🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Worst President in U.S. History

Yup, that's what he is. Obama has just really fucked this country up. Yup, he sure has.

It's a bad day at the Wall Street Journal when they have to go to press with news like this. They're going to have to revert their Op Ed section back to....Op Ed, instead of "Why We Hate Obama".


Jobless Claims Fall By 20,000 in March 28 Week
Initial claims for jobless benefits near the lowest level in 15 years

Jobless Claims Fall By 20 000 in March 28 Week - WSJ
WASHINGTON—The number of Americans seeking first-time unemployment benefits fell to near the lowest level in 15 years last week, a sign of continued improvement in the labor market.

Initial jobless claims decreased by 20,000 to a seasonally adjusted 268,000 in the week ended March 28, the Labor Department said Thursday. Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had expected 285,000 new claims.

Last week’s level was just about above the 267,000 new claims filed in the Jan. 24 week. Claims that week were the lowest since the spring of 2000."""

Right before the idiots elected Dubya!





Wow...really? Turns out that workforce participation is at a 36 year low. But never let a thing like facts get in the way of an unethical lying idealogue.

Workforce Participation at 36-Year Low as Jobs Climb

The share of the working-age population either employed or seeking a job declined in April for the first time this year, helping drive the unemployment rate down to 6.3 percent, the lowest since September 2008. At 62.8 percent, the so-called participation rate matches the lowest since March 1978.


Workforce Participation at 36-Year Low as Jobs Climb - Bloomberg Business

This article is a year old. Check the date on my link and read it, you might learn something.
unhinged loser; what could anybody possibly learn from you?

OH SHIT!!! Nobody said we would be learning stuff!!! Will there be TESTS????? Nobody said there would be tests!!!!
 
lol!! it's your thread
you should be able to defend your opinion from anybody

coward
 
Soon the historians will rate Obama. The problem with the historian's rating is that they go beyond what the politician's write and take into account all the factors of the economy, of the world and so on. They will also take into account the opposing party's attempt to make Obama a one term president. In the historians last rating of presidents Bush was rated fifth worst US president.
In the meantime I think I'll wait for the movie to come out.
 
there's a few RW who will admit what a fuck up 43 really was ... and there's the people who still support 43 and his two terms in office ... those morons have to take off their shoes to count to 7 ... web feet confuse them. Take bedowhine for instance

I have more than a few conservative friends. They will admit in privacy, after checking for bugs and patting me down, that they hate Bush.
 
Threads like this are always stupid I don't care if they come from the left or the right it's always the same thing you cherry pick the numbers that support your view and ignore everything that doesn't. Has the economy improved some yes it has is it great no it's not.

I didn't cherry-pick info. I posted an article by a verified news source, albeit very right wing.

If you were a subscriber to the WSJ you would appreciate how much it GAGGED them to publish that article.
Yeah right if the same WSJ published an article you disagreed you would discount them in a second. Unlike the hard right I don't claim Obama is the worst President in history nor do I claim he's the best as the hard left like to do he has been an average President and unless something drastic happens before he leaves office that's likely how history will judge him.
 
Threads like this are always stupid I don't care if they come from the left or the right it's always the same thing you cherry pick the numbers that support your view and ignore everything that doesn't. Has the economy improved some yes it has is it great no it's not.

I didn't cherry-pick info. I posted an article by a verified news source, albeit very right wing.

If you were a subscriber to the WSJ you would appreciate how much it GAGGED them to publish that article.
Yeah right if the same WSJ published an article you disagreed you would discount them in a second. Unlike the hard right I don't claim Obama is the worst President in history nor do I claim he's the best as the hard left like to do he has been an average President and unless something drastic happens before he leaves office that's likely how history will judge him.
 
There's NO reasoning with right wingers and their moronic hatred of Obama.....

When GWB "paid" for 2 costly wars, Medicare Part D on a maxed out credit, AND issued huge tax cuts for his cronies, Obama's help with how the economy is rebounding, is close to a miracle....

It doesn't make a stitch of difference what these right wingers think, since their lack of objective rationale leads to self-imposed hatred and disbelief about anything positive.

Just wait until a diplomatic agreement (instead of war) is reached with Iran.
 
Last edited:
Soon the historians will rate Obama. The problem with the historian's rating is that they go beyond what the politician's write and take into account all the factors of the economy, of the world and so on. They will also take into account the opposing party's attempt to make Obama a one term president. In the historians last rating of presidents Bush was rated fifth worst US president.
In the meantime I think I'll wait for the movie to come out.

God forbid a movie. Although he did write a book about his father, "41", another failure of his. And now, the right wing, in their idiocy, is getting ready to continue the Bush dynasty, all the while claiming to be independent and loathing of monarchies.
 
Threads like this are always stupid I don't care if they come from the left or the right it's always the same thing you cherry pick the numbers that support your view and ignore everything that doesn't. Has the economy improved some yes it has is it great no it's not.

I didn't cherry-pick info. I posted an article by a verified news source, albeit very right wing.

If you were a subscriber to the WSJ you would appreciate how much it GAGGED them to publish that article.
Yeah right if the same WSJ published an article you disagreed you would discount them in a second. Unlike the hard right I don't claim Obama is the worst President in history nor do I claim he's the best as the hard left like to do he has been an average President and unless something drastic happens before he leaves office that's likely how history will judge him.
 
Threads like this are always stupid I don't care if they come from the left or the right it's always the same thing you cherry pick the numbers that support your view and ignore everything that doesn't. Has the economy improved some yes it has is it great no it's not.

I didn't cherry-pick info. I posted an article by a verified news source, albeit very right wing.

If you were a subscriber to the WSJ you would appreciate how much it GAGGED them to publish that article.
Yeah right if the same WSJ published an article you disagreed you would discount them in a second. Unlike the hard right I don't claim Obama is the worst President in history nor do I claim he's the best as the hard left like to do he has been an average President and unless something drastic happens before he leaves office that's likely how history will judge him.

I read the WSJ every day. I disagree with them daily. They push the envelope since Rupert Murdoch took control, and really kill Obama in the opinion section. So when they publish an article like this, it's noteworthy. Somebody will probably lose their job.
 
There's NO reasoning with right wingers and their moronic hatred of Obama.....

When GWB "paid" for 2 costly wars, Medicare Part D on a maxed out credit, AND issued huge tax cuts for his cronies, Obama's help with how the economy is rebounding, is close to a miracle....

It doesn't make a stitch of difference what these right wingers think, since their lack of objective rationale is futile.

Nat, you are trying to make them think about actions and consequences. That's not going to happen. They wanted Obama to wave a magic wand in 2009 and turn a battleship around in a bathtub.
 
Threads like this are always stupid I don't care if they come from the left or the right it's always the same thing you cherry pick the numbers that support your view and ignore everything that doesn't. Has the economy improved some yes it has is it great no it's not.

I didn't cherry-pick info. I posted an article by a verified news source, albeit very right wing.

If you were a subscriber to the WSJ you would appreciate how much it GAGGED them to publish that article.
Yeah right if the same WSJ published an article you disagreed you would discount them in a second. Unlike the hard right I don't claim Obama is the worst President in history nor do I claim he's the best as the hard left like to do he has been an average President and unless something drastic happens before he leaves office that's likely how history will judge him.

I read the WSJ every day. I disagree with them daily. They push the envelope since Rupert Murdoch took control, and really kill Obama in the opinion section. So when they publish an article like this, it's noteworthy. Somebody will probably lose their job.
Somebody will probably lose their job really? The sad part is you might really believe that.
 
Soon the historians will rate Obama. The problem with the historian's rating is that they go beyond what the politician's write and take into account all the factors of the economy, of the world and so on. They will also take into account the opposing party's attempt to make Obama a one term president. In the historians last rating of presidents Bush was rated fifth worst US president.
In the meantime I think I'll wait for the movie to come out.



LMAO!1

the Left are a laughable bunch of clowns i swear!!

since when did BOTH PARTIES not do all they could to make the other guy a one-term president?
 
There's NO reasoning with right wingers and their moronic hatred of Obama.....

When GWB "paid" for 2 costly wars, Medicare Part D on a maxed out credit, AND issued huge tax cuts for his cronies, Obama's help with how the economy is rebounding, is close to a miracle....

It doesn't make a stitch of difference what these right wingers think, since their lack of objective rationale is futile.

Nat, you are trying to make them think about actions and consequences. That's not going to happen. They wanted Obama to wave a magic wand in 2009 and turn a battleship around in a bathtub.


there is no reasoning with the cultists of obama adoration
 
Nat, you are trying to make them think about actions and consequences. That's not going to happen. They wanted Obama to wave a magic wand in 2009 and turn a battleship around in a bathtub.


True, and I well remember the quip that someone stated about if Obama could walk on water, right wingers would be in a tizzy about the fact that he couldn't swim.
 
left-wingers are secularists and that is their religion. As such they see their leaders as God-like
it's the same all over the world with left-wing nutjobs

from North Korea to
 
You seem to hate reality.



Threads like this are always stupid I don't care if they come from the left or the right it's always the same thing you cherry pick the numbers that support your view and ignore everything that doesn't. Has the economy improved some yes it has is it great no it's not.

I didn't cherry-pick info. I posted an article by a verified news source, albeit very right wing.

If you were a subscriber to the WSJ you would appreciate how much it GAGGED them to publish that article.
Yeah right if the same WSJ published an article you disagreed you would discount them in a second. Unlike the hard right I don't claim Obama is the worst President in history nor do I claim he's the best as the hard left like to do he has been an average President and unless something drastic happens before he leaves office that's likely how history will judge him.
 
left-wingers are secularists and that is their religion. As such they see their leaders as God-like
it's the same all over the world with left-wing nutjobs

from North Korea to


TO IRAQ AND SYRIA; which were BOTH SOCIALIST BAATH PARTY REGIMES (syria still is) both economically and politically; to yugoslavia, to cuba, to venezuala..................left-wingers are cultists who worship their leaders, no matter how failed or destructive; as gods
 
there is no reasoning with the cultists of obama adoration

Far, far from "adoration"....but your blatant. stupid, unwarranted and constant hatred says a heck of a lot more about your imbecility.

You've got 2 years to prepare your hateful BS about Hillary.....Get started.
 
Soon the historians will rate Obama. The problem with the historian's rating is that they go beyond what the politician's write and take into account all the factors of the economy, of the world and so on. They will also take into account the opposing party's attempt to make Obama a one term president. In the historians last rating of presidents Bush was rated fifth worst US president.
In the meantime I think I'll wait for the movie to come out.



LMAO!1

the Left are a laughable bunch of clowns i swear!!

since when did BOTH PARTIES not do all they could to make the other guy a one-term president?
It has happened where the nation's well being came ahead of politics. Might read some history.
 
left-wingers are secularists and that is their religion. As such they see their leaders as God-like
it's the same all over the world with left-wing nutjobs

from North Korea to

If you had more functioning brain cells you'd know that the definition of "secularism" (the belief that religion should not be part of public affairs) means that secularists do NOT see anyone as "god-like"......But since you are an idiot, we should probably forgive you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top