- Thread starter
- #21
you are telling this based on what ?based on your source.but usa attacked iraq and afghanistan
80% sudia arabian
20% pakistani
all of them was wahabi salafi
![]()
It's simple man. THat's where Al Queada were -- in Afghanistan. Never should have stuck around for over a decade -- but hitting the Taliban for harboring Al Queda was totally justified.
And I might say -- if your little Iranian patrol boats keep playing "chicken" with the US fleet -- we might have to stop that as well.... Or your leadership cooperates with the N. Korean on nuclear weapons.
I'd worry more about those things frankly...... And if you need a definition of "playing chicken" --- I'll be glad to help..![]()
al qaede came in afghanistan because of usa-russia(sovient ) cold war in afghanistan.
but bin laden came from what ?bin laden was suidi arabian prince
source and root is suidi arabia.
if you kill root.,....
His FAMILY was largely innocent of any connections to 9/11.. Other Saudis maybe. But the bin Ladin family was highly invested in America and not a threat. And HE directed the attack from Afghanistan.
That's why they are called "stateless" terrorist groups. THere's no convenient GPS coordinate for their "capital" or their assets.
because bush campaign told it to you?