Yet another blatant Trump hypocrisy that will go unnoticed by Trumpsters......

I asked for an OUNCE of objectivity from right wingers, and...APPARENTLY......not an ounce exists.

Let me ask even more simply for the simple minded conservatives:

Were the Wikileaks exposures acceptable to republicans? ..........Yes or No?

Are the current leaks exposing the seditious acts of the Trump administration acceptable? ...Yes or No?

You're comparing apples and oranges. You are talking about leaks from a private organization (the DNC) and leaks from the government.

One is clearly illegal.

But you are also ignoring the point.

You want to ignore the substance of one and complain about the leaks. But the leaks that are actually illegal, you don't care about and want to focus on the substance

Meanwhile trump has dealt with the substance of both and is seeking to fix the illegal leaks.

The hypocrisy here is purely yours.
 
No, you look to the wrong places for answers to the questions you ask.
Of course, you really need to be asking Sanders supporters that question.
I asked for an OUNCE of objectivity from right wingers, and...APPARENTLY......not an ounce exists.

Let me ask even more simply for the simple minded conservatives:

Were the Wikileaks exposures acceptable to republicans? ..........Yes or No?

Are the current leaks exposing the seditious acts of the Trump administration acceptable? ...Yes or No?


In other words, you simply dodge the questions......Fine, I understand.
 
No, you look to the wrong places for answers to the questions you ask.


How true........Looking at this forum for honest, objective and half-way smart conservatives on this forum, IS looking at the wrong place.
 
You're comparing apples and oranges. You are talking about leaks from a private organization (the DNC) and leaks from the government.


Add stupidity of fruits to your long list of stupid comments.....

So, the DNC is to blame for "leaks" to Wikileaks???....Should we disregard 17 or 18 U.S. intelligence agencies that place the blame on the Russians?...The fact that the Russians did not reveal any of their hacking of the RNC causes NO eyebrows to go up?
 
If there is an ounce of objectivity among the Trumpsters on here, follow this bit of logic......

Trump and his brainwashed GOPers in congress are calling for investigations on the intelligence communities LEAKS, but NOT the essence of what those leaks reveal; basically stating, "we CANNOT allow the truth to come out into the open...."

Now, compare the above with this "rationale" had the anti-Trump contingency had stated this:

"We should completely DISREGARD what is coming out of Wikileaks and, instead, concentrate on placing a gag on Assange and his leaks obtained from Russia"........

Always remember how MUCH the orange clown expressed his LOVE of Wikileaks...
Your daily cry fest is getting old. This is not going to turn out the way you hope. It will end with the purge of traitors that are releasing half assed reports that include top secret info. That is completely different than stupid democrats that fall for simple phishing scams on non-governmental systems.
 
You're comparing apples and oranges. You are talking about leaks from a private organization (the DNC) and leaks from the government.


Add stupidity of fruits to your long list of stupid comments.....

So, the DNC is to blame for "leaks" to Wikileaks???....Should we disregard 17 or 18 U.S. intelligence agencies that place the blame on the Russians?...The fact that the Russians did not reveal any of their hacking of the RNC causes NO eyebrows to go up?

I can't take you seriously if you aren't even paying attention to what I'm saying
 
You're comparing apples and oranges. You are talking about leaks from a private organization (the DNC) and leaks from the government.


Add stupidity of fruits to your long list of stupid comments.....

So, the DNC is to blame for "leaks" to Wikileaks???....Should we disregard 17 or 18 U.S. intelligence agencies that place the blame on the Russians?...The fact that the Russians did not reveal any of their hacking of the RNC causes NO eyebrows to go up?
The only GOP material that was hacked was very old info. Meanwhile the FBI told the Dems they were hacked and offered to help. The Dems told them no, because they are jackasses.
 
Your daily cry fest is getting old. This is not going to turn out the way you hope. It will end with the purge of traitors that are releasing half assed reports that include top secret info.


Why, thank you there, Blondie.........and yet, here you are, bitching that I'm involved in a "cry fest" because I try to hold up a mirror to scum buckets.......BTW, "top secret info." has been released????
Shouldn't you then be hiding under your bed?
 
No, you look to the wrong places for answers to the questions you ask.


How true........Looking at this forum for honest, objective and half-way smart conservatives on this forum, IS looking at the wrong place.
Yes, well like you, the pot, calling the kettle black. None of you have a clue what Trump is doing, none of you had a clue what Obama did until proof his deeds came out. Aand yet you play these pretend games like you are in a position to know what goes on and comment or make demands on it. What you need instead of an answer about wiki leaks is a year in an insane asylum.
 
If you can't trust the people who keep the secrets to keep a freaking secret where do you go for "intelligence" analysis? If it wasn't for the criminal enterprise in the MSM covering their asses, most of the drones in the "intelligence community" should have been indicted for criminal negligence after 9-11. Even a NY Times editorial suggested that jihadists could fly a suicide mission into a target in the U.S. The freaking FBI couldn't find two Russian terrorists in Boston before they set a bomb off at the Marathon, they dropped the investigation on the terrorist just before he murdered almost 50 people in a Fla nightclub and they still can't unlock the San Bernardino terrorist cell phones more than a freaking year after the act but they have the time to illegally tap phones and leak it to the press.
 
Your daily cry fest is getting old. This is not going to turn out the way you hope. It will end with the purge of traitors that are releasing half assed reports that include top secret info.


Why, thank you there, Blondie.........and yet, here you are, bitching that I'm involved in a "cry fest" because I try to hold up a mirror to scum buckets.......BTW, "top secret info." has been released????
Shouldn't you then be hiding under your bed?
Keep crying. It is entertaining.

There are generally four areas that an executive branch claim of privilege is based: 1) presidential communications privilege; 2) deliberative process privilege; 3) national security, foreign relations or military affairs, and 4) an ongoing law enforcement investigation. - See more at: The Constitution and Executive Privilege - Online Library of Law & Liberty
 
If you can't trust the people who keep the secrets to keep a freaking secret where do you go for "intelligence" analysis? If it wasn't for the criminal enterprise in the MSM covering their asses, most of the drones in the "intelligence community" should have been indicted for criminal negligence after 9-11. Even a NY Times editorial suggested that jihadists could fly a suicide mission into a target in the U.S. The freaking FBI couldn't find two Russian terrorists in Boston before they set a bomb off at the Marathon, they dropped the investigation on the terrorist just before he murdered almost 50 people in a Fla nightclub and they still can't unlock the San Bernardino terrorist cell phones more than a freaking year after the act but they have the time to illegally tap phones and leak it to the press.
The security community allowed Dems to hire a Muslim spy ring, with criminal convictions, to run the IT systems of the Democrat leadership. Not their best work. I'm amazed that MSM has ignored that story.
 
Keep crying. It is entertaining.

There are generally four areas that an executive branch claim of privilege is based: 1) presidential communications privilege; 2) deliberative process privilege; 3) national security, foreign relations or military affairs, and 4) an ongoing law enforcement investigation. - See more at: The Constitution and Executive Privilege - Online Library of Law & Liberty


Oh....wait, you forgot that the above is ONLY applicable is its a white guy doing it......LOL
 
Keep crying. It is entertaining.

There are generally four areas that an executive branch claim of privilege is based: 1) presidential communications privilege; 2) deliberative process privilege; 3) national security, foreign relations or military affairs, and 4) an ongoing law enforcement investigation. - See more at: The Constitution and Executive Privilege - Online Library of Law & Liberty


Oh....wait, you forgot that the above is ONLY applicable is its a white guy doing it......LOL
Whatever racist pig.
 
If there is an ounce of objectivity among the Trumpsters on here, follow this bit of logic......

Trump and his brainwashed GOPers in congress are calling for investigations on the intelligence communities LEAKS, but NOT the essence of what those leaks reveal; basically stating, "we CANNOT allow the truth to come out into the open...."

Now, compare the above with this "rationale" had the anti-Trump contingency had stated this:

"We should completely DISREGARD what is coming out of Wikileaks and, instead, concentrate on placing a gag on Assange and his leaks obtained from Russia"........

Always remember how MUCH the orange clown expressed his LOVE of Wikileaks...
Is there a reason you did not post the opposing/lefts "rationale" in both those cases?
 
The security community allowed Dems to hire a Muslim spy ring, with criminal convictions, to run the IT systems of the Democrat leadership. Not their best work. I'm amazed that MSM has ignored that story.


How true....again......this is one of the many reasons that we come here to learn from fuckheads like you....Was it Levin or Breitbart or Hannity who has revealed such gems......LOL
 
The security community allowed Dems to hire a Muslim spy ring, with criminal convictions, to run the IT systems of the Democrat leadership. Not their best work. I'm amazed that MSM has ignored that story.


How true....again......this is one of the many reasons that we come here to learn from fuckheads like you....Was it Levin or Breitbart or Hannity who has revealed such gems......LOL
Actually it was the government when they fired the Muslim spies you idiots hired.
 
Last edited:
Actually it was the government when they arrested the Muslim spies you idiots hired.


Isn't it amazing how "dumb" Muslim spies can be??? Here they sabotaged the DNC to help Trump...
Simply AMAZING these Muslims' "love" for Trump.....LOL
 
And, if someone studies it deeply, it is found to be Democratic Presidential policies put in place that made it near impossible for the agencies to interact with important information, as well as being forbidden to research online social media of suspects (think Obama)
If you can't trust the people who keep the secrets to keep a freaking secret where do you go for "intelligence" analysis? If it wasn't for the criminal enterprise in the MSM covering their asses, most of the drones in the "intelligence community" should have been indicted for criminal negligence after 9-11. Even a NY Times editorial suggested that jihadists could fly a suicide mission into a target in the U.S. The freaking FBI couldn't find two Russian terrorists in Boston before they set a bomb off at the Marathon, they dropped the investigation on the terrorist just before he murdered almost 50 people in a Fla nightclub and they still can't unlock the San Bernardino terrorist cell phones more than a freaking year after the act but they have the time to illegally tap phones and leak it to the press.
 
Actually it was the government when they arrested the Muslim spies you idiots hired.


Isn't it amazing how "dumb" Muslim spies can be??? Here they sabotaged the DNC to help Trump...
Simply AMAZING these Muslims' "love" for Trump.....LOL
You are completely clueless. The downloaded select intelligence committee info to external servers. How does that help Trump?
 

Forum List

Back
Top