You have to wonder how Trump supporters justify the senate blocking new witnesses

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
Most of us would endorse removing a standing president if there was stone cold hard facts to prove "high crimes or misdemeanors". We trust in the facts, and not the democrats malicious vindictive interpretations.
Democrats overstepped, that's it. Either they miscalculated and/or where deceitful. It smacks of sedition. I highly recommend this impeachment action be investigated by the DOJ.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”
That isn't what Lamar Alexander said. As you can see from his own words, he didn't need anymore witnesses, because he was already convinced trump was guilty of what he was charged with. But of course he'll vote not guilty in the republican senate sham trial.

After all, calling witnesses and introducing evidence in a trial is unheard of!!!

"I don't need to hear any more evidence to decide that the president did what he's charged with doing," Alexander told NPR's Steve Inskeep on Friday. "So if you've got eight witnesses saying that you left the scene of an accident, you don't need nine."
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

FB_IMG_1580555464112.jpg
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere


How in the fuck do you justify calling for his impeachment before the man was even sworn into office you leftwing nazi mental cases
Well, Billy IS a bit dim. This dimness is most likely caused by his severe TDS. Poor little fella.............
_____

Scientists are starting to take this TDS thing seriously. It appears to be incurable, and it is progressive---meaning for those of you educated in the public schools of rotting cities run by Democrats for 50 years---IT GETS WORSE as time goes by.

Right now they are honing in on an interesting phenomena---which is that people who know what sex they are, don't wear Pussy Hats, have an IQ over 105, and a steady job---hardly ever acquire Trump Derangement Syndrome.

What you Sufferers, like the O.P.---need to do is Look Inside. Introspection. See if you can identify something in your life not named TRUMP--is making you so Unhappy in your life that you are ready to wander innocently down the path of Bolshevism.
 
Last edited:
You’re basically saying Trump’s lawyers are incompetent in the face of all of this lol
Thank you for proving you are reading comprehension ILLITERATE.

The Democrats just got their asses kicked, Schiff's credibility is non-existent, Nadler is left resembling a fat, egotistical glory-seeking penguin who raced Schiff to the podium to answer a question, and Pelosi is left looking like a demented, incompetent, senile Speaker past her prime who has once AGAIN led the Democrats into losing the House.

Tlaib BOOed Hillary at the Bernie rally recently, joining those in the crowd who did so....Pelosi's House Impeachment failure, despite being pressured into it by the new radical left, is like proverbial 'blood in the water's...

AOC, Tlaib, and Omar - who have been challenging Pelosi for leadership since 2018 - are now openly attacking the 'OLD', WHITE dinosaur Democrats. They and their time will 'DIE' when the Democrats lose the House this fall....because of Pelosi...AGAIN.

The radicals have already forgotten how Brittain went CONSERVATIVE in their last election and how what happens there happens in the follow-on US elections....

They will blame Pelosi, but THEY are to blame for the defeat / loss of the House coming.
 
Only snowflakes wonder why the Senate would not allow the House Democrat's to use the Senate Impeachment hearing to keep digging / looking for evidence of a crime they did not have, not even when they voted to Impeach the President, especially after:

- Pelosi attempted to force the a Senate to comply with her demands on how the Senate hearings shod be run...

- The Democrats demanded the Senate hold a 'fair trial', something they refused to run in the House while justifying doing so by declaring they did not have to because this was a POLITICAL Impeachment...

- The Democrats marched into the Senate, declared they were unprepared to present their case for Impeachment hung the President, then declaring the SENATE was IN TRIAL

ONLY SNOWFLAKES would believe the Founding Fathers created Impeachment as a political weapon for elitist would-be rulers to use to strip the nation of their democratically-elected leader, to remove the PEOPLE'S CHOICE of President, stripping the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leader.

'Brainwash Complete'


.

Dingbat, don't you know the difference between an investigation, which, in this case, was an investigation into whether there was evidence to support the drafting of articles of impeachment, an investigation in which trump and members of his administration were invited to participate, and a trial, which only can be held by the Senate? No trials can be held by the House, so any assertion that the House refused "a fair trial" is fantastical bullshit. Under the Constitution, the House passes articles of impeachment and then refers the matter to the Senate for a trial. The House impeachment managers never declared that they were unprepared to present a case.

Do investigations "dig" for evidence? That's what they are intended to do. What you are demanding is that the suspect and his lawyer be present and be allowed to challenge the witness every time the cops interview a witness. This is not how investigations are conducted.

The fault lies entirely in the Senate, which refused to hear the evidence in conducting the trial. You can't blame any "snowflakes" for this dereliction of duty by the senators, their violation of their oaths, and their open display of disdain for the people of the U.S.A.

Why don't you familiarize yourself with the facts before mouthing off.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere


How many new witnesses were called during the Clinton trial?

ZERO sound about right?

The Dimwinger Butthurt over yet another loss if hilarious.:21:

All during the Senate trail:

Over three days, February 1–3, House managers took videotaped closed-door depositions from Monica Lewinsky, Clinton's friend Vernon Jordan, and White House aide Sidney Blumenthal. On February 4, however, the Senate voted 70–30 that excerpting these videotapes would suffice as testimony, rather than calling live witnesses to appear at trial. The videos were played in the Senate on February 6, featuring 30 excerpts of Lewinsky discussing her affidavit in the Paula Jones case, the hiding of small gifts Clinton had given her, and his involvement in procurement of a job for Lewinsky.
Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia

Never has a Senate trial not included witnesses, and tramp obstruction of everything is admitting his guilt.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere


I would have loved to see Hunter, Joe, Schiff, the Whistleblower and many more. That said, it is time to move on from this charade. The people will decide which one of us is right in November, something the Democrats don't see comfortable with at all.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere


How in the fuck do you justify calling for his impeachment before the man was even sworn into office you leftwing nazi mental cases
Well, Billy IS a bit dim. This dimness is most likely caused by his severe TDS. Poor little fella.............
_____

Scientists are starting to take this TDS thing seriously. It appears to be incurable, and it is progressive---meaning for those of you educated in the public schools of rotting cities run by Democrats for 50 years---IT GETS WORSE as time goes by.

Right now they are honing in on an interesting phenomena---which is that people who know what sex they are, don't wear Pussy Hats, have an IQ over 105, and a steady job---hardly ever acquire get Trump Derangement Syndrome.

What you Sufferers, like the O.P.---need to do is Look Inside. Introspection. See if you can identify something in you life not named TRUMP--is making you so Unhappy in your life that you are ready to wander innocently down the path of Bolshevism.
Thanks for the info. And the final stage of TDS appears to be that the one afflicted with it LITERALLY turns into a jackass and is doomed to braying unintelligible garbage for the rest of their wretched existence. (Only half-sarcasm.)
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere


I would have loved to see Hunter, Joe, Schiff, the Whistleblower and many more. That said, it is time to move on from this charade. The people will decide which one of us is right in November, something the Democrats don't see comfortable with at all.
Should have been dismissed due to lack of evidence the second it came to the Senate...............

Ray Charles can see it's nothing more than a Political CON JOB.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963
Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere


I would have loved to see Hunter, Joe, Schiff, the Whistleblower and many more. That said, it is time to move on from this charade. The people will decide which one of us is right in November, something the Democrats don't see comfortable with at all.
Should have been dismissed due to lack of evidence the second it came to the Senate...............

Ray Charles can see it's nothing more than a Political CON JOB.

Instead of complaining all day about it, you would think the Liberals would be ecstatic they have such a strong issue to campaign on all year :)
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963
Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.

Vote him out in November if you can.
 
Despite all the sanctimonious rhetoric, the Democrats didn't prove a damned thing. They reinterpret or misinterpreted the facts, and we all know it. The current impeachment action was a flimsy veiled attempt to remove an unpopular president, and it would set a dangerous precedent. This impeachment just reeks of sedition.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
I thought the Democrats had a "slam dunk"...

Apparently, they didn't have shit, and the Senate refused to do their job for them!!!

View attachment 303963
Oh right the spineless GOP voted to protect their own and you call that compelling evidence of his innocence.
LOL

If they had a real spine it would have been an immediate vote for dismissal the day it arrived.........But a few RINOs are still around for ya...........HEY.......You got Romney and Collins..........couldn't get the others in an election year huh...........

Let's take a look again at the evidence.
 
Only snowflakes wonder why the Senate would not allow the House Democrat's to use the Senate Impeachment hearing to keep digging / looking for evidence of a crime they did not have, not even when they voted to Impeach the President, especially after:

- Pelosi attempted to force the a Senate to comply with her demands on how the Senate hearings shod be run...

- The Democrats demanded the Senate hold a 'fair trial', something they refused to run in the House while justifying doing so by declaring they did not have to because this was a POLITICAL Impeachment...

- The Democrats marched into the Senate, declared they were unprepared to present their case for Impeachment hung the President, then declaring the SENATE was IN TRIAL

ONLY SNOWFLAKES would believe the Founding Fathers created Impeachment as a political weapon for elitist would-be rulers to use to strip the nation of their democratically-elected leader, to remove the PEOPLE'S CHOICE of President, stripping the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leader.

'Brainwash Complete'


.

Dingbat, don't you know the difference between an investigation, which, in this case, was an investigation into whether there was evidence to support the drafting of articles of impeachment, an investigation in which trump and members of his administration were invited to participate, and a trial, which only can be held by the Senate? No trials can be held by the House, so any assertion that the House refused "a fair trial" is fantastical bullshit. Under the Constitution, the House passes articles of impeachment and then refers the matter to the Senate for a trial. The House impeachment managers never declared that they were unprepared to present a case.

Do investigations "dig" for evidence? That's what they are intended to do. What you are demanding is that the suspect and his lawyer be present and be allowed to challenge the witness every time the cops interview a witness. This is not how investigations are conducted.

The fault lies entirely in the Senate, which refused to hear the evidence in conducting the trial. You can't blame any "snowflakes" for this dereliction of duty by the senators, their violation of their oaths, and their open display of disdain for the people of the U.S.A.

Why don't you familiarize yourself with the facts before mouthing off.
You're an idiot, you know that, Common Core?

The Senate Impeachment hearing was NOT an investigation. It was the 'trial'.

The House violated the Constitution by not holding a House vote to begin Impeachment investigations...but they investigated....and cane up with NO crime, NO evidence, and NO WITNESSES...but Impeached the President anyway.

They then matched their case to the Senate...but were not ready to present their case on which they voted to Impeach the President - they could not justify doing so.

Instead they declared it was a political Impeachment, declared the Senate was on trial, and declared if the Senate did not agree with their admitted partisan Impeachment then the Senate was 'guilty' too....

...and then they LOST.

And all snowflakes can do now is parrot the talking points of treasonous losers.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

The House called witnesses when they wrote their articles of impeachment. Those are the same witnesses the Senate will call, and should call.

If the supposed witness wasn't required in the house, then why should it be in the Senate?

Yes, I will support the results of the Senate. They are operating within the constitution. Perfectly good to do that.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
Whole thing is a moronic sham, and you're an idiot for acting like it isn't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top