Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This simply denotes that the left isn't at all interested in 'fairness' - only in how much money they can bring in to the government so they can spend it on buying votes.Is there something about the sentence I am not envious that is too tough for you? Or is it that your whole contention is anyone thinking the rich are taxed too little in comparison to those who earn a living is nothing but envy? Your argument is coming up short! Trying to assign emotions to a legitimate argument is juvenile at best, delusional at worst.
Are you juvenile or delusional?
But they aren't taxed to little. The 1% make 17% of the nations wealth. the 99% make the other 83% of wealth in the nation. The 1% pay 39% of the taxes. 47% of Americans pay no income tax. The other 52% pay the remaining 61% of taxes. So how much more above the 39% of all taxes paid do you consider a "fair share". Please define that term for us. Obama has failed to do so yet.
Is there something about the sentence I am not envious that is too tough for you? Or is it that your whole contention is anyone thinking the rich are taxed too little in comparison to those who earn a living is nothing but envy? Your argument is coming up short! Trying to assign emotions to a legitimate argument is juvenile at best, delusional at worst.Like i said, you don't have the right to steal from others just because you're bitter & envious. You are not entitled to fellow Citizens' income. And you are too far gone to grasp that concept. You're just a very sad case now.
Are you juvenile or delusional?
But they aren't taxed to little. The 1% make 17% of the nations wealth. the 99% make the other 83% of wealth in the nation. The 1% pay 39% of the taxes. 47% of Americans pay no income tax. The other 52% pay the remaining 61% of taxes. So how much more above the 39% of all taxes paid do you consider a "fair share". Please define that term for us. Obama has failed to do so yet.
This simply denotes that the left isn't at all interested in 'fairness' - only in how much money they can bring in to the government so they can spend it on buying votes.Is there something about the sentence I am not envious that is too tough for you? Or is it that your whole contention is anyone thinking the rich are taxed too little in comparison to those who earn a living is nothing but envy? Your argument is coming up short! Trying to assign emotions to a legitimate argument is juvenile at best, delusional at worst.
Are you juvenile or delusional?
But they aren't taxed to little. The 1% make 17% of the nations wealth. the 99% make the other 83% of wealth in the nation. The 1% pay 39% of the taxes. 47% of Americans pay no income tax. The other 52% pay the remaining 61% of taxes. So how much more above the 39% of all taxes paid do you consider a "fair share". Please define that term for us. Obama has failed to do so yet.
Jealous much?
I make Romney's amount in a year and I pay twice that much in tax.
Jealousy has nothing to do with it. I'm PISSED and so should you be.
You understand the money that Romney has already been taxed once, right?
The % you guys are complaining about, is the 2nd time it's been taxed.
I make Romney's amount in a year and I pay twice that much in tax.
Jealousy has nothing to do with it. I'm PISSED and so should you be.
You understand the money that Romney has already been taxed once, right?
The % you guys are complaining about, is the 2nd time it's been taxed.
Yes, that is the scary Republican soundbite. Care to explain to us how Romney was taxed twice on his income?
I make Romney's amount in a year and I pay twice that much in tax.
Jealousy has nothing to do with it. I'm PISSED and so should you be.
You understand the money that Romney has already been taxed once, right?
The % you guys are complaining about, is the 2nd time it's been taxed.
Yes, that is the scary Republican soundbite. Care to explain to us how Romney was taxed twice on his income?
I make Romney's amount in a year and I pay twice that much in tax.
Jealousy has nothing to do with it. I'm PISSED and so should you be.
You understand the money that Romney has already been taxed once, right?
The % you guys are complaining about, is the 2nd time it's been taxed.
Yes, that is the scary Republican soundbite. Care to explain to us how Romney was taxed twice on his income?
You understand the money that Romney has already been taxed once, right?
The % you guys are complaining about, is the 2nd time it's been taxed.
Yes, that is the scary Republican soundbite. Care to explain to us how Romney was taxed twice on his income?
Because dividends are dispersed after profits are taxed. Simple I know, but I won't be shocked if this requires further explanation.
Yes, that is the scary Republican soundbite. Care to explain to us how Romney was taxed twice on his income?
Because dividends are dispersed after profits are taxed. Simple I know, but I won't be shocked if this requires further explanation.
The company pays a corporate tax rate on it's profits. The dividend the company pays is new income and is taxed at a capital gains rate because it is going to another person. The fact is, every time money changes hands, it is taxed.
If I earn $100 dollars and I pay tax on that, then I buy something from someone for $50, that person has to pay tax on that $50. It is erroneous to claim that other person is exempt from paying tax on the $50 I give him because I already paid tax on my $100.
What do you base this inane presumption on?Speaking of juvenile...Is there something about the sentence I am not envious that is too tough for you?Like i said, you don't have the right to steal from others just because you're bitter & envious. You are not entitled to fellow Citizens' income. And you are too far gone to grasp that concept. You're just a very sad case now.
You believe that you are entitled to more than what you have, and you believe that you deserve to have the wealthy give it to you.
You must have me confused with some other delusion. Or, you are stumped (not far from the realm of possibilities) and have decided if you can't win a debate, you'll just put words in my mouth. Either way, you're as wrong as the policies you espouse.Speaking of juvenile...Is there something about the sentence I am not envious that is too tough for you?Like i said, you don't have the right to steal from others just because you're bitter & envious. You are not entitled to fellow Citizens' income. And you are too far gone to grasp that concept. You're just a very sad case now.
You believe that you are entitled to more than what you have, and you believe that you deserve to have the wealthy give it to you.
Because dividends are dispersed after profits are taxed. Simple I know, but I won't be shocked if this requires further explanation.
The company pays a corporate tax rate on it's profits. The dividend the company pays is new income and is taxed at a capital gains rate because it is going to another person. The fact is, every time money changes hands, it is taxed.
If I earn $100 dollars and I pay tax on that, then I buy something from someone for $50, that person has to pay tax on that $50. It is erroneous to claim that other person is exempt from paying tax on the $50 I give him because I already paid tax on my $100.
The sad thing is that tax system you laid out, how horrible it is, only one of us has a problem with the entire population being subject to that.
And it's not you.
I make Romney's amount in a year and I pay twice that much in tax.
Jealousy has nothing to do with it. I'm PISSED and so should you be.
You understand the money that Romney has already been taxed once, right?
The % you guys are complaining about, is the 2nd time it's been taxed.
Yes, that is the scary Republican soundbite. Care to explain to us how Romney was taxed twice on his income?
The company pays a corporate tax rate on it's profits. The dividend the company pays is new income and is taxed at a capital gains rate because it is going to another person. The fact is, every time money changes hands, it is taxed.
If I earn $100 dollars and I pay tax on that, then I buy something from someone for $50, that person has to pay tax on that $50. It is erroneous to claim that other person is exempt from paying tax on the $50 I give him because I already paid tax on my $100.
The sad thing is that tax system you laid out, how horrible it is, only one of us has a problem with the entire population being subject to that.
And it's not you.
You are incorrect. I do have a problem with the entire population being subject to the capital gains rate. I would like to see the top 1% pay more, especially since they've been raking it in over the last 3 years.
Managment begs labor to concede wages and benefits. The resulting profit is then applied to the bottom line and the stock price shoots up. A few investors make as staggering amount of money, the labor force has to scrape by on less. Is that fair?This simply denotes that the left isn't at all interested in 'fairness' - only in how much money they can bring in to the government so they can spend it on buying votes.But they aren't taxed to little. The 1% make 17% of the nations wealth. the 99% make the other 83% of wealth in the nation. The 1% pay 39% of the taxes. 47% of Americans pay no income tax. The other 52% pay the remaining 61% of taxes. So how much more above the 39% of all taxes paid do you consider a "fair share". Please define that term for us. Obama has failed to do so yet.
Funny how they can't define "fair". I have 10 acres and you have 4. Is that fair or unfair? Should I have to give up 3 of my acres so we are equal? Is that fair? Fair and fair share are class warfare buzzwords that have yet to be defined. I guess its like pornography. You can't define it, but you know it when you see it.
Ah.You must have me confused with some other delusion. Or, you are stumped (not far from the realm of possibilities) and have decided if you can't win a debate, you'll just put words in my mouth. Either way, you're as wrong as the policies you espouse.Speaking of juvenile...Is there something about the sentence I am not envious that is too tough for you?
You believe that you are entitled to more than what you have, and you believe that you deserve to have the wealthy give it to you.
Managment begs labor to concede wages and benefits. The resulting profit is then applied to the bottom line and the stock price shoots up. A few investors make as staggering amount of money, the labor force has to scrape by on less. Is that fair?This simply denotes that the left isn't at all interested in 'fairness' - only in how much money they can bring in to the government so they can spend it on buying votes.
Funny how they can't define "fair". I have 10 acres and you have 4. Is that fair or unfair? Should I have to give up 3 of my acres so we are equal? Is that fair? Fair and fair share are class warfare buzzwords that have yet to be defined. I guess its like pornography. You can't define it, but you know it when you see it.
If you want to argue by anecdote, use one that applies.
It's amazing what you can do if you plan ahead and work hard.
Especially if your daddy was CEO of American Motors and Gov. of Michigan.
President Obama was able to achieve what Romney has been chasing for a decade without the advantage of Romney - White, uber Rich and by virtue of his birth a member of the power elite.
