You have to wonder how Trump supporters justify the senate blocking new witnesses

They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

Why didn't the House do due diligence? They could have called anyone they wanted.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

If they didn't have enough witnesses why did they vote to impeach in the first place?
If its not legit, you have to acquit!
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
The House doesn't have a say in what the Senate does.
 
Trump
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

Look, clearly you haven’t figured out what this entire impeachment process is. It is political war.

The democrats started the war. They really never thought they could remove Trump, but they hoped to damage him enough to win the Presidency in 2020. So they started their impeachment investigation, gathered all the evidence they could, came up with very little, and sent the whole mess to the Senate in a 100% PARTISAN VOTE.

The senate is controlled by the other warring party, so the Dems were fighting on enemy territory and at a disadvantage. Their hope was to bring witnesses forward to embarrass and damage Trump, but they failed to put on a strong enough case that would encourage enough republicans to break ranks. Although they did get 2, so the “no witnesses” vote was not as completely partisan as the house impeachment vote.
The democrats aren't acting in the nation's best interest on impeachment. This an example of the liberal "cancel culture" , reminds me of republican Joseph McCarthy overstepping on Communism. We know how that ended...
 
Last edited:
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

You know Billy-E-Baloney, you need to go in order to solve problems.

The 1st question needs to be------->why didn't the House allow Trump to call witnesses, and why did the House claim they called 17 witnesses, when they actually called 18?

Enquiring minds want to know! Go sleuth around and figure that out for us, we are waiting for a report, then we will all address your concerns-)
 
Only snowflakes wonder why the Senate would not allow the House Democrat's to use the Senate Impeachment hearing to keep digging / looking for evidence of a crime they did not have, not even when they voted to Impeach the President, especially after:

- Pelosi attempted to force the a Senate to comply with her demands on how the Senate hearings shod be run...

- The Democrats demanded the Senate hold a 'fair trial', something they refused to run in the House while justifying doing so by declaring they did not have to because this was a POLITICAL Impeachment...

- The Democrats marched into the Senate, declared they were unprepared to present their case for Impeachment hung the President, then declaring the SENATE was IN TRIAL

ONLY SNOWFLAKES would believe the Founding Fathers created Impeachment as a political weapon for elitist would-be rulers to use to strip the nation of their democratically-elected leader, to remove the PEOPLE'S CHOICE of President, stripping the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leader.

'Brainwash Complete'


.

Dingbat, don't you know the difference between an investigation, which, in this case, was an investigation into whether there was evidence to support the drafting of articles of impeachment, an investigation in which trump and members of his administration were invited to participate, and a trial, which only can be held by the Senate? No trials can be held by the House, so any assertion that the House refused "a fair trial" is fantastical bullshit. Under the Constitution, the House passes articles of impeachment and then refers the matter to the Senate for a trial. The House impeachment managers never declared that they were unprepared to present a case.

Do investigations "dig" for evidence? That's what they are intended to do. What you are demanding is that the suspect and his lawyer be present and be allowed to challenge the witness every time the cops interview a witness. This is not how investigations are conducted.

The fault lies entirely in the Senate, which refused to hear the evidence in conducting the trial. You can't blame any "snowflakes" for this dereliction of duty by the senators, their violation of their oaths, and their open display of disdain for the people of the U.S.A.

Why don't you familiarize yourself with the facts before mouthing off.
You're an idiot, you know that, Common Core?

The Senate Impeachment hearing was NOT an investigation. It was the 'trial'.

The House violated the Constitution by not holding a House vote to begin Impeachment investigations...but they investigated....and cane up with NO crime, NO evidence, and NO WITNESSES...but Impeached the President anyway.

They then matched their case to the Senate...but were not ready to present their case on which they voted to Impeach the President - they could not justify doing so.

Instead they declared it was a political Impeachment, declared the Senate was on trial, and declared if the Senate did not agree with their admitted partisan Impeachment then the Senate was 'guilty' too....

...and then they LOST.

And all snowflakes can do now is parrot the talking points of treasonous losers.

Like I said, the Senate holds the trial. The House only investigates as to whether one is warranted.

The House was never required to hold a vote to begin an investigation. The ensuing investigations did come up with evidence of a crime and witnesses, resulting in the drafting of articles of impeachment The House impeachment managers were ready to present their case. Obviously, they all arrived in the Senate chamber.

The republicans are at fault in not allowing a proper trial to occur. They have not given any coherent explanation of why. The republicans in the Senate were too cowardly to allow relevant evidence to be presented. In doing so, they violated their oath.

Lay it all out on the table. Let all witnesses be heard and all documents revealed on the floor of the Senate chamber, where all of the American People can review it. It has been trump who has refused to let his witnesses testify. trump himself should be questioned under oath.

The book about the republican senators will be entitled "Profiles in Cowardice."

An acquittal under these circumstances means nothing.


First of all, name the crime. Next, name the victim of said crime.

You cant so you wont.
The Democrats impeachment motto: "If you cant dazzle them with facts, confuse them with bullshit" . Accept they failed miserably. Oh boo hoo, Senate is corrupt because because they didn't swallow our gaslighting. How unfair.
 
Justified by the ever standing fact that the Senate does not do the work of the House by calling witnesses.
Pretty much you all are saying you feel the Sky is green and anyone that does not should be impeached.
They would have called but the con blocked everything.
Now you don’t believe Bolton?
The ultimate right winger?

Here we have a no education grade school dropout ^^^^^. Trump went to the courts (you know, the LEGAL remedy for disputes between the other two branches) while you morons CHOSE not to take your legal option. YOUR fault. Period. Believe Bolton? You mean the guy YOUR man Schitty himself said was a liar and no worth as a witness? That Bolton?
 
Only snowflakes wonder why the Senate would not allow the House Democrat's to use the Senate Impeachment hearing to keep digging / looking for evidence of a crime they did not have, not even when they voted to Impeach the President, especially after:

- Pelosi attempted to force the a Senate to comply with her demands on how the Senate hearings shod be run...

- The Democrats demanded the Senate hold a 'fair trial', something they refused to run in the House while justifying doing so by declaring they did not have to because this was a POLITICAL Impeachment...

- The Democrats marched into the Senate, declared they were unprepared to present their case for Impeachment hung the President, then declaring the SENATE was IN TRIAL

ONLY SNOWFLAKES would believe the Founding Fathers created Impeachment as a political weapon for elitist would-be rulers to use to strip the nation of their democratically-elected leader, to remove the PEOPLE'S CHOICE of President, stripping the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leader.

'Brainwash Complete'


.

Dingbat, don't you know the difference between an investigation, which, in this case, was an investigation into whether there was evidence to support the drafting of articles of impeachment, an investigation in which trump and members of his administration were invited to participate, and a trial, which only can be held by the Senate? No trials can be held by the House, so any assertion that the House refused "a fair trial" is fantastical bullshit. Under the Constitution, the House passes articles of impeachment and then refers the matter to the Senate for a trial. The House impeachment managers never declared that they were unprepared to present a case.

Do investigations "dig" for evidence? That's what they are intended to do. What you are demanding is that the suspect and his lawyer be present and be allowed to challenge the witness every time the cops interview a witness. This is not how investigations are conducted.

The fault lies entirely in the Senate, which refused to hear the evidence in conducting the trial. You can't blame any "snowflakes" for this dereliction of duty by the senators, their violation of their oaths, and their open display of disdain for the people of the U.S.A.

Why don't you familiarize yourself with the facts before mouthing off.

And maybe you should learn something before firing off your Mike Pence desiring mouth. The Senate heard NO evidence? Damn you’re stupid. There was NO fair hearing in the House as Schitt for brains denied witnesses and questions. No cross examination allowed by Republicans. The Senate is under NO obligation to fix the House’s screw ups. Maybe try to actually do your job next time. Oh wait, after November you won’t get a next time.
 
I am NO great mind, hardly. In my humble opinion, the Democrat-led impeachment committee overstepped, and their so called "facts" just amounts to gas-lighting. The Democrats never proved Trump violated any law above a reasonable doubt. They have basically tried to remove a elected official unlawfully. Sedition, plain pure and simple.
 
There is no crime. When you have no crime, you don't need a trial.

The Dem's successfully put an innocent man on trial. They are lucky the Senate didn't dismiss the case immediately. Schiff got his 15 minutes, now it is time to move on.
 
Justified by the ever standing fact that the Senate does not do the work of the House by calling witnesses.
Pretty much you all are saying you feel the Sky is green and anyone that does not should be impeached.
They would have called but the con blocked everything.
Now you don’t believe Bolton?
The ultimate right winger?

Here we have a no education grade school dropout ^^^^^. Trump went to the courts (you know, the LEGAL remedy for disputes between the other two branches) while you morons CHOSE not to take your legal option. YOUR fault. Period. Believe Bolton? You mean the guy YOUR man Schitty himself said was a liar and no worth as a witness? That Bolton?
The three stooges that led this failed impeachment /Coup d’état,: They have to realize, that they cant get away with this. Sedition is a serious offence.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere



YOur desire to have a witch hunt and fishing expedition, and to milk this for your allies in the press to lie about,


is denied.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
All your threads/posts seem to be lagging well behind the time line of events...time for you to move on to the next hoax don't ya think?
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere

We are not a democracy, dumbshit.

Don't like it...? Run for office.

In the meantime SFTU.
 
They of course say - with no facts in mind - “the whole thing is a sham anyway! There’s no need to call new witnesses!”

Of course, the logical thing for republicans to support is allow those witnesses to testify. If they truly believed the whole thing was a partisan sham, a fair trial would expose that. Instead, they want to take the cowardly road and just end the trial as quickly as possible. Bolton was a RINO all along anyway, right?!

Is that fair to all Americans? No of course not. Most Americans supported calling new witnesses. Republicans don’t because everyone else’s opinions do not matter. This brings up a couple possible reasons for trump supporters to not want the trial to continue:

1) They will support Trump regardless of what he does

2) They secretly know Trump did wrong doing in the eyes’ of the law (just ask the GAO) but don’t want it to come out and look stupid on this board and elsewhere
giphy.webp
 

Forum List

Back
Top