S.J.
Platinum Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 37,666
- 7,628
Go ahead and try. Might as well go from a simple win for Trump in 2020 to a LANDSLIDE.IMPEACH!!!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go ahead and try. Might as well go from a simple win for Trump in 2020 to a LANDSLIDE.IMPEACH!!!!!!
Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
You stupid TDS afflicted Moon Bat.
Mueller didn't say a damn word about impeachment or anything else of note.
All he really said was "I'm outta here".
Why wouldn't he use the "I" word?he spelled out impeachment as the process, without using the ''I'' word.
Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
Exactly. He is not going to "recommend impeachment" explicitly. But he really can't spell it out anymore clearly.Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
You stupid TDS afflicted Moon Bat.
Mueller didn't say a damn word about impeachment or anything else of note.
All he really said was "I'm outta here".
he spelled out impeachment as the process, without using the ''I'' word.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday morning that in any testimony before Congress he would not provide information beyond what is already public about Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election or accusations of obstruction into his investigation by President Donald Trump. But in what could be a roadmap forward for Democrats, he noted that there is another procedure for charging a president of a crime.
That procedure is impeachment by Congress.
“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing," he said, without using the word "impeachment."
His comment came as part of his explanation about why charging the president with a crime was "not an option we could consider."
watch the full video of his comments at this link:
Mueller Points to How to Accuse a President of Wrongdoing
What's your thoughts on all this middle-of-the-roader?
Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
/—-/ We can’t clearly exonerate you from robbing the 7/11 in you neighborhood last week. So the local AG has no choice but to prosecute you.Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
Interpret what Mueller just stated through partisan lenses all you wish, BUT what Mueller clearly stated is that given the evidence contained and outlined in his report, Congress MUST conduct impeachment investigations and hearings.
Further, Mueller clearly stated that IF his investigation could clearly exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, then his report would have stated such.........basically, throwing Barr's "summary" (and Barr, the Trump stooge, himself) under the proverbial bus.
You stupid TDS afflicted Moon Bat.
Mueller didn't say a damn word about impeachment or anything else of note.
All he really said was "I'm outta here".
he spelled out impeachment as the process, without using the ''I'' word.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday morning that in any testimony before Congress he would not provide information beyond what is already public about Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election or accusations of obstruction into his investigation by President Donald Trump. But in what could be a roadmap forward for Democrats, he noted that there is another procedure for charging a president of a crime.
That procedure is impeachment by Congress.
“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing," he said, without using the word "impeachment."
His comment came as part of his explanation about why charging the president with a crime was "not an option we could consider."
watch the full video of his comments at this link:
Mueller Points to How to Accuse a President of Wrongdoing
Truth hurts the stupid left.^^I have the idiot and 72 other moronic liberals on ignore, so have to use your post to answer. These liberals have been lied to over and over
I did not have sexual relations with that woman.
You can keep your doctor.
You will save $2,500
At this point what difference does it make.
Wipe a hard drive with a cloth.
10,000 other lies I am not going to list.
Finally they get a president that is open and honest and the liberals have no clue what to do with him, except to yell "impeachment". The reason why I have most of them on ignore? Like Joe "the Groper" Biden was referred to by the "rocket man" Little Kim, low IQ(70 or below)..
Joe Biden's campaign responds to North Korea insults using Trump's words
Pathetic whataboutism
Rudy said that nothing changed from before. No charges possible, innocent until proven otherwise. No collusion, no obstruction, case closed.
the Constitution requires a "process other than the criminal justice system" to take disciplinary action against a sitting president.No, Nat, he did not call for impeachment. If the was recommending impeachment, he would have recommended impeachment. You heard what you wanted to hear.
Everyone knows that Trump is guilty of collusion and obstruction of justice. There isn't a single audiotape. Not one video tape. No notes, memos or phone transcripts. There isn't a witness. There is nothing that supports a finding of guilty. But its common knowledge.
Rudy said that nothing changed from before. No charges possible, innocent until proven otherwise. No collusion, no obstruction, case closed.
Gee, you took your head out of Trump's ass to write the above......You and Sarah HICKabee Sanders have a lot of comprehension issues.......LOL