Will you vote for Trump even if he is in jail?

[DBA]

Because MAGA is the closest thing this country has to a terrorist movement

That would be the nut Democrats supporting Hamas.

 

[Lisa558]

I just heard something awful!

 

[Lesh]

USMBcon would vote for Trump even if he raped a baby on 5th Avenue.

Yup

 

[DBA]

And Brandon will easily win a second term because of it. Congratulations.

Only if they cheat...again, which is very likely.

 

[Billiejeens]

Will you vote for Trump even if he is in jail?

Simple question. Well?

Of course.

He won't be.
But, of course.

 

[Lesh]

This verdict will anger Americans. It will virtually guarantee Trump a victory in November.

Nope

 

[Marener]

85% leftist wackos.

Those wackos sure are extremely successful and accomplished.

 

[DBA]

Yup

And you dimwits would vote for Biden even if he sold us out to China. He kinda did.

 

[DBA]

Those wackos sure are extremely successful and accomplished.

So was Hitler and Stalin.

 

[Lesh]

And you dimwits would vote for Biden even if he sold us out to China. He kinda did.

He didn’t and Trump is a criminal

 

[Billiejeens]

Personally, I would love the chance to piss on both of them whether they were on fire or not.

Because you're a pissy ass?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Only if they cheat...again, which is very likely.

You seem very stupid. Perhaps study football instead. Stay in your wheelhouse I believe you will go far.

 

[Billiejeens]

Corrupt ass New York.

Tell me the exact crime again???

That's the kewl part.
The jury got to pick their own.

 

[Marener]

So was Hitler and Stalin.

No they weren’t. Neither achieved any substantial success until they became politicians.

 

[Billiejeens]

USMBcon would vote for Trump even if he raped a baby on 5th Avenue.
[/QUAve.


All of the babies on 5th ave.

 

[Lisa558]

There is precedent in which the SCOTUS said that jurors much ALL agree on the specific violation (I.e., underlying crime) when there is a series of violations. IOW, you cannot have 4 jurors agree on one violation, four others on another, and four others on yet another - and then consider that quakifies as unanimous.

ALL 12 must agree on a SPECIFIC crime.

Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813 (1999)

Richardson v. United States

supreme.justia.com

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

There is precedent in which the SCOTUS said that jurors much ALL agree on the specific violation (I.e., underlying crime) when there is a series of violations. IOW, you cannot have 4 jurors agree on one violation, four others on another, and four others on yet another - and then consider that quakifies as unanimous.

ALL 12 must agree on a SPECIFIC crime.

Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813 (1999)

Richardson v. United States

supreme.justia.com

Are you panicking?

 

[eagle1462010]

That's the kewl part.
The jury got to pick their own.

Yet they havent spelled it to code.

Its still a trial about a porn star who extorted money

 

[candycorn]

Corrupt ass New York.

Tell me the exact crime again???

Records falsification. 34 times.

 

[BluesLegend]

There is precedent in which the SCOTUS said that jurors much ALL agree on the specific violation (I.e., underlying crime) when there is a series of violations. IOW, you cannot have 4 jurors agree on one violation, four others on another, and four others on yet another - and then consider that quakifies as unanimous.

ALL 12 must agree on a SPECIFIC crime.

Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813 (1999)

Richardson v. United States

supreme.justia.com

The corrupt judge repeatedly ruled against Trump's defense team, berated his lawyers, and prevented Trump from presenting a defense.

EXAMPLE: Trump had a government EXPERT on FECA set to testify on the complex federal election law and the corrupt judge denied it. Law so complicated SCOTUS justices have to bring in experts to advise them. INSTEAD the corrupt judge decided he would advise the jury on federal election law.