54 years ago November 22 1963

[gipper]

President Kennedy was assassinated by the leftist Oswald

JFK Assassination - News, Pictures, and Videos - CBS News

"by the leftist Oswald"

--- who wasn't even up in the window where only Malcolm Wallace's fingerprints were found..
--- who couldn't possibly have delivered the fatal shot from the front, when he was behind the car....
--- who couldn't possibly have fired enough bullets for three to hit Kennedy, another to hit Connally, another to hit the windshield, another to hit the street and another to land in the grass...
--- who was CIA trained and knew by the time the cops came into the movie theater that he had been set up, that if he ran out the side door he'd be met with a hail of bullets conveniently putting him out of the way so he couldn't say what he knew, which is why he started yelling "I am not resisting arrest" to the witnesses....
--- who had to be messily dispatched in a brutal and obviously set-up mob killing on live TV to make sure he never told what he knew...

Holy SHIT how freaking gullible are you?

Yes he was up in the window and your claim THAT only another man's fingerprints were found is a falsehood.
Yes the shots including the fatal headshot were all well within the range of his ability.
Three bullets did not hit Kennedy two did and they were both fired from Oswald.
He was never CIA trained.
There was nothing obvious about his killing.

Oswald acted alone as he evidence supports and none refutes, try again without the failure

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Doesn't fucking matter "who could make" the shots

of course it does you just made the claim that oswald was "only a sharpshooter"

Now you're just blatantly lying. I've never posted anything about Oswald's shooting ability. At all.
You completely pulled that out of your ass.

Go learn how to read.

Mac Wallace was a professional hit man and sharpshooter. Fact

so it according to you --LOL it was impossible for oswald to take the shots

Apparently the simple fact that a statement about "Wallace" cannot by definition be a statement about "Oswald" sails completely over your head. Why am I not surprised.

***yet***

it is totally possible for Wallace to take the shots

because he was a "sharpshooter" --LOL ya idiot

No, Shit-for-brains, because his fingerprints were up there, DUMBASS.

No prints from Lee Harvey Oswald were found in that area. Fact.

so what did they find wallaces prints on the gun

Glad you brought that up. Because when the cops first searched the place and located a gun, they inspected it saying "anyone know what this is?" and a firearms expert with them declared whatever they were looking at to be a German Mauser. Which I'm pretty sure is not Italian.

Wallace's fingerprints were found IIRC on some boxes. Presumably ones he either propped his firearm on, or moved out of his way.

Leaving his prints, known as a hit man, was one of several mistakes in this sloppy operation. But it is impossible for Lee Harvey Oswald to leave Malcolm Wallace's fingerprints. That's uh, why they use fingerprints. They're individually unique.

Sorry if this is all too complex for your simplistic intellect.

Now you're just blatantly lying. I've never posted anything about Oswald's shooting ability


yes you did now are saying that oswald was capable of firing the three shots

Now you're lying about your own lying.

Go ahead Captain Pissbucket, prove me wrong --- QUOTE me posting something about Lee Harvey Oswald's shooting ability.

Fucking liar.

Oswald was a sharpshooter in the Marines which his record proves.

The shooting he accomplished was not difficult or challenging it was in fact within the capability ot literally millions of shooters and deer hunters.

Oswald's prints were found at the scene your claim that it was strictly Malcolm Wallace is false.
In fact there is no record whatsoever of fingerprints of a Malcolm Wallace at the scene.

But there are arrest of records of several people in Dealey that day which you also lied about

 

[Soupnazi630]

President Kennedy was assassinated by the leftist Oswald

JFK Assassination - News, Pictures, and Videos - CBS News

"by the leftist Oswald"

--- who wasn't even up in the window where only Malcolm Wallace's fingerprints were found..
--- who couldn't possibly have delivered the fatal shot from the front, when he was behind the car....
--- who couldn't possibly have fired enough bullets for three to hit Kennedy, another to hit Connally, another to hit the windshield, another to hit the street and another to land in the grass...
--- who was CIA trained and knew by the time the cops came into the movie theater that he had been set up, that if he ran out the side door he'd be met with a hail of bullets conveniently putting him out of the way so he couldn't say what he knew, which is why he started yelling "I am not resisting arrest" to the witnesses....
--- who had to be messily dispatched in a brutal and obviously set-up mob killing on live TV to make sure he never told what he knew...

Holy SHIT how freaking gullible are you?

Yes he was up in the window and your claim THAT only another man's fingerprints were found is a falsehood.
Yes the shots including the fatal headshot were all well within the range of his ability.
Three bullets did not hit Kennedy two did and they were both fired from Oswald.
He was never CIA trained.
There was nothing obvious about his killing.

Oswald acted alone as he evidence supports and none refutes, try again without the failure

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald was a Marxist revolutionary. He had nothing to do with liberalism in any sense of the word.

And if he had, he certainly wouldn't have killed JFK.

Silly. Oswald was a Deep State soldier, just doing what he was told to do by the Deep State.

If anything he was an ardent anti-communist. Just like most US Marines of that time.

He never fire a gun that day...and there is no doubt about it.

He did fire his rifle as is proven by evidence and he was a former Marine and nothing else.

He was a communist and no anti communist as the evidence proves

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald was a Marxist revolutionary. He had nothing to do with liberalism in any sense of the word.

And if he had, he certainly wouldn't have Lib

President Kennedy was assassinated by the leftist Oswald

JFK Assassination - News, Pictures, and Videos - CBS News

"by the leftist Oswald"

--- who wasn't even up in the window where only Malcolm Wallace's fingerprints were found..
--- who couldn't possibly have delivered the fatal shot from the front, when he was behind the car....
--- who couldn't possibly have fired enough bullets for three to hit Kennedy, another to hit Connally, another to hit the windshield, another to hit the street and another to land in the grass...
--- who was CIA trained and knew by the time the cops came into the movie theater that he had been set up, that if he ran out the side door he'd be met with a hail of bullets conveniently putting him out of the way so he couldn't say what he knew, which is why he started yelling "I am not resisting arrest" to the witnesses....
--- who had to be messily dispatched in a brutal and obviously set-up mob killing on live TV to make sure he never told what he knew...

Holy SHIT how freaking gullible are you?

Yes he was up in the window and your claim THAT only another man's fingerprints were found is a falsehood.
Yes the shots including the fatal headshot were all well within the range of his ability.
Three bullets did not hit Kennedy two did and they were both fired from Oswald.
He was never CIA trained.
There was nothing obvious about his killing.

Oswald acted alone as he evidence supports and none refutes, try again without the failure

Oh no...the Nazi is here to blow his smoke and statist propaganda.

Always the fascist. His motto is:
“All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.”

You mean the SOUPNAZI which debunked and humiliated your uneducated ass on other threads.

Also who you just lied about as i never said any such thing.

You always do lie and run like a coward when I force facts and evidence in your face.

Let's do it again you will be pwned and crushed like last time

 

[Pogo]

"by the leftist Oswald"

--- who wasn't even up in the window where only Malcolm Wallace's fingerprints were found..
--- who couldn't possibly have delivered the fatal shot from the front, when he was behind the car....
--- who couldn't possibly have fired enough bullets for three to hit Kennedy, another to hit Connally, another to hit the windshield, another to hit the street and another to land in the grass...
--- who was CIA trained and knew by the time the cops came into the movie theater that he had been set up, that if he ran out the side door he'd be met with a hail of bullets conveniently putting him out of the way so he couldn't say what he knew, which is why he started yelling "I am not resisting arrest" to the witnesses....
--- who had to be messily dispatched in a brutal and obviously set-up mob killing on live TV to make sure he never told what he knew...

Holy SHIT how freaking gullible are you?

Yes he was up in the window and your claim THAT only another man's fingerprints were found is a falsehood.
Yes the shots including the fatal headshot were all well within the range of his ability.
Three bullets did not hit Kennedy two did and they were both fired from Oswald.
He was never CIA trained.
There was nothing obvious about his killing.

Oswald acted alone as he evidence supports and none refutes, try again without the failure

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

 

[gipper]

Oswald was a Marxist revolutionary. He had nothing to do with liberalism in any sense of the word.

And if he had, he certainly wouldn't have killed JFK.

Silly. Oswald was a Deep State soldier, just doing what he was told to do by the Deep State.

If anything he was an ardent anti-communist. Just like most US Marines of that time.

He never fire a gun that day...and there is no doubt about it.

He did fire his rifle as is proven by evidence and he was a former Marine and nothing else.

He was a communist and no anti communist as the evidence proves

Oswald was a CIA operative....like you.

Did you ever check with your CIA daddy to see if he knew Oswald?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes he was up in the window and your claim THAT only another man's fingerprints were found is a falsehood.
Yes the shots including the fatal headshot were all well within the range of his ability.
Three bullets did not hit Kennedy two did and they were both fired from Oswald.
He was never CIA trained.
There was nothing obvious about his killing.

Oswald acted alone as he evidence supports and none refutes, try again without the failure

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald was a Marxist revolutionary. He had nothing to do with liberalism in any sense of the word.

And if he had, he certainly wouldn't have killed JFK.

Silly. Oswald was a Deep State soldier, just doing what he was told to do by the Deep State.

If anything he was an ardent anti-communist. Just like most US Marines of that time.

He never fire a gun that day...and there is no doubt about it.

He did fire his rifle as is proven by evidence and he was a former Marine and nothing else.

He was a communist and no anti communist as the evidence proves

Oswald was a CIA operative....like you.

Did you ever check with your CIA daddy to see if he knew Oswald?

No he was not and neither am I.

you are no authority on the subject and have no evidence proving you merely dream crap up as you go because you are too dim and uninformed to offer and intelligent argument

 

[Pogo]

President Kennedy was assassinated by the leftist Oswald

JFK Assassination - News, Pictures, and Videos - CBS News

"by the leftist Oswald"

--- who wasn't even up in the window where only Malcolm Wallace's fingerprints were found..
--- who couldn't possibly have delivered the fatal shot from the front, when he was behind the car....
--- who couldn't possibly have fired enough bullets for three to hit Kennedy, another to hit Connally, another to hit the windshield, another to hit the street and another to land in the grass...
--- who was CIA trained and knew by the time the cops came into the movie theater that he had been set up, that if he ran out the side door he'd be met with a hail of bullets conveniently putting him out of the way so he couldn't say what he knew, which is why he started yelling "I am not resisting arrest" to the witnesses....
--- who had to be messily dispatched in a brutal and obviously set-up mob killing on live TV to make sure he never told what he knew...

Holy SHIT how freaking gullible are you?

Yes he was up in the window and your claim THAT only another man's fingerprints were found is a falsehood.
Yes the shots including the fatal headshot were all well within the range of his ability.
Three bullets did not hit Kennedy two did and they were both fired from Oswald.
He was never CIA trained.
There was nothing obvious about his killing.

Oswald acted alone as he evidence supports and none refutes, try again without the failure

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

Back and to the left... which is two dimensions.... and also UP, the third dimension.

At least two of those three are impossible under the laws of physics from the TSBD-6. Absolutely cannot be done.

 

[Pogo]

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

Yuh huh. So now you're saying it depends on what the definition of "I" is.

 

[gipper]

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

the forward movement was from the bullet that entered his throat...then the head shot from the front right sent him back and to the left.

Only a dupe would think otherwise....or a CIA plant, which you clearly are.

 

[Soupnazi630]

"by the leftist Oswald"

--- who wasn't even up in the window where only Malcolm Wallace's fingerprints were found..
--- who couldn't possibly have delivered the fatal shot from the front, when he was behind the car....
--- who couldn't possibly have fired enough bullets for three to hit Kennedy, another to hit Connally, another to hit the windshield, another to hit the street and another to land in the grass...
--- who was CIA trained and knew by the time the cops came into the movie theater that he had been set up, that if he ran out the side door he'd be met with a hail of bullets conveniently putting him out of the way so he couldn't say what he knew, which is why he started yelling "I am not resisting arrest" to the witnesses....
--- who had to be messily dispatched in a brutal and obviously set-up mob killing on live TV to make sure he never told what he knew...

Holy SHIT how freaking gullible are you?

Yes he was up in the window and your claim THAT only another man's fingerprints were found is a falsehood.
Yes the shots including the fatal headshot were all well within the range of his ability.
Three bullets did not hit Kennedy two did and they were both fired from Oswald.
He was never CIA trained.
There was nothing obvious about his killing.

Oswald acted alone as he evidence supports and none refutes, try again without the failure

SMH

Care to essplain to the class how a shooter positioned well BEHIND the car is able to put a front shot through the windshield, another front shot that pierces the President's throat and a third front shot that very obviously blasts off the right side of his head pushing his whole body violently BACK?


Nah, didn't think so.

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

Back and to the left... which is two dimensions.... and also UP, the third dimension.

At least two of those three are impossible under the laws of physics from the TSBD-6. Absolutely cannot be done.

Back and to the left caused by neuro muscular reaction and the jet effect AFTER moving forward which was caused by the bullet.

the laws of physics prove you wrong and proves me correct.

you are ignorant of science as you are of everything else

 

[Soupnazi630]

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

the forward movement was from the bullet that entered his throat...then the head shot from the front right sent him back and to the left.

Only a dupe would think otherwise....or a CIA plant, which you clearly are.

There was no entrance wound to his throat proving you wrong.

The head would not move at all from a wound below the head.

There are no CIA plants and the evidence proves you wrong and a liar

 

[gipper]

Oswald was a Marxist revolutionary. He had nothing to do with liberalism in any sense of the word.

And if he had, he certainly wouldn't have killed JFK.

Silly. Oswald was a Deep State soldier, just doing what he was told to do by the Deep State.

If anything he was an ardent anti-communist. Just like most US Marines of that time.

He never fire a gun that day...and there is no doubt about it.

He did fire his rifle as is proven by evidence and he was a former Marine and nothing else.

He was a communist and no anti communist as the evidence proves

Oswald was a CIA operative....like you.

Did you ever check with your CIA daddy to see if he knew Oswald?

No he was not and neither am I.

you are no authority on the subject and have no evidence proving you merely dream crap up as you go because you are too dim and uninformed to offer and intelligent argument

I am an authority, which has exposed you as a liar numerous times. Must I do it again?

 

[Soupnazi630]

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

Yuh huh. So now you're saying it depends on what the definition of "I" is.

No I never said any such thing and you are failing miserably to turn it personal

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald was a Marxist revolutionary. He had nothing to do with liberalism in any sense of the word.

And if he had, he certainly wouldn't have killed JFK.

Silly. Oswald was a Deep State soldier, just doing what he was told to do by the Deep State.

If anything he was an ardent anti-communist. Just like most US Marines of that time.

He never fire a gun that day...and there is no doubt about it.

He did fire his rifle as is proven by evidence and he was a former Marine and nothing else.

He was a communist and no anti communist as the evidence proves

Oswald was a CIA operative....like you.

Did you ever check with your CIA daddy to see if he knew Oswald?

No he was not and neither am I.

you are no authority on the subject and have no evidence proving you merely dream crap up as you go because you are too dim and uninformed to offer and intelligent argument

I am an authority, which has exposed you as a liar numerous times. Must I do it again?

No you are not at all you are completely ignorant uninformed and immature.

you also know that you lost every argument and I made you my bitch which is why you dropped it and ran away

 

[gipper]

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

the forward movement was from the bullet that entered his throat...then the head shot from the front right sent him back and to the left.

Only a dupe would think otherwise....or a CIA plant, which you clearly are.

There was no entrance wound to his throat proving you wrong.

The head would not move at all from a wound below the head.

There are no CIA plants and the evidence proves you wrong and a liar

You must have watched the CIA approved Zap film. LMFAO!!!

Clearly he brings his hands up to clutch his throat (from the bullet entering his throat) and binding forward, he takes the head shot from the front right, which sends his brain and skull fragments to the rear...resulting in Jackie crawling on the trunk lid to get his skull...and the SS agent who jumped on the car covered in JFK's brains.

Must I educate you on everything?

 

[Soupnazi630]

There was no front shot through the windshield. the holes in the windshield were from bullet fragments which originated from BEHIND the president which is consistent with Oswald's position.

There was also no frontal shot which hit the president, the wound in his throat was an exit wound,

The shot did not push his head back. A close examination shows his head was actually pushed slightly forward before moving violently back. A bullet of that size and speed would not push the body in any significant manner it would only move the head an inch or two. The back ward movement was caused by the jet effect and neuro - muscular reaction which is very common.

Yes you do not think which is the problem you are full of inconsistencies and falsehoods which are easily debunked y facts.

Rather than merely listening to any half assed conspiracy theorists try looking at evidence. You are woefully uninformed on this subject

Back and to the left....back and to the left...back and to the left.

Apparently you fail to learn anything from Zap's film. It is clear as day unless you are a kooky statist.

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

Yuh huh. So now you're saying it depends on what the definition of "I" is.

Oh lookie here foolish one.

Absolute video evidence from Zapruder that his head moved forward before the back and to the left movement.

proves you wrong you are done

 

[Soupnazi630]

AFTER a forward movement which destroys your illogical theory.,

The film proves you wrong it is you failing to learn after I destroyed you on other threads.

I've never even heard of you before today Dippy.

And no, not "after a forward movement". The only forward movement here is the dump you just took on your own credibility.

I never said you heard of me or should have.

Dead wrong little boy the back and to the left movement clearly and irrefutably happened after a slight forward movement

Fct visible to all and you proves you wrong

the forward movement was from the bullet that entered his throat...then the head shot from the front right sent him back and to the left.

Only a dupe would think otherwise....or a CIA plant, which you clearly are.

There was no entrance wound to his throat proving you wrong.

The head would not move at all from a wound below the head.

There are no CIA plants and the evidence proves you wrong and a liar

You must have watched the CIA approved Zap film. LMFAO!!!

Clearly he brings his hands up to clutch his throat (from the bullet entering his throat) and binding forward, he takes the head shot from the front right, which sends his brain and skull fragments to the rear...resulting in Jackie crawling on the trunk lid to get his skull...and the SS agent who jumped on the car covered in JFK's brains.


Must I educate you on everything?

There is no such video and i just posted the Zapruder film which proves you wrong.

His hands were moving in the classic Thorburn reaction which has been seen in many victims hundreds of times and is caused by a bullet to the back.

Brain and skull fragments went to the front AND rear AND sides as is typical.

You are the3 one being educated and pwned AGAIN