#47Traitors, And It's No Longer 1860 In America!

[RetiredGySgt]

The evidence was provided, you did not like it, and have been trolling ever since.

No evidence was provided all you said was the Logan act which does not apply to Senators and is in fact not treason as defined by the Constitution. Or perhaps you can link me to the post where you claim it was provided?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Still waiting for the explanation of how this was treason.

Article3 Section 3

1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Constitution for the United States - We the People

I mean really explain which of the two parts of Treason are involved.

The Logan Act.

The Logan act is not treason unless one is talking to an enemy State and offering them aid.

 

[JakeStarkey]

JakeStarky, one more time: You are a fucking idiot!

Trolling.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Still waiting for the explanation of how this was treason.

Article3 Section 3

1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Constitution for the United States - We the People

I mean really explain which of the two parts of Treason are involved.

The Logan Act.

The Logan act is not treason unless one is talking to an enemy State and offering them aid.

Aiding and abetting, which they were doing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The evidence was provided, you did not like it, and have been trolling ever since.

No evidence was provided all you said was the Logan act which does not apply to Senators and is in fact not treason as defined by the Constitution. Or perhaps you can link me to the post where you claim it was provided?

Not "just once more." Trolling.

 

[Vigilante]

Why is John Kerry not LOCKED UP for breaking the Logan Act?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Still waiting for the explanation of how this was treason.

Article3 Section 3

1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Constitution for the United States - We the People

I mean really explain which of the two parts of Treason are involved.

The Logan Act.

The Logan act is not treason unless one is talking to an enemy State and offering them aid.

Aiding and abetting, which they were doing.

How is telling Iran a treaty to help them will be taken away, helping them? And explain when we declared war or have a resolution to use force or are fighting Iran began?

 

[whitehall]

whitehall, there were atrocities by our side in Vietnam. Lots of them. You don't get victimize the victims with your mean stupidity.

RGS, you don't "just once more."

Undermining the mission and giving aid and comfort to the enemy is OK as long as you think America was wrong?

 

[Billo_Really]

The Logan act is not treason unless one is talking to an enemy State and offering them aid.

It doesn't say that.

Are you saying Iran is not an enemy state?

 

[Billo_Really]

How is telling Iran a treaty to help them will be taken away, helping them? And explain when we declared war or have a resolution to use force or are fighting Iran began?

It's not the job of Congressional members to discuss treaties with foreign leaders. But I guess you're in to "trained seals", because that's what they look like, TRAINED FUCKING SEALS!

 

[Wildman]

History recalls that Republicans are hard to predict.

Despite the networks’ eagerness to tout Democratic opposition to the GOP letter, on two separate occasions the “big three” completely ignored a letter penned by former Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) written to the Soviet Union in 1983 aimed at undermining President Ronald Reagan’s nuclear negotiations with the Communist regime.

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.

- See more at: Flashback Big Three Ignored Ted Kennedy s Letter to Soviet Union

you are OK with this or are you too young to even know about this little charming FACT !!

or this:

the following can be found here:
7 Times Democrats Advised America s Enemies to Oppose the President - Breitbart

House Speaker Jim Wright (D-TX). In 1984, 10 Democrats sent a letter to Daniel Ortega Saavedra, the head of the military dictatorship in Nicaragua, praising Saavedra for “taking steps to open up the political process in your country.” House Speaker Jim Wright signed the letter.

and this:

Senator John Kerry (D-MA). Kerry jumped into the pro-Sandanista pool himself in 1985, when he traveled to Nicaragua to negotiate with the regime. He wasn’t alone; Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) joined him. The Christian Science Monitor reported that the two senators “brought back word that Mr. Ortega would be willing to accept a cease-fire if Congress rejected aid to the rebels…That week the House initially voted down aid to the contras, and Mr. Ortega made an immediate trip to Moscow.” Kerry then shilled on behalf of the Ortega government:

something more recent,

Representatives Jim McDermott (D-WA), David Bonior (D-MI), and Mike Thompson (D-CA). In 2002, the three Congressmen visited Baghdad to play defense for Saddam Hussein’s regime. There, McDermott laid the groundwork for the Democratic Party’s later rip on President George W. Bush, stating, “the president of the United States will lie to the American people in order to get us into this war.” McDermott, along with his colleagues, suggested that the American administration give the Iraqi regime “due process” and “take the Iraqis on their face value.” Bonior said openly he was acting on behalf of the government:

all this is right with you ? i do not expect you to reply because you will not want to put your stupid commie views on public display. please do not be afraid to open those links.., unless you are fearful of TRUTH !! .......

oooooh !! just for all good commies, a salute to you.., ..........

 

[JakeStarkey]

whitehall, there were atrocities by our side in Vietnam. Lots of them. You don't get victimize the victims with your mean stupidity.

RGS, you don't "just once more."

Undermining the mission and giving aid and comfort to the enemy is OK as long as you think America was wrong?

Those are merely your words that mean nothing. You will never find that I said anything of the sort: that's simply in your diseased mind.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still waiting for the explanation of how this was treason.

Article3 Section 3

1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Constitution for the United States - We the People

I mean really explain which of the two parts of Treason are involved.

The Logan Act.

The Logan act is not treason unless one is talking to an enemy State and offering them aid.

Aiding and abetting, which they were doing.

Aiding and abetting, which they were doing.

LOL!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yup.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Laughable.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You often are, yes.

 

[Bfgrn]

The newly elected Senator from Arkansas, Cotton, famously likes to remind people that everyone Ivy League is better than everyone else. So recently, in foreign relations, he wrote a letter. Now, days later, no one can agree with the mainly, mentally, misguided version of the world, anymore. U. S. Law can otherwise be shown to be mainly, mentally, misguided. People like Senator Cotton, are better now regarded as being a real part of that.

Senate GOP s Iran letter sparks outrage 47Traitors trend - NY Daily News

History recalls that Republicans are hard to predict. Like much of what they do, no one notes the great North American attempted genocide, 1861-1865, of U. S. white nationals. The Russians remember the Nazis. The Israeli Prime Minister recalled that Jews were only actually a part of the 50 million killed in WWII. Even now GOP mostly celebrates, "Freedom" as leading to a seat at the back of the bus. The skin is black. The mental heritage of the national and tribal, heritage and cultures: Was successfully eradicated in the slave trade.

So the world again has noted the Republican mentality, through their Senator from Arkansas, not at all a Clinton. The Secretary of State Clinton even had the good sense to keeps emails in a location, guarded by Secret Service. GOP representative Issa, comparing, may have even burned his location down--through an arsonist.

Now the #blackprez, of cartoonist notoriety, has created an initiative in the Middle East. The leader of the Israelis came to the Congress, showing that apparently there are no alternatives to the initiative under way. There is no apparent GOP alternative initiative in the offing.

Now the absence of clear direction is widely being noted, likely worldwide: And generally like is GOP as usual.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Holy Father in Rome now intends a patron saint of genocide, Father Junipero Serra, following along the moral tradition of the likely regarded, Pedophile Missionary Saint. Many maybe not aware of the differing versions of "How The West Was Won(?)! For this, we just used to have TV(?)!)

Jim Crow laws were entirely the Democrat's and also there's the fact that a higher percentage of Republicans in Congress voted for the Civil Rights Act than did Democrats.

My question to you is, are all liberals as dumb as you are?

False. Jim Crow laws were entirely CONSERVATIVE regardless of party...

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was proposed by President Kennedy, and pushed for very hard by President Johnson. Northern Republicans like Everett Dirksen certainly helped pass the bill, and to overcome and out-maneuver the "Southern Bloc" of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) who launched a filibuster to prevent its passage. But support for the bill was divided along the same lines as the Civil War.

By party and region

Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–-87 (7%–-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–-10 (0%–-100%)

Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%–-15%)

The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1–-20 (5%–-95%)
Southern Republicans: 0–-1 (0%–-100%)
Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%–-2%)
Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%–-16%)

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lonestar ignores numbers and definitions to come up with his distorted world.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Yup.

How does one aid and abet by telling a Country the future president will not honor a treaty?