ESay
Gold Member
- Mar 14, 2015
- 9,130
- 1,933
- 140
Of course, I agree with your rational humanistic perspective. Unfortunately, the Russian-Ukraine-West conflict is political, where. "power" & "distrust" are major stumbling blocks.
It seems to me the current Kremlin leader & his cronies are paranoid about the West surrounding them geographically, and Ukraine is a major card in the poker game.
Putin was pissed that Poland & Baltic states were accepted into the EU & NATO, and nationalistic Russians feel betrayed and fearful, not trusting the West anymore.
For a while, in the 1990's and early 2000's, Russia-NATO relations were actually cooperative, although Russia struggled economically. When Russia's economy prospered in the 2000's, and former USSR countries joined the West, Putin & Russians who support him (86% now, after Ukraine conflict) regained their nationalistic "world power" attitude to stroke their egos.
Will the current relations continue for several more years?
It will come down to economics.
Well, what Russia has been doing in the last 15 years is quite understandable. Every country which considers itself as one of the major powers has to struggle for the sphere of influence – it has always been and it will always be. Everything is quite simple – either you are struggling or you are being forced out on the periphery of international affairs.
After recovering from the economic turmoil of 1990-s, Russia decided that it was the time to get back the role the USSR had played in the world (at least partially). But they have failed to understand that in order to do so, there need to be something more than fairy tales about ‘Russkiy mir’, shirtless photos of their leader, and their boastings like ‘we are going to kick your fucking asses’.