Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh....I think he's lost enough--his base is with him to the bitter end. I'd not expect any less of them. They've put so much skin in the game..are so committed...that if he does lose...he will still be able to use them...and retain a lot of personal power.Much to your chagrin, Trump hasn't lost any voters.I imagine..most of the Trump voters would be OK with it now, right?The Old Guard Rs promised to do this last time until the Trump voters told them to say goodbye to their political careers.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
Your obsessive nature is quite dull.Oh....I think he's lost enough--his base is with him to the bitter end. I'd not expect any less of them. They've put so much skin in the game..are so committed...that if he does lose...he will still be able to use them...and retain a lot of personal power.Much to your chagrin, Trump hasn't lost any voters.I imagine..most of the Trump voters would be OK with it now, right?The Old Guard Rs promised to do this last time until the Trump voters told them to say goodbye to their political careers.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
My fantasy was more about him passing from the bug..and President Pence rallying the nation.
My obsessive nature..as you term it...has served me quite well throughout my life. I imagine it does look dull as shit--from the outside looking in...LOL!Your obsessive nature is quite dull.Oh....I think he's lost enough--his base is with him to the bitter end. I'd not expect any less of them. They've put so much skin in the game..are so committed...that if he does lose...he will still be able to use them...and retain a lot of personal power.Much to your chagrin, Trump hasn't lost any voters.I imagine..most of the Trump voters would be OK with it now, right?The Old Guard Rs promised to do this last time until the Trump voters told them to say goodbye to their political careers.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
My fantasy was more about him passing from the bug..and President Pence rallying the nation.
Since I deal with people from 5 different towns all day and 3 of those towns are hoods, I think I have a much better grasp of reality than most.
You may continue to fantasize if that's what helps you make it through the day.
We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
Your hatred of Trump simply reflects the fact that you are an alpha who can't tolerate other alphas.My obsessive nature..as you term it...has served me quite well throughout my life. I imagine it does look dull as shit--from the outside looking in...LOL!Your obsessive nature is quite dull.Oh....I think he's lost enough--his base is with him to the bitter end. I'd not expect any less of them. They've put so much skin in the game..are so committed...that if he does lose...he will still be able to use them...and retain a lot of personal power.Much to your chagrin, Trump hasn't lost any voters.I imagine..most of the Trump voters would be OK with it now, right?The Old Guard Rs promised to do this last time until the Trump voters told them to say goodbye to their political careers.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
My fantasy was more about him passing from the bug..and President Pence rallying the nation.
Since I deal with people from 5 different towns all day and 3 of those towns are hoods, I think I have a much better grasp of reality than most.
You may continue to fantasize if that's what helps you make it through the day.
Oh, and don't be silly..fantasy is how everyone makes it through the day~
If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
You do realize 2000 is a year right?..as in 'Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
2000?
You're an idiot.
You do realize 2000 is a year right?..as in 'Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
2000?
You're an idiot.
It's the year the Bush vs. Gore ruling gave back the states right to use their electors anyway they wanted. 'States' being the operative word for governor or legislature. The fear is that say..Biden wins Arizona by 100,000 votes but the states electors are instructed to give all their votes to Trump anyway.You do realize 2000 is a year right?..as in 'Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
2000?
You're an idiot.
Yes
Nothing to do with what you're talking about though.
It's the year the Bush vs. Gore ruling gave back the states right to use their electors anyway they wanted. 'States' being the operative word for governor or legislature. The fear is that say..Biden wins Arizona by 100,000 votes but the states electors are instructed to give all their votes to Trump anyway.You do realize 2000 is a year right?..as in 'Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
2000?
You're an idiot.
Yes
Nothing to do with what you're talking about though.
If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
The fear is that say..Biden wins Arizona by 100,000 votes but the states electors are instructed to give all their votes to Trump anyway.
I can't believe anyone still believes The Atlantic.Yayhoo!, citing Salon, citing the Atlantic.
Fake nooz via the Chinese telephone game.
Well, rational people don't.
We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
The point is why even have Trump and Biden on the ballot in those states since they can give Trump the states electors regardless of who wins..and your fine with that..I get it.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
So . . . you're outraged to discover that the laws are what they were written, rather than what you ASSumed and really, really, REALLY wished?
You leftists spend an awful lot of time being "outraged" by the "nefarious schemes" of working with the rules as they exist. And it's ridiculously hypocritical, given that your own leaders spend all their time trying to ignore or outright break the rules.
If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
It's the year the Bush vs. Gore ruling gave back the states right to use their electors anyway they wanted. 'States' being the operative word for governor or legislature. The fear is that say..Biden wins Arizona by 100,000 votes but the states electors are instructed to give all their votes to Trump anyway.You do realize 2000 is a year right?..as in 'Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
2000?
You're an idiot.
Yes
Nothing to do with what you're talking about though.
The point is why even have Trump and Biden on the ballot in those states since they can give Trump the states electors regardless of who wins..and your fine with that..I get it.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
So . . . you're outraged to discover that the laws are what they were written, rather than what you ASSumed and really, really, REALLY wished?
You leftists spend an awful lot of time being "outraged" by the "nefarious schemes" of working with the rules as they exist. And it's ridiculously hypocritical, given that your own leaders spend all their time trying to ignore or outright break the rules.
So we agree..your fine with a state ignoring its election results and just automatically giving Trump its electoral votes.The point is why even have Trump and Biden on the ballot in those states since they can give Trump the states electors regardless of who wins..and your fine with that..I get it.We are not talking about 'most states' we are talking six. Trump's people think their legislatures/governor can tell the electors to vote for Trump regardless of the outcome of the popular vote in that state, as per the 2000 SCOTUS ruling in Bush vs. Gore."Every state has allowed its voters to make the call in every election since the late 1800s. But in 2000, the Supreme Court held in Bush v. Gore that the states "can take back the power to appoint electors."...I think that means a republican controlled state can ignore the popular vote in that state if it goes Biden's way. Might as well not even have Trump and Biden on those state ballots.If Trump gets his way it will not matter who wins the popular vote in six key states, they will be obligated to have its electors vote for Trump...https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html
That is TOTALLY LEGAL under The United States Constitution.
Well, that'll teach you to try to think when you're obviously unequipped for it.
Most states have state laws requiring their electors to follow the popular vote for that state. And the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that electors do have to follow those laws if their state has them.
So . . . you're outraged to discover that the laws are what they were written, rather than what you ASSumed and really, really, REALLY wished?
You leftists spend an awful lot of time being "outraged" by the "nefarious schemes" of working with the rules as they exist. And it's ridiculously hypocritical, given that your own leaders spend all their time trying to ignore or outright break the rules.
No, the point is, that's how the Electoral College was set up from the start, and Arizona could have chosen to change it when the other 32 states did so. It didn't. So yeah, I'm fine with the people of Arizona making their own choices about their state's laws for themselves. And you're fine with taking that choice away from them because you've decided you know better. I get it.
