rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 284,426
- 155,107
The doctor fully examined the case and made a recommendation for treatment....the pharmacist is a pill pusher and knows nothing about the case
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would think he should help her find a pharmacist to accommodate her.But in this case the baby had died so there is no harm!Religious ethics is part of the greater medical ethics question. The physicians oath is to 'Do no harm'.
Any nurse, pharmacist, or other medical practitioner is duty bound to reject to implement a physician's medical orders if they have reason to believe it will do harm.
Again, I don't know the full details but it seems curious that a physician was prescribing a drug to induce termination when the regular procedure for a miscarriage is a D&C to remove any fetal tissue that could complicate a future pregnancy.
Miscarriages are common so there must be something happening here that isn't being reported that caused the pharmacist be unwilling to prescribe a medication. We might never know the facts of the case and some of us will make snap judgements based on our belief system.i do not know about pharmacists but nurses and doctors have every right to say no to participating in abortion.No, they are NOT "dominating other people's lives." They are simply making personal choices for their OWN LIFE, which you clearly insist on dominating.There is much too much of these pharmacists trying to dominate other people's lives these days
They definitely are trying to dominate others' lives by being obstructionists. Guys like this need to be shown the door. Why should she have had the burden placed on her? She's the one who went through this experience on the say-so of someone who may have been a perfect stranger and someone to whom she had no obligation. And, as I said, she had no warning.
Any person who can't do his or her job should find another line of work.
What would be appropriate compensation for the woman involved here?
I never hear anyone mention the victims in these situations, just the "holy" folks, provided, of course, that they are members of the "correct" religion. This woman was already stressed out, and this jackass made it worse.
Pharmacists can refuse at any time.The doctor fully examined the case and made a recommendation for treatment....the pharmacist is a pill pusher and knows nothing about the case
Hello! The baby had died!She's stressed, agreed. More reason to have a 48 hour delay.But in this case the baby had died so there is no harm!Religious ethics is part of the greater medical ethics question. The physicians oath is to 'Do no harm'.
Any nurse, pharmacist, or other medical practitioner is duty bound to reject to implement a physician's medical orders if they have reason to believe it will do harm.
Again, I don't know the full details but it seems curious that a physician was prescribing a drug to induce termination when the regular procedure for a miscarriage is a D&C to remove any fetal tissue that could complicate a future pregnancy.
Miscarriages are common so there must be something happening here that isn't being reported that caused the pharmacist be unwilling to prescribe a medication. We might never know the facts of the case and some of us will make snap judgements based on our belief system.i do not know about pharmacists but nurses and doctors have every right to say no to participating in abortion.No, they are NOT "dominating other people's lives." They are simply making personal choices for their OWN LIFE, which you clearly insist on dominating.There is much too much of these pharmacists trying to dominate other people's lives these days
They definitely are trying to dominate others' lives by being obstructionists. Guys like this need to be shown the door. Why should she have had the burden placed on her? She's the one who went through this experience on the say-so of someone who may have been a perfect stranger and someone to whom she had no obligation. And, as I said, she had no warning.
Any person who can't do his or her job should find another line of work.
What would be appropriate compensation for the woman involved here?
I never hear anyone mention the victims in these situations, just the "holy" folks, provided, of course, that they are members of the "correct" religion. This woman was already stressed out, and this jackass made it worse.
Pharmacists can refuse at any time.The doctor fully examined the case and made a recommendation for treatment....the pharmacist is a pill pusher and knows nothing about the case
Clearly you're wrong.the pharmacist is a pill pusher and knows nothing about the case
Again, how do you know that? This is a CNN STORY (and I do mean "story")Hello! The baby had died!She's stressed, agreed. More reason to have a 48 hour delay.But in this case the baby had died so there is no harm!
Again, I don't know the full details but it seems curious that a physician was prescribing a drug to induce termination when the regular procedure for a miscarriage is a D&C to remove any fetal tissue that could complicate a future pregnancy.
Miscarriages are common so there must be something happening here that isn't being reported that caused the pharmacist be unwilling to prescribe a medication. We might never know the facts of the case and some of us will make snap judgements based on our belief system.i do not know about pharmacists but nurses and doctors have every right to say no to participating in abortion.No, they are NOT "dominating other people's lives." They are simply making personal choices for their OWN LIFE, which you clearly insist on dominating.
They definitely are trying to dominate others' lives by being obstructionists. Guys like this need to be shown the door. Why should she have had the burden placed on her? She's the one who went through this experience on the say-so of someone who may have been a perfect stranger and someone to whom she had no obligation. And, as I said, she had no warning.
Any person who can't do his or her job should find another line of work.
What would be appropriate compensation for the woman involved here?
I never hear anyone mention the victims in these situations, just the "holy" folks, provided, of course, that they are members of the "correct" religion. This woman was already stressed out, and this jackass made it worse.
Wrong. Baby was alive.Hello! The baby had died!She's stressed, agreed. More reason to have a 48 hour delay.But in this case the baby had died so there is no harm!
Again, I don't know the full details but it seems curious that a physician was prescribing a drug to induce termination when the regular procedure for a miscarriage is a D&C to remove any fetal tissue that could complicate a future pregnancy.
Miscarriages are common so there must be something happening here that isn't being reported that caused the pharmacist be unwilling to prescribe a medication. We might never know the facts of the case and some of us will make snap judgements based on our belief system.i do not know about pharmacists but nurses and doctors have every right to say no to participating in abortion.No, they are NOT "dominating other people's lives." They are simply making personal choices for their OWN LIFE, which you clearly insist on dominating.
They definitely are trying to dominate others' lives by being obstructionists. Guys like this need to be shown the door. Why should she have had the burden placed on her? She's the one who went through this experience on the say-so of someone who may have been a perfect stranger and someone to whom she had no obligation. And, as I said, she had no warning.
Any person who can't do his or her job should find another line of work.
What would be appropriate compensation for the woman involved here?
I never hear anyone mention the victims in these situations, just the "holy" folks, provided, of course, that they are members of the "correct" religion. This woman was already stressed out, and this jackass made it worse.
The pharmacist was doing harm to the woman.
Parents who for religious reason withhold medical care for children are doing harm.
Those types of people should be hung in the public square.
Can't do your job...get another one.HowThe pharmacist refused on religious grounds. Fortunately, he was firedtolerantbigoted of you
Your body, your choice. We'll March on Tuesday.I always get refused service at the local pub.![]()
There was harm to the woman by the pharmacist...and the trumpanzees here cheer him on. It was never about supporting women.....it's always been about controlling women.But in this case the baby had died so there is no harm!Religious ethics is part of the greater medical ethics question. The physicians oath is to 'Do no harm'.
Any nurse, pharmacist, or other medical practitioner is duty bound to reject to implement a physician's medical orders if they have reason to believe it will do harm.
No, he didn't. The woman did.the pharmacist has ‘violated’ no religious dogma
That's what I keep telling my bartender.There was harm to the woman by the pharmacist...and the trumpanzees here cheer him on. It was never about supporting women.....it's always been about controlling women.But in this case the baby had died so there is no harm!Religious ethics is part of the greater medical ethics question. The physicians oath is to 'Do no harm'.
Any nurse, pharmacist, or other medical practitioner is duty bound to reject to implement a physician's medical orders if they have reason to believe it will do harm.
She's stressed, agreed. More reason to have a 48 hour delay.But in this case the baby had died so there is no harm!Religious ethics is part of the greater medical ethics question. The physicians oath is to 'Do no harm'.
Any nurse, pharmacist, or other medical practitioner is duty bound to reject to implement a physician's medical orders if they have reason to believe it will do harm.
Again, I don't know the full details but it seems curious that a physician was prescribing a drug to induce termination when the regular procedure for a miscarriage is a D&C to remove any fetal tissue that could complicate a future pregnancy.
Miscarriages are common so there must be something happening here that isn't being reported that caused the pharmacist be unwilling to prescribe a medication. We might never know the facts of the case and some of us will make snap judgements based on our belief system.i do not know about pharmacists but nurses and doctors have every right to say no to participating in abortion.No, they are NOT "dominating other people's lives." They are simply making personal choices for their OWN LIFE, which you clearly insist on dominating.There is much too much of these pharmacists trying to dominate other people's lives these days
They definitely are trying to dominate others' lives by being obstructionists. Guys like this need to be shown the door. Why should she have had the burden placed on her? She's the one who went through this experience on the say-so of someone who may have been a perfect stranger and someone to whom she had no obligation. And, as I said, she had no warning.
Any person who can't do his or her job should find another line of work.
What would be appropriate compensation for the woman involved here?
I never hear anyone mention the victims in these situations, just the "holy" folks, provided, of course, that they are members of the "correct" religion. This woman was already stressed out, and this jackass made it worse.
Again, how do you know that? This is a CNN STORY (and I do mean "story")Hello! The baby had died!She's stressed, agreed. More reason to have a 48 hour delay.Again, I don't know the full details but it seems curious that a physician was prescribing a drug to induce termination when the regular procedure for a miscarriage is a D&C to remove any fetal tissue that could complicate a future pregnancy.
Miscarriages are common so there must be something happening here that isn't being reported that caused the pharmacist be unwilling to prescribe a medication. We might never know the facts of the case and some of us will make snap judgements based on our belief system.i do not know about pharmacists but nurses and doctors have every right to say no to participating in abortion.They definitely are trying to dominate others' lives by being obstructionists. Guys like this need to be shown the door. Why should she have had the burden placed on her? She's the one who went through this experience on the say-so of someone who may have been a perfect stranger and someone to whom she had no obligation. And, as I said, she had no warning.
Any person who can't do his or her job should find another line of work.
What would be appropriate compensation for the woman involved here?
I never hear anyone mention the victims in these situations, just the "holy" folks, provided, of course, that they are members of the "correct" religion. This woman was already stressed out, and this jackass made it worse.