspiracy bullcrap... Y'all been dealing in conspirital bullcrap so much in the past 3 years, that a mouse could fart 100 miles away from Trump, and you would say Trump farted instead of the mouse, although you would be looking right at the mouse when he passed the gas, a light goes off as to how you can blame it on Trump immediately huh ?? It's really sad.So, Trump* started a war to detract from his impeachment. Anyone surprised?
I look at it as Trump trying to wrestle with the foriegn policy mess or disaster that Obama left him when the disaster Obama passed the torch over to Trump.
REPORT: SHOCKED AIDES WEREN’T SOLD ON ‘INTEL’
Gee, what a surprise. Trump* is wagging the war dog to divert attention from impeachment. I suspect it will bite him hard when the truth comes out.
REPORT: SHOCKED AIDES WEREN’T SOLD ON ‘INTEL’
Gee, what a surprise. Trump* is wagging the war dog to divert attention from impeachment. I suspect it will bite him hard when the truth comes out.
They didn't kill him ?
Wait...Huffpost....Fake News.
[/QUOTE]He's a loser.
He lost in 2016.
He lost the impeachment gamble (charade).
Now, he's going to lose big in 2020.
And he'll lose another seat on the SCOTUS.
There's little left for him to lose....so why not throw this kind of crap.
Oh wait.....it's what he does all the time.....even when he's not losing (which is rare).
If Democrats get nothing from playing this anti American game, what does that make them? Stupid?I seem to remember you were rather upset about that... I guess it is different when the left does it.It simply doesn't say. So she can hold on to them as long as she likes. Kind of like there's no time frame in the Constitution for when the Senate has to hold confirmation hearings on Supreme Court nominations selected by the president.It also doesnt give her permission to hold them either. What it does say is, the house impeaches, the senate does the trial. She is not allowing the senate to do the trial, thus, obstruction.Well, the credible source is the constitution. The laws she is violating are obstruction of congress, by preventing the senate from carrying out their duty, and by violating trumps due process rights.Funny. What law is Speaker Pelosi violating? What part of the Constitution is she violating? Please be specific and quote credible sources.
Funny. The Constitution does not state a timeline for when she must deliver them to the Senate - or if ever.
FAR more important here though, the republicans managed to ensure they captured the nomination for SCOTUS with their games. What do the democrats get with this little game?
They get to stop the impeachment process? That is what the republicans want, not the democrats. The democrats get nothing from playing this game.
Of course I was upset. Republicans disenfranchised me by playing loose with the Constitution. But no turn in Washington ever goes undone. Now Democrats are playing the game that Republicans did.I seem to remember you were rather upset about that... I guess it is different when the left does it.It simply doesn't say. So she can hold on to them as long as she likes. Kind of like there's no time frame in the Constitution for when the Senate has to hold confirmation hearings on Supreme Court nominations selected by the president.It also doesnt give her permission to hold them either. What it does say is, the house impeaches, the senate does the trial. She is not allowing the senate to do the trial, thus, obstruction.Well, the credible source is the constitution. The laws she is violating are obstruction of congress, by preventing the senate from carrying out their duty, and by violating trumps due process rights.Funny. What law is Speaker Pelosi violating? What part of the Constitution is she violating? Please be specific and quote credible sources.
Funny. The Constitution does not state a timeline for when she must deliver them to the Senate - or if ever.
FAR more important here though, the republicans managed to ensure they captured the nomination for SCOTUS with their games. What do the democrats get with this little game?
They get to stop the impeachment process? That is what the republicans want, not the democrats. The democrats get nothing from playing this game.
"...the law states you are entitled to a speedy trial. The law states you are entitled to due process..."You're probably right, but again, the law states you are entitled to a speedy trial. The law states you are entitled to due process, and the constitution says the senate has a duty to try all impeachments.It simply doesn't say. So she can hold on to them as long as she likes. Kind of like there's no time frame in the Constitution for when the Senate has to hold confirmation hearings on Supreme Court nominations selected by the president.It also doesnt give her permission to hold them either. What it does say is, the house impeaches, the senate does the trial. She is not allowing the senate to do the trial, thus, obstruction.Well, the credible source is the constitution. The laws she is violating are obstruction of congress, by preventing the senate from carrying out their duty, and by violating trumps due process rights.Funny. What law is Speaker Pelosi violating? What part of the Constitution is she violating? Please be specific and quote credible sources.
Funny. The Constitution does not state a timeline for when she must deliver them to the Senate - or if ever.
Pelosi holding them is putting a block on all of that.
In the absence of clarification, you have to go with what is known. There is no statute for pelosi holding them or not, but there is clear statute, precedent, and law that says she shouldnt.
What law did he break?Impeached Trump broke the law and got himself impeached.Keep talking you, as it shows the plan all along. Use the house while have a majority to abuse that power in order to go after Trump in a last ditch effort. How do we know this ?? It's because the proof is in all the testimony of those who wanted to impeach Trump before he ever got started serving the American people in 2016.LOLOLOLAbsolutely correct that Trump has merely been accused. The senate decides if he’s impeached
Dumbfuck, regardless of what the Senate finds, Impeachment Trump is already impeached and will remain impeached.
View attachment 297800
The Democrats should stand trial for abusing their offices, and their power.
Contributions are anything of value. It does not have to be money. Services can also be a contribution in terms of that law. The service of providing an investigation into a political rival is certainly something of value to Impeached Trump's campaign.No foreign national made any contribution to trump. Trump does not handle his businesses anymore, his kids do.Idiot...Poor little pole smoker.
What law was broken? Can you show us in US code what that is?
Impeached Trump broke the law and got himself impeached.Keep talking you, as it shows the plan all along. Use the house while have a majority to abuse that power in order to go after Trump in a last ditch effort. How do we know this ?? It's because the proof is in all the testimony of those who wanted to impeach Trump before he ever got started serving the American people in 2016.LOLOLOL
Dumbfuck, regardless of what the Senate finds, Impeachment Trump is already impeached and will remain impeached.
View attachment 297800
The Democrats should stand trial for abusing their offices, and their power.
§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
(a) Prohibition
It shall be unlawful for-
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
If foreign nationals stayed at trump properties, they paid for a service, not a donation.
And, as I remember reading, the trump organization returned all the money that was gained from foreign nationals staying at his properties.
At your lunacy? Not me.So, Trump* started a war to detract from his impeachment. Anyone surprised?
Huffpo?REPORT: SHOCKED AIDES WEREN’T SOLD ON ‘INTEL’
Gee, what a surprise. Trump* is wagging the war dog to divert attention from impeachment. I suspect it will bite him hard when the truth comes out.
NYTs?REPORT: SHOCKED AIDES WEREN’T SOLD ON ‘INTEL’
Gee, what a surprise. Trump* is wagging the war dog to divert attention from impeachment. I suspect it will bite him hard when the truth comes out.
They didn't kill him ?
Wait...Huffpost....Fake News.
No, dumbass, The New York Times and the Associated Press.
So, Trump* started a war to detract from his impeachment. Anyone surprised?
REPORT: SHOCKED AIDES WEREN’T SOLD ON ‘INTEL’
Gee, what a surprise. Trump* is wagging the war dog to divert attention from impeachment. I suspect it will bite him hard when the truth comes out.
They didn't kill him ?
Wait...Huffpost....Fake News.
No, dumbass, The New York Times and the Associated Press.
"...the law states you are entitled to a speedy trial. The law states you are entitled to due process..."You're probably right, but again, the law states you are entitled to a speedy trial. The law states you are entitled to due process, and the constitution says the senate has a duty to try all impeachments.It simply doesn't say. So she can hold on to them as long as she likes. Kind of like there's no time frame in the Constitution for when the Senate has to hold confirmation hearings on Supreme Court nominations selected by the president.It also doesnt give her permission to hold them either. What it does say is, the house impeaches, the senate does the trial. She is not allowing the senate to do the trial, thus, obstruction.Well, the credible source is the constitution. The laws she is violating are obstruction of congress, by preventing the senate from carrying out their duty, and by violating trumps due process rights.
Funny. The Constitution does not state a timeline for when she must deliver them to the Senate - or if ever.
Pelosi holding them is putting a block on all of that.
In the absence of clarification, you have to go with what is known. There is no statute for pelosi holding them or not, but there is clear statute, precedent, and law that says she shouldnt.
Those things only apply to criminal cases, which impeachment is not.
Who said she has a say in the Senate's trial?"...the law states you are entitled to a speedy trial. The law states you are entitled to due process..."You're probably right, but again, the law states you are entitled to a speedy trial. The law states you are entitled to due process, and the constitution says the senate has a duty to try all impeachments.It simply doesn't say. So she can hold on to them as long as she likes. Kind of like there's no time frame in the Constitution for when the Senate has to hold confirmation hearings on Supreme Court nominations selected by the president.It also doesnt give her permission to hold them either. What it does say is, the house impeaches, the senate does the trial. She is not allowing the senate to do the trial, thus, obstruction.Funny. The Constitution does not state a timeline for when she must deliver them to the Senate - or if ever.
Pelosi holding them is putting a block on all of that.
In the absence of clarification, you have to go with what is known. There is no statute for pelosi holding them or not, but there is clear statute, precedent, and law that says she shouldnt.
Those things only apply to criminal cases, which impeachment is not.
That is true.
Nancy Botox gets zero, ZERO say in the senate hearing.
She gets to provide farce managers....that is it.
I agree, but nobody has yet proven trump did it for personal gain, or to help his campaign.Contributions are anything of value. It does not have to be money. Services can also be a contribution in terms of that law. The service of providing an investigation into a political rival is certainly something of value to Impeached Trump's campaign.No foreign national made any contribution to trump. Trump does not handle his businesses anymore, his kids do.Idiot...Poor little pole smoker.
What law was broken? Can you show us in US code what that is?
Impeached Trump broke the law and got himself impeached.Keep talking you, as it shows the plan all along. Use the house while have a majority to abuse that power in order to go after Trump in a last ditch effort. How do we know this ?? It's because the proof is in all the testimony of those who wanted to impeach Trump before he ever got started serving the American people in 2016.
The Democrats should stand trial for abusing their offices, and their power.
§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
(a) Prohibition
It shall be unlawful for-
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
If foreign nationals stayed at trump properties, they paid for a service, not a donation.
And, as I remember reading, the trump organization returned all the money that was gained from foreign nationals staying at his properties.
