Yes, I'm a Conservative, But SOME Rent Control IS Necesary

[danielpalos]

capital Has to circulate not Labor in a First World economy.

Oh, God...he just keeps on spouting gibberish!

How do you get capital to "circulate", Daniel? Duh?

Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Oh, there's a "natural" rate of unemployment that you achieve through artificial manipulations of the minimum wage? Really, Daniel? That's total BULLSHIT, my ignorant little friend!

Fixing Standards for the Union, is an express power. There is no provision for excuses in the federal doctrine.

Ah, so the minimum wage is something given to us by the Constitution? In what part exactly, Daniel?

fixing Standards for the Union.

 

[Oldstyle]

Daniel is bringing a special kind of stupid to the board today.

right wingers are just story tellers; nobody takes them seriously.

Yeah, we're all story tellers, Daniel...but some of us are telling stories that are non fiction. You on the other hand seem to fall in the Juvenile Reader Science Fiction genre!

 

[WinterBorn]

Money is circulated because people proved something to get something.

Once again....

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

however did you get that idea?

we have a mixed market, command economy, and use fiat money.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

if you knew any Thing about economics, you would know that stabilizing our economy is key for Commerce.

Just because you have no money and others do does not destabilize our economy.

You made a claim. I am simply asking what we get for paying you? Because, if we get nothing we should not pay you.

solving simple poverty solves our market based problems. what Part of That, do you not get, right winger?

You are still dancing around the question. You could solve your poverty by getting a job.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Oh, there's a "natural" rate of unemployment that you achieve through artificial manipulations of the minimum wage? Really, Daniel? That's total BULLSHIT, my ignorant little friend!

Fixing Standards for the Union, is an express power. There is no provision for excuses in the federal doctrine.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

YOu made the claim, Daniel. YOu said "we get what we pay for". So why won't you answer the question?

Capitalism works. Who would be worse off with More rather than Less People spending more money.

Who could be worse off? They people who are taxed to pay you for doing nothing.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in commerce would be worse off?

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Compensate who? For what?

read the rest of the thread.

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel is bringing a special kind of stupid to the board today.

right wingers are just story tellers; nobody takes them seriously.

Yeah, we're all story tellers, Daniel...but some of us are telling stories that are non fiction. You on the other hand seem to fall in the Juvenile Reader Science Fiction genre!

you have to be sincere to establish confidence in your sincerity. it really is that simple. anyone with Any understanding of morals, knows that.

 

[Oldstyle]

Well, I've wasted enough of my life arguing with this idiot! I'm off to the golf course...

 

[WinterBorn]

Oh, there's a "natural" rate of unemployment that you achieve through artificial manipulations of the minimum wage? Really, Daniel? That's total BULLSHIT, my ignorant little friend!

Fixing Standards for the Union, is an express power. There is no provision for excuses in the federal doctrine.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

YOu made the claim, Daniel. YOu said "we get what we pay for". So why won't you answer the question?

Capitalism works. Who would be worse off with More rather than Less People spending more money.

Who could be worse off? They people who are taxed to pay you for doing nothing.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in commerce would be worse off?

Every merchant. The people who work would have less money to spend.

I see you are totally unable to answer my question. Why am I not surprised?

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

 

[WinterBorn]

Daniel is bringing a special kind of stupid to the board today.

right wingers are just story tellers; nobody takes them seriously.

Yeah, we're all story tellers, Daniel...but some of us are telling stories that are non fiction. You on the other hand seem to fall in the Juvenile Reader Science Fiction genre!

you have to be sincere to establish confidence in your sincerity. it really is that simple. anyone with Any understanding of morals, knows that.

I am sincere in my knowledge that you want us to pay you and get nothing in return.

 

[danielpalos]

however did you get that idea?

we have a mixed market, command economy, and use fiat money.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

if you knew any Thing about economics, you would know that stabilizing our economy is key for Commerce.

Just because you have no money and others do does not destabilize our economy.

You made a claim. I am simply asking what we get for paying you? Because, if we get nothing we should not pay you.

solving simple poverty solves our market based problems. what Part of That, do you not get, right winger?

You are still dancing around the question. You could solve your poverty by getting a job.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployed. i really can claim to be, naturally unemployed.

 

[danielpalos]

Fixing Standards for the Union, is an express power. There is no provision for excuses in the federal doctrine.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

YOu made the claim, Daniel. YOu said "we get what we pay for". So why won't you answer the question?

Capitalism works. Who would be worse off with More rather than Less People spending more money.

Who could be worse off? They people who are taxed to pay you for doing nothing.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in commerce would be worse off?

Every merchant. The people who work would have less money to spend.

I see you are totally unable to answer my question. Why am I not surprised?

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in Commerce would be worse off if every Customer should have an income?

Henry Ford gave us the answer.

 

[WinterBorn]

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

if you knew any Thing about economics, you would know that stabilizing our economy is key for Commerce.

Just because you have no money and others do does not destabilize our economy.

You made a claim. I am simply asking what we get for paying you? Because, if we get nothing we should not pay you.

solving simple poverty solves our market based problems. what Part of That, do you not get, right winger?

You are still dancing around the question. You could solve your poverty by getting a job.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployed. i really can claim to be, naturally unemployed.

Claim away. It changes nothing.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

 

[Oldstyle]

Daniel is bringing a special kind of stupid to the board today.

right wingers are just story tellers; nobody takes them seriously.

Yeah, we're all story tellers, Daniel...but some of us are telling stories that are non fiction. You on the other hand seem to fall in the Juvenile Reader Science Fiction genre!

you have to be sincere to establish confidence in your sincerity. it really is that simple. anyone with Any understanding of morals, knows that.

I'm sincerely confident that you don't have a clue what it is that you're talking about, Daniel!

 

[JWBooth]

Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Compensate who? For what?

read the rest of the thread.

I have and so far all I have seen is gibberish that wouldn't even clear an entry level leftist/collectivist economics class, much less a righteous one.
The whole discredited to each, from each notion is nonsense

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel is bringing a special kind of stupid to the board today.

right wingers are just story tellers; nobody takes them seriously.

Yeah, we're all story tellers, Daniel...but some of us are telling stories that are non fiction. You on the other hand seem to fall in the Juvenile Reader Science Fiction genre!

you have to be sincere to establish confidence in your sincerity. it really is that simple. anyone with Any understanding of morals, knows that.

I am sincere in my knowledge that you want us to pay you and get nothing in return.

that is immoral. our welfare clause is General not limited by Your selfishness.

 

[WinterBorn]

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

YOu made the claim, Daniel. YOu said "we get what we pay for". So why won't you answer the question?

Capitalism works. Who would be worse off with More rather than Less People spending more money.

Who could be worse off? They people who are taxed to pay you for doing nothing.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in commerce would be worse off?

Every merchant. The people who work would have less money to spend.

I see you are totally unable to answer my question. Why am I not surprised?

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in Commerce would be worse off if every Customer should have an income?

Henry Ford gave us the answer.

The customers will have less money. They will have it taken from them by force, and receive nothing in return for it. That is socialism.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

 

[danielpalos]

Daniel is bringing a special kind of stupid to the board today.

right wingers are just story tellers; nobody takes them seriously.

Yeah, we're all story tellers, Daniel...but some of us are telling stories that are non fiction. You on the other hand seem to fall in the Juvenile Reader Science Fiction genre!

you have to be sincere to establish confidence in your sincerity. it really is that simple. anyone with Any understanding of morals, knows that.

I'm sincerely confident that you don't have a clue what it is that you're talking about, Daniel!

i am sincerely confident you don't understand economics to have nothing but fallacy instead of a good argument.

 

[danielpalos]

Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment.

Compensate who? For what?

read the rest of the thread.

I have and so far all I have seen is gibberish that wouldn't even clear an entry level leftist/collectivist economics class, much less a righteous one.
The whole discredited to each, from each notion is nonsense

i gainsay your contention.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism works. Who would be worse off with More rather than Less People spending more money.

Who could be worse off? They people who are taxed to pay you for doing nothing.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in commerce would be worse off?

Every merchant. The people who work would have less money to spend.

I see you are totally unable to answer my question. Why am I not surprised?

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

What merchant in Commerce would be worse off if every Customer should have an income?

Henry Ford gave us the answer.

The customers will have less money. They will have it taken from them by force, and receive nothing in return for it. That is socialism.

And what do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you a salary for doing nothing? YOu made the claim "we get what we pay for in the first world, too", so answer the question. What do we, the taxpayers, get for paying you?

fourteen or fifteen dollars an hour equivalent. show your numbers, right winger.

How will any Merchant in Commerce be Worse off if every adult customer has an income?

Anyone with Any understanding of microeconomics want to explain the concept.

 

[WinterBorn]

Daniel is bringing a special kind of stupid to the board today.

right wingers are just story tellers; nobody takes them seriously.

Yeah, we're all story tellers, Daniel...but some of us are telling stories that are non fiction. You on the other hand seem to fall in the Juvenile Reader Science Fiction genre!

you have to be sincere to establish confidence in your sincerity. it really is that simple. anyone with Any understanding of morals, knows that.

I am sincere in my knowledge that you want us to pay you and get nothing in return.

that is immoral. our welfare clause is General not limited by Your selfishness.

LMAO!!!! Immoral?? You want to live off of others, while offering nothing in return. And you call me selfish? I provide something for the money I get. I have asked and asked and asked what you provide for the money you want, and you have no answer.

You want to be given money for doing nothing. That money comes from people who work. And you have the audacity to call me selfish? LMAO!!

And as for immoral, it is not immoral at all. If you will not lift a finger to take care of yourself, why should anyone else?