You have to wonder how Trump supporters justify the senate blocking new witnesses

[Carl in Michigan]

How in the fuck do you justify calling for his impeachment before the man was even sworn into office you leftwing nazi mental cases

That's moronically broadcasting to the world your political party plans on committing sedition and treason for however long it takes to affect a political coup against the newly elected President.

....4 years.....and counting?

Trump really should have a third term -- and keep adding another until Dims accept America's president

 

[LeftofLeft]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

If witnesses were so important, the House would have had them. From both sides.

 

[Mike473]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963

Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.

LOL

If they had a real spine it would have been an immediate vote for dismissal the day it arrived.........But a few RINOs are still around for ya...........HEY.......You got Romney and Collins..........couldn't get the others in an election year huh...........

Let's take a look again at the evidence.

With Romney, it is a personal issue with Trump and has nothing to do with this trial. The Liberals went so far as to claim he tied his dog to the top of his car and drove cross country, and he couldn't muster a spine to defend himself. Yet, he holds a grudge against Trump for simply pointing out he choked the 2012 election. Romney is acting tough now, only it is 8 years too late.

On Collins, I am betting Mitch told her he had the votes and could vote the way she did to protect her seat.

Bottom line, they all knew this was a joke and dealt with it appropriately.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[eagle1462010]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963

Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.

LOL

If they had a real spine it would have been an immediate vote for dismissal the day it arrived.........But a few RINOs are still around for ya...........HEY.......You got Romney and Collins..........couldn't get the others in an election year huh...........

Let's take a look again at the evidence.

With Romney, it is a personal issue with Trump and has nothing to do with this trial. The Liberals went so far as to claim he tied his dog to the top of his car and drove cross country, and he couldn't muster a spine to defend himself. Yet, he holds a grudge against Trump for simply pointing out he choked the 2012 election. Romney is acting tough now, only it is 8 years too late.

On Collins, I am betting Mitch told her he had the votes and could vote the way she did to protect her seat.

Bottom line, they all knew this was a joke and dealt with it appropriately.

They are both still RINOs.................and know this was a political hit............They should have voted with everyone else.........

Romney should have fought back..........YUP..........he didn't and lost..........now he's ticked that someone who is in office knows how to hit the Dems where it hurts.

 

[Mike473]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963

Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.

LOL

If they had a real spine it would have been an immediate vote for dismissal the day it arrived.........But a few RINOs are still around for ya...........HEY.......You got Romney and Collins..........couldn't get the others in an election year huh...........

Let's take a look again at the evidence.

With Romney, it is a personal issue with Trump and has nothing to do with this trial. The Liberals went so far as to claim he tied his dog to the top of his car and drove cross country, and he couldn't muster a spine to defend himself. Yet, he holds a grudge against Trump for simply pointing out he choked the 2012 election. Romney is acting tough now, only it is 8 years too late.

On Collins, I am betting Mitch told her he had the votes and could vote the way she did to protect her seat.

Bottom line, they all knew this was a joke and dealt with it appropriately.

They are both still RINOs.................and know this was a political hit............They should have voted with everyone else.........

Romney should have fought back..........YUP..........he didn't and lost..........now he's ticked that someone who is in office knows how to hit the Dems where it hurts.

Romney is now despised by both Liberals and Conservatives alike. He has the worst instincts of any national level politician I have ever seen.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No need to justify anything. The case devised by the House Democrats was presented. They lost due to lack of evidence.

 

[eagle1462010]

I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963

Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.

LOL

If they had a real spine it would have been an immediate vote for dismissal the day it arrived.........But a few RINOs are still around for ya...........HEY.......You got Romney and Collins..........couldn't get the others in an election year huh...........

Let's take a look again at the evidence.

With Romney, it is a personal issue with Trump and has nothing to do with this trial. The Liberals went so far as to claim he tied his dog to the top of his car and drove cross country, and he couldn't muster a spine to defend himself. Yet, he holds a grudge against Trump for simply pointing out he choked the 2012 election. Romney is acting tough now, only it is 8 years too late.

On Collins, I am betting Mitch told her he had the votes and could vote the way she did to protect her seat.

Bottom line, they all knew this was a joke and dealt with it appropriately.

They are both still RINOs.................and know this was a political hit............They should have voted with everyone else.........

Romney should have fought back..........YUP..........he didn't and lost..........now he's ticked that someone who is in office knows how to hit the Dems where it hurts.

Romney is now despised by both Liberals and Conservatives alike. He has the worst instincts of any national level politician I have ever seen.

We need to throw his sorry butt out of office.....................Tea Party RINO Hunt style.........

Or he just needs to join his dang buddies on the left...he isn't a Republican.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963

Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.

LOL

If they had a real spine it would have been an immediate vote for dismissal the day it arrived.........But a few RINOs are still around for ya...........HEY.......You got Romney and Collins..........couldn't get the others in an election year huh...........

Let's take a look again at the evidence.

With Romney, it is a personal issue with Trump and has nothing to do with this trial. The Liberals went so far as to claim he tied his dog to the top of his car and drove cross country, and he couldn't muster a spine to defend himself. Yet, he holds a grudge against Trump for simply pointing out he choked the 2012 election. Romney is acting tough now, only it is 8 years too late.

On Collins, I am betting Mitch told her he had the votes and could vote the way she did to protect her seat.

Bottom line, they all knew this was a joke and dealt with it appropriately.

They are both still RINOs.................and know this was a political hit............They should have voted with everyone else.........

Romney should have fought back..........YUP..........he didn't and lost..........now he's ticked that someone who is in office knows how to hit the Dems where it hurts.

Romney is now despised by both Liberals and Conservatives alike. He has the worst instincts of any national level politician I have ever seen.

That Candy Crowley gave him a real shiner. All he did was slump his shoulders, even though as was reported in the MSM the next day, he was right.

Hopefully the Republicans have learned with McCain and Romney never to give the nom to someone because it's "their turn".

 

[Lysistrata]

Only snowflakes wonder why the Senate would not allow the House Democrat's to use the Senate Impeachment hearing to keep digging / looking for evidence of a crime they did not have, not even when they voted to Impeach the President, especially after:

- Pelosi attempted to force the a Senate to comply with her demands on how the Senate hearings shod be run...

- The Democrats demanded the Senate hold a 'fair trial', something they refused to run in the House while justifying doing so by declaring they did not have to because this was a POLITICAL Impeachment...

- The Democrats marched into the Senate, declared they were unprepared to present their case for Impeachment hung the President, then declaring the SENATE was IN TRIAL

ONLY SNOWFLAKES would believe the Founding Fathers created Impeachment as a political weapon for elitist would-be rulers to use to strip the nation of their democratically-elected leader, to remove the PEOPLE'S CHOICE of President, stripping the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leader.

'Brainwash Complete'


.

Dingbat, don't you know the difference between an investigation, which, in this case, was an investigation into whether there was evidence to support the drafting of articles of impeachment, an investigation in which trump and members of his administration were invited to participate, and a trial, which only can be held by the Senate? No trials can be held by the House, so any assertion that the House refused "a fair trial" is fantastical bullshit. Under the Constitution, the House passes articles of impeachment and then refers the matter to the Senate for a trial. The House impeachment managers never declared that they were unprepared to present a case.

Do investigations "dig" for evidence? That's what they are intended to do. What you are demanding is that the suspect and his lawyer be present and be allowed to challenge the witness every time the cops interview a witness. This is not how investigations are conducted.

The fault lies entirely in the Senate, which refused to hear the evidence in conducting the trial. You can't blame any "snowflakes" for this dereliction of duty by the senators, their violation of their oaths, and their open display of disdain for the people of the U.S.A.

Why don't you familiarize yourself with the facts before mouthing off.

You're an idiot, you know that, Common Core?

The Senate Impeachment hearing was NOT an investigation. It was the 'trial'.

The House violated the Constitution by not holding a House vote to begin Impeachment investigations...but they investigated....and cane up with NO crime, NO evidence, and NO WITNESSES...but Impeached the President anyway.

They then matched their case to the Senate...but were not ready to present their case on which they voted to Impeach the President - they could not justify doing so.

Instead they declared it was a political Impeachment, declared the Senate was on trial, and declared if the Senate did not agree with their admitted partisan Impeachment then the Senate was 'guilty' too....

...and then they LOST.

And all snowflakes can do now is parrot the talking points of treasonous losers.

Like I said, the Senate holds the trial. The House only investigates as to whether one is warranted.

The House was never required to hold a vote to begin an investigation. The ensuing investigations did come up with evidence of a crime and witnesses, resulting in the drafting of articles of impeachment The House impeachment managers were ready to present their case. Obviously, they all arrived in the Senate chamber.

The republicans are at fault in not allowing a proper trial to occur. They have not given any coherent explanation of why. The republicans in the Senate were too cowardly to allow relevant evidence to be presented. In doing so, they violated their oath.

Lay it all out on the table. Let all witnesses be heard and all documents revealed on the floor of the Senate chamber, where all of the American People can review it. It has been trump who has refused to let his witnesses testify. trump himself should be questioned under oath.

The book about the republican senators will be entitled "Profiles in Cowardice."

An acquittal under these circumstances means nothing.

 

[Terri4Trump]

I can prove how corrupt Democrats are right now; PROVE IT I say, prove it.

Bill Clinton committed perjury wile under oath. That is a FACT, and its not even up for debate. Under oath, he committed the crime of perjury, on camera, for all to see. There are many people in federal prison right now for that crime, and Clinton was even disbarred for it soon after.

And yet, when it came to vote at his impeachment trial, all Democrat Senators voted not guilty. THAT is corruption.

When you are a juror, and you know for an absolute, uncontested fact that the accused in front of you is guilty, and yet you vote to acquit, you are as corrupt as it comes.

That's it. Period. I never want to hear another word from these fascist Democrat vermin who tried to overthrow our government. They lied, they falsely accused the president, and they are as corrupt as the day is long. Democrats are the enemy of our nation and they must be destroyed, utterly.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

If they didn't have enough witnesses why did they vote to impeach in the first place?

 

[Billy000]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

If they didn't have enough witnesses why did they vote to impeach in the first place?

Talk about a defeatist attitude. They had to hold him accountable somehow. They had to make an effort.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Only snowflakes wonder why the Senate would not allow the House Democrat's to use the Senate Impeachment hearing to keep digging / looking for evidence of a crime they did not have, not even when they voted to Impeach the President, especially after:

- Pelosi attempted to force the a Senate to comply with her demands on how the Senate hearings shod be run...

- The Democrats demanded the Senate hold a 'fair trial', something they refused to run in the House while justifying doing so by declaring they did not have to because this was a POLITICAL Impeachment...

- The Democrats marched into the Senate, declared they were unprepared to present their case for Impeachment hung the President, then declaring the SENATE was IN TRIAL

ONLY SNOWFLAKES would believe the Founding Fathers created Impeachment as a political weapon for elitist would-be rulers to use to strip the nation of their democratically-elected leader, to remove the PEOPLE'S CHOICE of President, stripping the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leader.

'Brainwash Complete'


.

Dingbat, don't you know the difference between an investigation, which, in this case, was an investigation into whether there was evidence to support the drafting of articles of impeachment, an investigation in which trump and members of his administration were invited to participate, and a trial, which only can be held by the Senate? No trials can be held by the House, so any assertion that the House refused "a fair trial" is fantastical bullshit. Under the Constitution, the House passes articles of impeachment and then refers the matter to the Senate for a trial. The House impeachment managers never declared that they were unprepared to present a case.

Do investigations "dig" for evidence? That's what they are intended to do. What you are demanding is that the suspect and his lawyer be present and be allowed to challenge the witness every time the cops interview a witness. This is not how investigations are conducted.

The fault lies entirely in the Senate, which refused to hear the evidence in conducting the trial. You can't blame any "snowflakes" for this dereliction of duty by the senators, their violation of their oaths, and their open display of disdain for the people of the U.S.A.

Why don't you familiarize yourself with the facts before mouthing off.

You're an idiot, you know that, Common Core?

The Senate Impeachment hearing was NOT an investigation. It was the 'trial'.

The House violated the Constitution by not holding a House vote to begin Impeachment investigations...but they investigated....and cane up with NO crime, NO evidence, and NO WITNESSES...but Impeached the President anyway.

They then matched their case to the Senate...but were not ready to present their case on which they voted to Impeach the President - they could not justify doing so.

Instead they declared it was a political Impeachment, declared the Senate was on trial, and declared if the Senate did not agree with their admitted partisan Impeachment then the Senate was 'guilty' too....

...and then they LOST.

And all snowflakes can do now is parrot the talking points of treasonous losers.

Like I said, the Senate holds the trial. The House only investigates as to whether one is warranted.

The House was never required to hold a vote to begin an investigation. The ensuing investigations did come up with evidence of a crime and witnesses, resulting in the drafting of articles of impeachment The House impeachment managers were ready to present their case. Obviously, they all arrived in the Senate chamber.

The republicans are at fault in not allowing a proper trial to occur. They have not given any coherent explanation of why. The republicans in the Senate were too cowardly to allow relevant evidence to be presented. In doing so, they violated their oath.

Lay it all out on the table. Let all witnesses be heard and all documents revealed on the floor of the Senate chamber, where all of the American People can review it. It has been trump who has refused to let his witnesses testify. trump himself should be questioned under oath.

The book about the republican senators will be entitled "Profiles in Cowardice."

An acquittal under these circumstances means nothing.

It means he's acquitted.

 

[MaryL]

Blowback. When the dust settles, and people come to their senses, perhaps the Justice department should put the house impeachment committee under close scrutiny. Yeah, and look into every single nook and cranny, every closet, every single financial or political dealings they've done in their careers. When the shoe is on the other foot, we will see how lilly white and pure THEY are. Have a nice day.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

If they didn't have enough witnesses why did they vote to impeach in the first place?

Talk about a defeatist attitude. They had to hold him accountable somehow. They had to make an effort.

Accountable for what? Impeachment is not something to be taken lightly, which is why it's only been done two times prior in 250 years. You guys have been acting like rotten little crybabies screaming for impeachment literally after the day this man got elected simply because you don't like him. You rushed through an impeachment based solely on hearsay and then have the nerve to scream and cry some more when the "grown ups" in the Senate won't play your game. It's embarrassing. The House Democrats are a bunch of degenerates and Adam Schiff should be tarred and feathered and run out of town for the disgrace he's brought to our government.

 

[Nostra]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

How many new witnesses were called during the Clinton trial?

ZERO sound about right?

The Dimwinger Butthurt over yet another loss if hilarious.

All during the Senate trail:

Over three days, February 1–3, House managers took videotaped closed-door depositions from Monica Lewinsky, Clinton's friend Vernon Jordan, and White House aide Sidney Blumenthal. On February 4, however, the Senate voted 70–30 that excerpting these videotapes would suffice as testimony, rather than calling live witnesses to appear at trial. The videos were played in the Senate on February 6, featuring 30 excerpts of Lewinsky discussing her affidavit in the Paula Jones case, the hiding of small gifts Clinton had given her, and his involvement in procurement of a job for Lewinsky.
Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia

Never has a Senate trial not included witnesses, and tramp obstruction of everything is admitting his guilt.

Hey Dumbfuck, all 3 of those had already provided testimony. They were called in to clarify that earlier testimony. They did so behind closed doors, and the Dimwingers in charge decided what to make public.

Not a single new witness testified during the Clinton trial, ya blithering idiot. Please try to keep up.

YOUR House Clowns had 13 witnesses testify, Moron.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

Look, clearly you haven’t figured out what this entire impeachment process is. It is political war.

The democrats started the war. They really never thought they could remove Trump, but they hoped to damage him enough to win the Presidency in 2020. So they started their impeachment investigation, gathered all the evidence they could, came up with very little, and sent the whole mess to the Senate in a 100% PARTISAN VOTE.

The senate is controlled by the other warring party, so the Dems were fighting on enemy territory and at a disadvantage. Their hope was to bring witnesses forward to embarrass and damage Trump, but they failed to put on a strong enough case that would encourage enough republicans to break ranks. Although they did get 2, so the “no witnesses” vote was not as completely partisan as the house impeachment vote.

 

[blackhawk]

What one has to wonder is why the House Democrats didn't subpoena all the people they wanted testify before sending the articles to Senate.The Trump claimed or would claim executive privilige excuse for not doing so does not hold up as they could have gone to the courts for a ruling and requested an expedited ruling. What one truly has to wonder is why is the left is not upset with Schiff, Nadler and the Hose Democrats for doing such a shitty job on the impeachment articles they sent to the Senate.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Only snowflakes wonder why the Senate would not allow the House Democrat's to use the Senate Impeachment hearing to keep digging / looking for evidence of a crime they did not have, not even when they voted to Impeach the President, especially after:

- Pelosi attempted to force the a Senate to comply with her demands on how the Senate hearings shod be run...

- The Democrats demanded the Senate hold a 'fair trial', something they refused to run in the House while justifying doing so by declaring they did not have to because this was a POLITICAL Impeachment...

- The Democrats marched into the Senate, declared they were unprepared to present their case for Impeachment hung the President, then declaring the SENATE was IN TRIAL

ONLY SNOWFLAKES would believe the Founding Fathers created Impeachment as a political weapon for elitist would-be rulers to use to strip the nation of their democratically-elected leader, to remove the PEOPLE'S CHOICE of President, stripping the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leader.

'Brainwash Complete'


.

Dingbat, don't you know the difference between an investigation, which, in this case, was an investigation into whether there was evidence to support the drafting of articles of impeachment, an investigation in which trump and members of his administration were invited to participate, and a trial, which only can be held by the Senate? No trials can be held by the House, so any assertion that the House refused "a fair trial" is fantastical bullshit. Under the Constitution, the House passes articles of impeachment and then refers the matter to the Senate for a trial. The House impeachment managers never declared that they were unprepared to present a case.

Do investigations "dig" for evidence? That's what they are intended to do. What you are demanding is that the suspect and his lawyer be present and be allowed to challenge the witness every time the cops interview a witness. This is not how investigations are conducted.

The fault lies entirely in the Senate, which refused to hear the evidence in conducting the trial. You can't blame any "snowflakes" for this dereliction of duty by the senators, their violation of their oaths, and their open display of disdain for the people of the U.S.A.

Why don't you familiarize yourself with the facts before mouthing off.

You're an idiot, you know that, Common Core?

The Senate Impeachment hearing was NOT an investigation. It was the 'trial'.

The House violated the Constitution by not holding a House vote to begin Impeachment investigations...but they investigated....and cane up with NO crime, NO evidence, and NO WITNESSES...but Impeached the President anyway.

They then matched their case to the Senate...but were not ready to present their case on which they voted to Impeach the President - they could not justify doing so.

Instead they declared it was a political Impeachment, declared the Senate was on trial, and declared if the Senate did not agree with their admitted partisan Impeachment then the Senate was 'guilty' too....

...and then they LOST.

And all snowflakes can do now is parrot the talking points of treasonous losers.

Like I said, the Senate holds the trial. The House only investigates as to whether one is warranted.

The House was never required to hold a vote to begin an investigation. The ensuing investigations did come up with evidence of a crime and witnesses, resulting in the drafting of articles of impeachment The House impeachment managers were ready to present their case. Obviously, they all arrived in the Senate chamber.

The republicans are at fault in not allowing a proper trial to occur. They have not given any coherent explanation of why. The republicans in the Senate were too cowardly to allow relevant evidence to be presented. In doing so, they violated their oath.

Lay it all out on the table. Let all witnesses be heard and all documents revealed on the floor of the Senate chamber, where all of the American People can review it. It has been trump who has refused to let his witnesses testify. trump himself should be questioned under oath.

The book about the republican senators will be entitled "Profiles in Cowardice."

An acquittal under these circumstances means nothing.

First of all, name the crime. Next, name the victim of said crime.

You cant so you wont.