Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. The only thing that is being displayed is the right wing's complete disregard for liberty and freedom of choice.
And using the courts to hammer it home.
Again, liberty and freedom for some...only the people we deem worthy.
Now go fuck yourself.
The Supreme Court cannot tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. This is Prohibition all over again, and it won't stand, because the women will ignore anti-abortion laws, JUST LIKE THEY HAVE SINCE THE DAYS OF CAVEMEN.
The SC no longer has and legitimacy whatsoever.
When two people want to dissolve their marriage contract, where do they go?
The problem with same sex marriage is that in most States is was implemented by judicial fiat. Gay marriage is not in the Constitution just like abortion isn't.
Sorry, you need to fight this where it belongs, in STATE legislatures, not federal courts.
I'm pro-life and indifferent to gay marriage (if it's passed appropriately by legislatures), so hold your nonsense on my views. I don't automatically see what I want in the law and the Constitution like most people in this country unfortunately do
They didn't! They just left it up to the states to do it.The Supreme Court cannot tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies.
They go before a judge. They have to agree to custody and support of minor children, division of property and a couple of other things I don't recall in the disolution.
The Constitution permits the government to create government agencies. It does not permit the courts to create 'rights'.No Air Force then
That covers it except alimony
Go ahead.I see. So we can pass laws that target black people, as long as they weren't slave previously.
I must be psychic. I knew you and the other filthy leftards would say this.The Supreme Court cannot tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. This is Prohibition all over again, and it won't stand, because the women will ignore anti-abortion laws, JUST LIKE THEY HAVE SINCE THE DAYS OF CAVEMEN.
The SC no longer has and legitimacy whatsoever.
That post isn't an argument. Try again.Wow. More massive ignorance.
It's funny how tards who claim to love the Constitution know absolutely nothing about it.
Married people gets ALL KINDS of perks from the govt that unmarried couples dont. Do you know why that is?
BECAUSE GOVT INVOLVED THEMSELVES WITH MARRIAGE.
Moron
Jesus
The govt is involved with marriage. Why do you condone them discriminating?
The Constitutional thing to do, would be to get the govt completely out of marriage. THAT is the way it should be.
It should have been left as a religious institution. Not a government institution.
The Supreme Court cannot tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. This is Prohibition all over again, and it won't stand, because the women will ignore anti-abortion laws, JUST LIKE THEY HAVE SINCE THE DAYS OF CAVEMEN.
The SC no longer has and legitimacy whatsoever.
The only conceivable thing more absurd than having changed the meaning of the word "marriage" in order to suit the perfidious tastes of a minority would be to go back and re-re-define it in order to suit the perfidious tastes of another minority.
This thread does, however, demonstrate how every topic is permeated with division oriented promotion of hate. Whom does this very consistent action profit?
I've never been much of a reactionary or prone to panic and will not be this time either. This ruling was coming, and we knew it was coming, and that includes you. No. You cannot assume settled law will always be settled law when depending on the continually evolving Supreme Court and in practice, never could on rulings that were activist ruling, enacted because lazy legislators seeking to remain popular refused to act and do their jobs. I suspect if there are more radical moves made, legislative and executive action will be forced, that has been resisted in the past, up to and including expanding the court to get temporary balance and restraint. I will exercise my personal restraint from panicking prematurely.You still don't understand that this just a start. It indicates a legal philosophy that's leads nowhere good. Before this the court was loath to ever take back a right after it has been granted. We can no longer assume anything is settled law or that any right, other than guns, is safe.
What exactly is it you think gays are asking for when they ask for the GOVERNMENT to recognize their marriages, retard?All you're doing is registering the contract.
Recognizing the marriage? You mean a common law marriage?
I can't tell if you are being obtuse or if you are actually this stupid.
Where does one go to get a marriage license?
What exactly is it you think gays are asking for when they ask for the GOVERNMENT to recognize their marriages, retard?
The problem with same sex marriage is that in most States is was implemented by judicial fiat. Gay marriage is not in the Constitution just like abortion isn't.
Sorry, you need to fight this where it belongs, in STATE legislatures, not federal courts.
I'm pro-life and indifferent to gay marriage (if it's passed appropriately by legislatures), so hold your nonsense on my views. I don't automatically see what I want in the law and the Constitution like most people in this country unfortunately do
She's Canadian?No one cares what you think, Canadian
