Would you vote for Biden knowing he plans to expand the Supreme Court’s size?

[White 6]

For those who do not know the threat to our democratic system of government, if our Supreme Court were to have its number of seats doubled in size and its new members arbitrarily filled by the leadership of an existing political party, Venezuela ought to serve as a chilling contemporary warning, and cause every freedom loving American voter to be fearful of “court packing”, and that means “court packing” by either political party!


In 2012, Hugo Chavez, the socialist president of Venezuela died, and was replaced by Chavez’s hand-picked, Nicolás Maduro. Soon thereafter, the Supreme Court that was “packed” with 12 new Justices loyal to President Hugo Chávez’s party, begins to neuter and destroy Venezuela’s democratic system of government. See: 2013: Maduro Challenged by Opposition Leader

“As Venezuela’s situation worsens, the Maduro regime arrests opposition political leaders and shuts down news websites and detains journalists, leading to criticism from the U.N. and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In 2017, Venezuela’s Supreme Court, filled with Maduro loyalists, take away the powers of the National Assembly, increasing Maduro’s control. The following year, he is reelected overwhelmingly in an election that a coalition of other western hemisphere nations says “lacked legitimacy.”

In another article dated, 2004, by Human Rights Watch, Venezuela: Chávez Allies Pack Supreme Court we find:

“Five years ago, President Chávez’s supporters helped to enshrine the principle of judicial independence in a new democratic constitution,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “Now, by packing the country’s highest court, they are betraying that principle and degrading Venezuelan democracy.”

And here we are today, with a Democrat Party Leadership controlled by “socialists”, refusing to tell voters if they intend to “pack” our Supreme Court, which most certainly would lead to a devastating assault on our democratic system of government, and reduce it to a Venezuelan type dictatorship, ruled by unelected Justices hand-picked by the Leadership of a socialist opposition political party.

Before you vote, I suggest you view the following video giving a glimpse into our future should our Supreme Court be packed by the Leadership of a political party.






Forewarned is forearmed! May God Bless the United States and her citizens.

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [our Supreme Court] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Yes. I will still vote for Joe Biden even if he were to publicly state he would pack the court if trump pushes through confirmation without regard to election completion or outcome. Elections have consequences and so do tactics of the current duplicitous republicans to pack the court without regard for listening to the American People.

It’s his obligation to nominate somebody for the vacancy. Every president has done this

Just like it was Mitch's to his base, when he lied to say it was too close to the election to even consider the last president's nomination, and then closed the debate, only to reverse when in his bases favor. People do not forget duplicity. Bad tactics leave a sour aftertaste that does not go away.

Actually he said they wouldn't vote in Obama's pick, so there was no reason to have a vote on it. You can do that when you run the senate, but don't let the facts get in your way.

His nomination deserved a hearing. He didn't get it. They could have voted him down and satisfied you, but he deserved a hearing. There is no getting around that. Nobody is stupid enough to think it was right to deny a hearing because too close to election, but correct now, while the election is going on. You need to smell what you are shoveling.

He wasn't going to be confirmed no matter what.

I guess we will never know, since Moscow Mitch carried the water, will we?

 

[eagle1462010]

For those who do not know the threat to our democratic system of government, if our Supreme Court were to have its number of seats doubled in size and its new members arbitrarily filled by the leadership of an existing political party, Venezuela ought to serve as a chilling contemporary warning, and cause every freedom loving American voter to be fearful of “court packing”, and that means “court packing” by either political party!


In 2012, Hugo Chavez, the socialist president of Venezuela died, and was replaced by Chavez’s hand-picked, Nicolás Maduro. Soon thereafter, the Supreme Court that was “packed” with 12 new Justices loyal to President Hugo Chávez’s party, begins to neuter and destroy Venezuela’s democratic system of government. See: 2013: Maduro Challenged by Opposition Leader

“As Venezuela’s situation worsens, the Maduro regime arrests opposition political leaders and shuts down news websites and detains journalists, leading to criticism from the U.N. and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In 2017, Venezuela’s Supreme Court, filled with Maduro loyalists, take away the powers of the National Assembly, increasing Maduro’s control. The following year, he is reelected overwhelmingly in an election that a coalition of other western hemisphere nations says “lacked legitimacy.”

In another article dated, 2004, by Human Rights Watch, Venezuela: Chávez Allies Pack Supreme Court we find:

“Five years ago, President Chávez’s supporters helped to enshrine the principle of judicial independence in a new democratic constitution,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “Now, by packing the country’s highest court, they are betraying that principle and degrading Venezuelan democracy.”

And here we are today, with a Democrat Party Leadership controlled by “socialists”, refusing to tell voters if they intend to “pack” our Supreme Court, which most certainly would lead to a devastating assault on our democratic system of government, and reduce it to a Venezuelan type dictatorship, ruled by unelected Justices hand-picked by the Leadership of a socialist opposition political party.

Before you vote, I suggest you view the following video giving a glimpse into our future should our Supreme Court be packed by the Leadership of a political party.






Forewarned is forearmed! May God Bless the United States and her citizens.

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [our Supreme Court] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Yes. I will still vote for Joe Biden even if he were to publicly state he would pack the court if trump pushes through confirmation without regard to election completion or outcome. Elections have consequences and so do tactics of the current duplicitous republicans to pack the court without regard for listening to the American People.

It’s his obligation to nominate somebody for the vacancy. Every president has done this

Just like it was Mitch's to his base, when he lied to say it was too close to the election to even consider the last president's nomination, and then closed the debate, only to reverse when in his bases favor. People do not forget duplicity. Bad tactics leave a sour aftertaste that does not go away.

Actually he said they wouldn't vote in Obama's pick, so there was no reason to have a vote on it. You can do that when you run the senate, but don't let the facts get in your way.

His nomination deserved a hearing. He didn't get it. They could have voted him down and satisfied you, but he deserved a hearing. There is no getting around that. Nobody is stupid enough to think it was right to deny a hearing because too close to election, but correct now, while the election is going on. You need to smell what you are shoveling.

He wasn't going to be confirmed no matter what.

I guess we will never know, since Moscow Mitch carried the water, will we?

GOOD

 

[Flash]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

 

[alang1216]

We have no reason to wait..........that is kinda like playing football and you are on the goal line saying lets give the ball back to them and not score a TD.

Your side wouldn't even hesitate..........so stop begging......you haven't attacked it because you can't have another Kav moment this close to the election.

What you're saying is 'might makes right'. If those are the rules don't complain when the Dems do things you don't like. Packing the court, eliminating the EC, adding states, etc., are Dem TDs.

 

[alang1216]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

 

[Polishprince]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

If the people think the New Green Deal, permanent Democrat hegemony is a tremendous idea, they'll vote for it next month.

The problem isn't whether the Democrats are going to admit DC, Puerto Rico and Haiti as states, open the borders and pack the courts.

The problem is that Sleepy Joe and the Hoe are failing to come clean about it BEFORE they people vote.

 

[Norman]

For those who do not know the threat to our democratic system of government, if our Supreme Court were to have its number of seats doubled in size and its new members arbitrarily filled by the leadership of an existing political party, Venezuela ought to serve as a chilling contemporary warning, and cause every freedom loving American voter to be fearful of “court packing”, and that means “court packing” by either political party!


In 2012, Hugo Chavez, the socialist president of Venezuela died, and was replaced by Chavez’s hand-picked, Nicolás Maduro. Soon thereafter, the Supreme Court that was “packed” with 12 new Justices loyal to President Hugo Chávez’s party, begins to neuter and destroy Venezuela’s democratic system of government. See: 2013: Maduro Challenged by Opposition Leader

“As Venezuela’s situation worsens, the Maduro regime arrests opposition political leaders and shuts down news websites and detains journalists, leading to criticism from the U.N. and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In 2017, Venezuela’s Supreme Court, filled with Maduro loyalists, take away the powers of the National Assembly, increasing Maduro’s control. The following year, he is reelected overwhelmingly in an election that a coalition of other western hemisphere nations says “lacked legitimacy.”

In another article dated, 2004, by Human Rights Watch, Venezuela: Chávez Allies Pack Supreme Court we find:

“Five years ago, President Chávez’s supporters helped to enshrine the principle of judicial independence in a new democratic constitution,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “Now, by packing the country’s highest court, they are betraying that principle and degrading Venezuelan democracy.”

And here we are today, with a Democrat Party Leadership controlled by “socialists”, refusing to tell voters if they intend to “pack” our Supreme Court, which most certainly would lead to a devastating assault on our democratic system of government, and reduce it to a Venezuelan type dictatorship, ruled by unelected Justices hand-picked by the Leadership of a socialist opposition political party.

Before you vote, I suggest you view the following video giving a glimpse into our future should our Supreme Court be packed by the Leadership of a political party.






Forewarned is forearmed! May God Bless the United States and her citizens.

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [our Supreme Court] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

I just don't give a shit, at my age I doubt very much either or is going to affect me.

"I just don't give a shit, at my age I doubt very much either or is going to affect me."

Chilling example of a Biden voter. Just don't give a damn what happens to the nation. As long as he gets his boomer loot everything is fine. Again, mistake in expanding the voting rights to these people.

Biden kneels for BLM, believes Antifa is an idea, is ready to defund the police. He is clearly in bed with the extremists.

 

[Flash]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

You are confused Moon Bat.

Republican Senators voted for those two dingbat yahoos that Obama nominated to the Supreme Court because as stupid and confused as they were they were "qualified" to serve on the court.

The highly qualified men that Trump nominated were voted along strict party lines. Barrett will be same way, just you wait and see.

Democrats are the scum of this country. We are getting a good dose of it now.

 

[alang1216]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

If the people think the New Green Deal, permanent Democrat hegemony is a tremendous idea, they'll vote for it next month.

The problem isn't whether the Democrats are going to admit DC, Puerto Rico and Haiti as states, open the borders and pack the courts.

The problem is that Sleepy Joe and the Hoe are failing to come clean about it BEFORE they people vote.

You may be giving the voters too much credit. Did they object when Mexico didn't pay for the wall or Trump didn't release his tax returns? How about when he didn't come out with a healthcare plan that we'd all love?

Alas, we get the government we deserve, not the one we want.

 

[alang1216]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

You are confused Moon Bat.

Republican Senators voted for those two dingbat yahoos that Obama nominated to the Supreme Court because as stupid and confused as they were they were "qualified" to serve on the court.

The highly qualified men that Trump nominated were voted along strict party lines. Barrett will be same way, just you wait and see.

Democrats are the scum of this country. We are getting a good dose of it now.

So why didn't they even vote on Garland but will vote on Barrett. Pretty scummy if you ask me.

 

[jknowgood]

For those who do not know the threat to our democratic system of government, if our Supreme Court were to have its number of seats doubled in size and its new members arbitrarily filled by the leadership of an existing political party, Venezuela ought to serve as a chilling contemporary warning, and cause every freedom loving American voter to be fearful of “court packing”, and that means “court packing” by either political party!


In 2012, Hugo Chavez, the socialist president of Venezuela died, and was replaced by Chavez’s hand-picked, Nicolás Maduro. Soon thereafter, the Supreme Court that was “packed” with 12 new Justices loyal to President Hugo Chávez’s party, begins to neuter and destroy Venezuela’s democratic system of government. See: 2013: Maduro Challenged by Opposition Leader

“As Venezuela’s situation worsens, the Maduro regime arrests opposition political leaders and shuts down news websites and detains journalists, leading to criticism from the U.N. and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In 2017, Venezuela’s Supreme Court, filled with Maduro loyalists, take away the powers of the National Assembly, increasing Maduro’s control. The following year, he is reelected overwhelmingly in an election that a coalition of other western hemisphere nations says “lacked legitimacy.”

In another article dated, 2004, by Human Rights Watch, Venezuela: Chávez Allies Pack Supreme Court we find:

“Five years ago, President Chávez’s supporters helped to enshrine the principle of judicial independence in a new democratic constitution,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “Now, by packing the country’s highest court, they are betraying that principle and degrading Venezuelan democracy.”

And here we are today, with a Democrat Party Leadership controlled by “socialists”, refusing to tell voters if they intend to “pack” our Supreme Court, which most certainly would lead to a devastating assault on our democratic system of government, and reduce it to a Venezuelan type dictatorship, ruled by unelected Justices hand-picked by the Leadership of a socialist opposition political party.

Before you vote, I suggest you view the following video giving a glimpse into our future should our Supreme Court be packed by the Leadership of a political party.






Forewarned is forearmed! May God Bless the United States and her citizens.

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [our Supreme Court] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Yes. I will still vote for Joe Biden even if he were to publicly state he would pack the court if trump pushes through confirmation without regard to election completion or outcome. Elections have consequences and so do tactics of the current duplicitous republicans to pack the court without regard for listening to the American People.

It’s his obligation to nominate somebody for the vacancy. Every president has done this

Just like it was Mitch's to his base, when he lied to say it was too close to the election to even consider the last president's nomination, and then closed the debate, only to reverse when in his bases favor. People do not forget duplicity. Bad tactics leave a sour aftertaste that does not go away.

Actually he said they wouldn't vote in Obama's pick, so there was no reason to have a vote on it. You can do that when you run the senate, but don't let the facts get in your way.

His nomination deserved a hearing. He didn't get it. They could have voted him down and satisfied you, but he deserved a hearing. There is no getting around that. Nobody is stupid enough to think it was right to deny a hearing because too close to election, but correct now, while the election is going on. You need to smell what you are shoveling.

He wasn't going to be confirmed no matter what.

I guess we will never know, since Moscow Mitch carried the water, will we?

It was a Republican controlled senate and they said no. Quit your crying.

 

[Polishprince]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

You are confused Moon Bat.

Republican Senators voted for those two dingbat yahoos that Obama nominated to the Supreme Court because as stupid and confused as they were they were "qualified" to serve on the court.

The highly qualified men that Trump nominated were voted along strict party lines. Barrett will be same way, just you wait and see.

Democrats are the scum of this country. We are getting a good dose of it now.

So why didn't they even vote on Garland but will vote on Barrett. Pretty scummy if you ask me.

How do you figure its "scummy" at all? Garland didn't have the votes to be confirmed, so little point in putting it up for a vote. BTW, Schumer and Dingy Hairy didn't give a lot of W's appointees an up or down vote either.

 

[alang1216]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.We'll

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

You are confused Moon Bat.

Republican Senators voted for those two dingbat yahoos that Obama nominated to the Supreme Court because as stupid and confused as they were they were "qualified" to serve on the court.

The highly qualified men that Trump nominated were voted along strict party lines. Barrett will be same way, just you wait and see.

Democrats are the scum of this country. We are getting a good dose of it now.

So why didn't they even vote on Garland but will vote on Barrett. Pretty scummy if you ask me.

How do you figure its "scummy" at all? Garland didn't have the votes to be confirmed, so little point in putting it up for a vote. BTW, Schumer and Dingy Hairy didn't give a lot of W's appointees an up or down vote either.

We'll never know about Garland, you just assume a straight party vote. What was the last time a SCOTUS nominee didn't get a vote?

 

[Polishprince]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.We'll

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

You are confused Moon Bat.

Republican Senators voted for those two dingbat yahoos that Obama nominated to the Supreme Court because as stupid and confused as they were they were "qualified" to serve on the court.

The highly qualified men that Trump nominated were voted along strict party lines. Barrett will be same way, just you wait and see.

Democrats are the scum of this country. We are getting a good dose of it now.

So why didn't they even vote on Garland but will vote on Barrett. Pretty scummy if you ask me.

How do you figure its "scummy" at all? Garland didn't have the votes to be confirmed, so little point in putting it up for a vote. BTW, Schumer and Dingy Hairy didn't give a lot of W's appointees an up or down vote either.

We'll never know about Garland, you just assume a straight party vote. What was the last time a SCOTUS nominee didn't get a vote?

In the 2007-08 Congress, Schumer pledged not to give a single Bush pick a vote, because he had the majority.

Schumer denied a lot of judges and others votes. He denied a vote to Liberal Ally John Bolton

 

[Flash]

The stupid hate filled Democrats would do it when they had power but would bitch about it when the Republicans would nominate Conservatives when they had power.

The Democrats want to make this country a socialist shithole and will do anything achieve that goal.

A Supreme Court with Constitutionists would be a hindrance to that agenda of destruction.

What a stupid, hate-filled post. I just hope the GOP doesn't bitch when the Dems pack the court, eliminate the EC, and add DC and PR as states.

You are confused Moon Bat.

Republican Senators voted for those two dingbat yahoos that Obama nominated to the Supreme Court because as stupid and confused as they were they were "qualified" to serve on the court.

The highly qualified men that Trump nominated were voted along strict party lines. Barrett will be same way, just you wait and see.

Democrats are the scum of this country. We are getting a good dose of it now.

So why didn't they even vote on Garland but will vote on Barrett. Pretty scummy if you ask me.

To ask that question you are once again showing your confusion Moon Bat.

The Senate controls the confirmation process. Obama didn't have a Democrat Senate. Earlier many of the Republicans voted to confirm two of the most idiotic Justices in the history of the court. They weren't about to let that worthless asshole Obama get another Libtard dipshit

If the Democrat filth was in charge of the Senate now Trump sure as hell would not get a confirmation hearing.

 

[Flash]

 

[lantern2814]

For those who do not know the threat to our democratic system of government, if our Supreme Court were to have its number of seats doubled in size and its new members arbitrarily filled by the leadership of an existing political party, Venezuela ought to serve as a chilling contemporary warning, and cause every freedom loving American voter to be fearful of “court packing”, and that means “court packing” by either political party!


In 2012, Hugo Chavez, the socialist president of Venezuela died, and was replaced by Chavez’s hand-picked, Nicolás Maduro. Soon thereafter, the Supreme Court that was “packed” with 12 new Justices loyal to President Hugo Chávez’s party, begins to neuter and destroy Venezuela’s democratic system of government. See: 2013: Maduro Challenged by Opposition Leader

“As Venezuela’s situation worsens, the Maduro regime arrests opposition political leaders and shuts down news websites and detains journalists, leading to criticism from the U.N. and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In 2017, Venezuela’s Supreme Court, filled with Maduro loyalists, take away the powers of the National Assembly, increasing Maduro’s control. The following year, he is reelected overwhelmingly in an election that a coalition of other western hemisphere nations says “lacked legitimacy.”

In another article dated, 2004, by Human Rights Watch, Venezuela: Chávez Allies Pack Supreme Court we find:

“Five years ago, President Chávez’s supporters helped to enshrine the principle of judicial independence in a new democratic constitution,” said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “Now, by packing the country’s highest court, they are betraying that principle and degrading Venezuelan democracy.”

And here we are today, with a Democrat Party Leadership controlled by “socialists”, refusing to tell voters if they intend to “pack” our Supreme Court, which most certainly would lead to a devastating assault on our democratic system of government, and reduce it to a Venezuelan type dictatorship, ruled by unelected Justices hand-picked by the Leadership of a socialist opposition political party.

Before you vote, I suggest you view the following video giving a glimpse into our future should our Supreme Court be packed by the Leadership of a political party.






Forewarned is forearmed! May God Bless the United States and her citizens.

JWK

”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [our Supreme Court] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47

Since the republicans have been cheating to pack the supreme court with far right radical extremists, I have absolutely no problem with Biden not cheating and expanding that court.

If you don't like it, too bad. You people shouldn't have cheated, lied and stole Supreme Court seats.

I hope he fills the court with far left liberals just to piss you off and I sure hope to see you lose it when he does.

Shut up you lying Communist fuck. Trump has done nothing illegal moron. I hope we see you totally lose it when Trump gets re-elected. I hope you’re miserable you Russian.

 

[johnwk]

.

This is freaken unreal!

Biden now says Voters ‘Don't Deserve’ To Know Whether I'll Pack The Court.
.


[video=youtube_share;ueO2KwKhPHk?t=9]
.

JWK

“Until you realize how easy it is for your mind to be manipulated, you remain the puppet of someone else’s game.” ― Evita Ochel
.

 

[alang1216]

If the Democrat filth was in charge of the Senate now Trump sure as hell would not get a confirmation hearing.

You're quite right, the Dems would honor the McConnell rule.

 

[johnwk]

I though everyone in the forum would appreciate President Trump’s speech given today at his "peaceful protest" for law and order.





JWK