Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, it is. They have a mandatory one child rule and if a woman gets pregnant with a second one abortion is mandatory.What about people stuck in a Right Wing Religious nut job hellhole called TEXAS.
Hopefully Kate is preparing to move.
Just in case.
Teabaggers want to take their stupidity......NATIONAL.
Abortion isn't mandatory in China.
unless you live in Kentucky, what Rand Paul says or believes is none of your fricken business. Why do you think its OK to murder an unborn human being? or worse yet, murder him/her just after birth?Bear in mind, MAGA MAGGOTS only science when shit heads like Rand Paul spout nonsense.
wrong, there is a lot of hard sound video evidence of election fraud in 2020. the left wing media and the DC establishment has managed to hide it so far, but its slowly coming out. Senile joe did not win in 2020, the 2020 election was a coup of the US government, not a free election.The same place the evidence proving the 2020 Election was rigged, nowhere. There isn't any.
Did you get lost? This thread is about the state of Texas telling this woman she can’t about a fetus that has no chance to live if it even reached termwrong, there is a lot of hard sound video evidence of election fraud in 2020. the left wing media and the DC establishment has managed to hide it so far, but its slowly coming out. Senile joe did not win in 2020, the 2020 election was a coup of the US government, not a free election.
That is incorrect. As mentioned and sourced by both myself and others, the baby can survive. Ms. Cox didn't want to contend with a child that would require extra attention, so would rather kill her child. As noted in the response to her claim, her doctor would not back her up on her claims.“Clearly not needed”?
The fetus was not going to survive beyond days if it made it that far.
What’s wrong with you?
Again this is incorrect info. The baby can survive, and Ms. Cox rightfully did not qualify to kill her child. Not sure why you keep posting that the baby had no chance. I know there are a lot of pages of posts, but medical links have been provided along with the rebuttal from the State of Texas.Did you get lost? This thread is about the state of Texas telling this woman she can’t about a fetus that has no chance to live if it even reached term
You guys
That is incorrect. As mentioned and sourced by both myself and others, the baby can survive. Ms. Cox didn't want to contend with a child that would require extra attention, so would rather kill her child. As noted in the response to her claim, her doctor would not back her up on her claims.
Contrary to her statement, her doctor did NOT back her up. See post 549.Where did you get your medical degree? Where did you do your intership and what was your residency and where do you practice?
Ms. Cox needed an abortion. The fetus was NOT viable and have died a painful death. The delivery of the fetus could have killed her or rendered her incapable of having other children. Who are you decide what medical treatments Ms. Cox can undergo?
my.clevelandclinic.org
So your solution to stopping her from future abortions is to make it so that she can never be pregnant again?Contrary to her statement, her doctor did NOT back her up. See post 549.
You don't need a medical degree to look up survival statistics.
Edwards Syndrome (Trisomy 18): Genetic Condition, Symptoms & Outlook
Edwards syndrome (trisomy 18) is a genetic condition where three cells attach to chromosome 18, causing growth delays that can be life-threatening.
Funny thing is, you really don't care. You just want her to be able to have an abortion for whatever reason. I think you know Texas held true to their laws, but you want the law ignored just like Ms. Cox.
That was her statement, however, I don't see where the doctor backed that up. We already know she lied to try and get the abortion, so we must assume she lied here as well.So your solution to stopping her from future abortions is to make it so that she can never be pregnant again?
Wow
Now that more info is available on this story, we know Ms. Cox lied. I am guessing she wanted an abortion because the care this child might need would be "inconvenient". I am so tired of these convenience killings.unless you live in Kentucky, what Rand Paul says or believes is none of your fricken business. Why do you think its OK to murder an unborn human being? or worse yet, murder him/her just after birth?
Using your "logic" why not allow parents to kill kids up to 2 years old if they become "inconvenient"?
Maybe. We shall see.
So your solution to stopping her from future abortions is to make it so that she can never be pregnant again?
Wow
She shouldn't have gotten pregnant in the first place.
I think the language Ken Paxton and the Texas Supreme Court is using is much more profane.Nice language, Tiny Tim.
And accurate!Brilliant analysis, just brilliant.
Because in the lawsuit she filed her doctor "Dr. Karsan did not assert that Ms. Cox has a “life-threatening physical condition” or that, in Dr. Karsan’s reasonable medical judgment, an abortion is necessary because Ms. Cox has the type of condition the exception requires."If it’s “up to the physician”, how could he possibly not meet the standard?
What is profane about "Dr. Karsan did not assert that Ms. Cox has a “life-threatening physical condition” or that, in Dr. Karsan’s reasonable medical judgment, an abortion is necessary because Ms. Cox has the type of condition the exception requires."I think the language Ken Paxton and the Texas Supreme Court is using is much more profane.
Again, not what her own doctor alleges.So your solution to stopping her from future abortions is to make it so that she can never be pregnant again?
Wow
