Derelict_Drvr
Gold Member
- Nov 11, 2016
- 1,115
- 205
- 140
I don't know what GLSEN is, and if it was a prominent left wing group, I probably would. I suspect you are trying to say that gay and lesbians are all pedophiles. That's just nuts. You can do what ever you want to with your knowledge. It's proven to be severely defective every time so far, and I have no reason to believe there has been any change recently.
Google GLSEN...........and then get back to me............
Oh Snap! Good shot!
That's a mortal wound there, BULLDOG!!!!
If you say so. The claim was that the left supported pedophilia. How does a gay and lesbian group have anything to do with that?I don't know what GLSEN is, and if it was a prominent left wing group, I probably would. I suspect you are trying to say that gay and lesbians are all pedophiles. That's just nuts. You can do what ever you want to with your knowledge. It's proven to be severely defective every time so far, and I have no reason to believe there has been any change recently.
Google GLSEN...........and then get back to me............
Oh Snap! Good shot!
That's a mortal wound there, BULLDOG!!!!
If you say so. The claim was that the left supported pedophilia. How does a gay and lesbian group have anything to do with that?
Are you serious? If you think a Gay and Lesbian ADVOCACY group trying to entice kindergarten children into experimenting with homosexuality could possibly be Conservative, you are farther gone than I thought.
As for your questioning support, The vast majority of homosexuals are on the Left. The left does support the LGBTQ platform, so by extension they support GLSEN's advocacy efforts. So, if the GLSEN is committing Pedophilia By Proxy, the left is supporting Pedophilia.
See how easily and logically it all ties together?
Now we're getting somewhere. How about proof that they are advocating pedophilia. Pointing out some psychiatrists discussing pedophilia is not the proof you need to prove your point.
What I presented is called Circumstantial Evidence, which posits a plausible account of events. Many a criminal has been convicted in a court of law with it.
Now you're the defense. You need to present a plausible defense to convince the jury I am wrong.
According to your testimony so far, that should be easy.