71 Years

[Unkotare]

Yes I do. That's why I have provided links, facts, and direct quotes from political and military leaders of the day. ..

Dude, a link to someone elses opinion is still an opinion, but you are free to believe whatever revisionist crap you like.

Hiroshima: Quotes


Ignored Japanese Peace Bids Plague U. S., West, with What Might Have Been (August 14, 1965)

.

 

[Theowl32]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

As highlighted by the baby on a bayonet in the picture below.

I do not shed one single tear.

 

[Unkotare]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

.......

So you're saying the use of the atomic bombs was an act of revenge on behalf of China? Can you support that claim with evidence?

 

[Theowl32]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

.......

So you're saying the use of the atomic bombs was an act of revenge on behalf of China? Can you support that claim with evidence?

They reaped exactly what they had coming to them. They asked for the thunder and they got it. Their false worship and their wicked ways. They got precisely what was coming to them.

Their atrocities are very well documented.

 

[Unkotare]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

.......

So you're saying the use of the atomic bombs was an act of revenge on behalf of China? Can you support that claim with evidence?

They reaped exactly what they had coming to them. They asked for the thunder and they got it. Their false worship and their wicked ways. They got precisely what was coming to them.

Their atrocities are very well documented.

I asked you a question.

 

[Theowl32]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

.......

So you're saying the use of the atomic bombs was an act of revenge on behalf of China? Can you support that claim with evidence?

They reaped exactly what they had coming to them. They asked for the thunder and they got it. Their false worship and their wicked ways. They got precisely what was coming to them.

Their atrocities are very well documented.

I asked you a question.

And I answered your fucking question

 

[Unkotare]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

.......

So you're saying the use of the atomic bombs was an act of revenge on behalf of China? Can you support that claim with evidence?

They reaped exactly what they had coming to them. They asked for the thunder and they got it. Their false worship and their wicked ways. They got precisely what was coming to them.

Their atrocities are very well documented.

I asked you a question.

And I answered your fucking question

You most certainly did not.

 

[Unkotare]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

.......

So you're saying the use of the atomic bombs was an act of revenge on behalf of China? Can you support that claim with evidence?

Yes or no?

 

[CultureCitizen]

We're still giving out Purple Heart medals made for the expected casualties that we would have suffered in an invasion of Japan. Think about that for a moment, the sheer number of killed and wounded we've suffered in Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Mogadishu, Iraq, Afghanistan, and all the other battles along we way and with all those casualties, we've still not exceeded the number of casualties from one expected WW2 campaign.

So even assuming the first bomb was necesary... the second bomb was pure sadism.

 

[xband]

Fucking japs reaped the whirlwind for their long list of atrocities leading up to WWII.

As highlighted by the baby on a bayonet in the picture below.

I do not shed one single tear.

There is truth in that picture. My girlfriend was from the Philippines and her mom said that Japanese soldiers would toss up babies and catch them on bayonets. I was in the Navy and just came from the gunline in Vietnam and went to Sake Town in Sasebo that is not too far from Hiroshima. I saw a neon sign of a battleship and went in. The walls were painted with Japanese ships and airplanes shooting up American ships. I turned around and started to walk out when I was grabbed by both arms and insisted that I sit at their low table on rice mats and shoes off. Free sake and food and found out it was a Japanese Officer VFW, for lack of a better term. We all had a good time telling war stories.

 

[Theowl32]

We're still giving out Purple Heart medals made for the expected casualties that we would have suffered in an invasion of Japan. Think about that for a moment, the sheer number of killed and wounded we've suffered in Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Mogadishu, Iraq, Afghanistan, and all the other battles along we way and with all those casualties, we've still not exceeded the number of casualties from one expected WW2 campaign.

So even assuming the first bomb was necesary... the second bomb was pure sadism.

Actually it was not. Let me give you the three choices Truman actually had along with the timeline of events.

In February of 1945 the USSR and US officially started the COLD WAR after the Yalta Conference. Look it up.

USSR showed they had no desire to be allies and Stalin was looking into expanding their territory and expanding communism. They began to encroach into the middle east and they had a desire to take over the trade routes of the middle east.

Stalin was declaring his desire to take over the region, even after the Potsdam Conferences in July of 1945.

August 8th, the day before Nagasaki, the USSR had declared war on Japan. On August 9th Nagasaki bomb dropped. USSR backs off and Japan surrenders.

So, if you are Truman, here are the three choices.

1. Allow Stalin to take over the region, allow Japan to surrender to the USSR where Japan through propaganda could save face instead of a humiliating surrender to the US. How would that play out with the American people after the years of the Pacific campaign that cost thousands of American lives, where the USSR did not commit anything to that campaign?

2. Declare war on the USSR like Patton wanted. Logistically it made some sense as Patton said. The US hardware was already there. The US war factories were in good working order. The USSR were very weary after a long drawn out battle with Hitler. However, they were still formidable. Stalin had moved most of their factories east and far away from Hitler's reach. They had a formidable airforce and navy. A war with the USSR would have been devastating and the US would have had to go it alone. The UK would not have joined us. It would have been an almost impossible to sell to the American people.

3. Drop the bombs to force the USSR (Stalin) to back off, or else.

Those are the choices. Explain why the USSR declared war after Hiroshima on August 8th and then backed off after the second bomb was dropped.

 

[xband]

We're still giving out Purple Heart medals made for the expected casualties that we would have suffered in an invasion of Japan. Think about that for a moment, the sheer number of killed and wounded we've suffered in Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Mogadishu, Iraq, Afghanistan, and all the other battles along we way and with all those casualties, we've still not exceeded the number of casualties from one expected WW2 campaign.

So even assuming the first bomb was necesary... the second bomb was pure sadism.

Actually it was not. Let me give you the three choices Truman actually had along with the timeline of events.

In February of 1945 the USSR and US officially started the COLD WAR after the Yalta Conference. Look it up.

USSR showed they had no desire to be allies and Stalin was looking into expanding their territory and expanding communism. They began to encroach into the middle east and they had a desire to take over the trade routes of the middle east.

Stalin was declaring his desire to take over the region, even after the Potsdam Conferences in July of 1945.

August 8th, the day before Nagasaki, the USSR had declared war on Japan. On August 9th Nagasaki bomb dropped. USSR backs off and Japan surrenders.

So, if you are Truman, here are the three choices.

1. Allow Stalin to take over the region, allow Japan to surrender to the USSR where Japan through propaganda could save face instead of a humiliating surrender to the US. How would that play out with the American people after the years of the Pacific campaign that cost thousands of American lives, where the USSR did not commit anything to that campaign?

2. Declare war on the USSR like Patton wanted. Logistically it made some sense as Patton said. The US hardware was already there. The US war factories were in good working order. The USSR were very weary after a long drawn out battle with Hitler. However, they were still formidable. Stalin had moved most of their factories east and far away from Hitler's reach. They had a formidable airforce and navy. A war with the USSR would have been devastating and the US would have had to go it alone. The UK would not have joined us. It would have been an almost impossible to sell to the American people.

3. Drop the bombs to force the USSR (Stalin) to back off, or else.

Those are the choices. Explain why the USSR declared war after Hiroshima on August 8th and then backed off after the second bomb was dropped.

I bet that I am the only one on the board who has shook hands with Harry Truman in his private office inside the Truman Library. The year was 1963 when I was 12 years old. Harry Truman was a short man that I did not know and I was a little taller than him that he pointed out. Harry Truman told me to study History.

 

[Vastator]

After reading the entirety of this thread; I am shocked to see how many people fail to grasp the concept of "Unrestricted Warfare". In warfare, there is no moral high ground. Only victory, or defeat. War means shaking off the shackles of civility; and using any means one can conceive of to implement domination over your enemies.

 

[Theowl32]

After reading the entirety of this thread; I am shocked to see how many people fail to grasp the concept of "Unrestricted Warfare". In warfare, there is no moral high ground. Only victory, or defeat. War means shaking off the shackles of civility; and using any means one can conceive of to implement domination over your enemies.

If you are paying attention (not even that close of attention) you will notice the left AROUND THE WORLD only hold America to the lofty ideals of the Geneva convention.

Notice how there is only feigned outrage over what the torturers and murderers of isis (or whatever stink smelly terror group that consists mainly of brown colored people) are doing around the world. Really not much as far as hype. Throwing gays off of rooftops for being gay, stoning women for showing skin or being raped, burning prisoners alive, burying children alive, systematically killing Christians (they actually love that), boiling prisoners in hot oil to death, or hijacking passenger airliners and using those planes with ALL of those civilians as missiles. In fact they blame America (of course they do) for those actions.

Oh, but when America waterboards (not torture) 5 of those stink apes who planned those 911 attacks, all of a sudden the entire world reaction is....

In fact they still try their best to under report or obfuscate titles. Like when that "truck" killed all of those people in France.

It is not just this country.

 

[Unkotare]

..... I was in the Navy and just came from the gunline in Vietnam and went to Sake Town in Sasebo that is not too far from Hiroshima. I saw a neon sign of a battleship and went in. The walls were painted with Japanese ships and airplanes shooting up American ships. I turned around and started to walk out when I was grabbed by both arms and insisted that I sit at their low table on rice mats and shoes off. Free sake and food and found out it was a Japanese Officer VFW, for lack of a better term. We all had a good time telling war stories.

That was the worst fake story written here in a long time.

 

[Theowl32]

Unkotare
unkotare \ woon-ko-ta-re \ , noun;

Japanese. Roughly translated as dripping poop. This word is used to describe a pornographic genre commonly known as Scat.
"Hey Bro checkout this sweet unkotare video I found... it is super kawaii-desu"

 

[Divine Wind]

...Those are the choices. Explain why the USSR declared war after Hiroshima on August 8th and then backed off after the second bomb was dropped.

1) The Soviets didn't back off, they took the Sakhalin islands on 11AUG45. Sakhalin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2) Like Nazi scientists, the Japanese may have prefered submission to the Americans rather than domination by the Soviets; ergo just another reason to surrender quickly.

 

[Unkotare]

.... (or whatever stink smelly terror group that consists mainly of brown colored people) .... those stink apes .....

And now we see the real motivation behind your commenting here at all.

 

[Theowl32]

.... (or whatever stink smelly terror group that consists mainly of brown colored people) .... those stink apes .....

And now we see the real motivation behind your commenting here at all.

Took you long enough you poop dripping pervert.

 

[Unkotare]

After reading the entirety of this thread; I am shocked to see how many people fail to grasp the concept of "Unrestricted Warfare". In warfare, there is no moral high ground. Only victory, or defeat. War means shaking off the shackles of civility; and using any means one can conceive of to implement domination over your enemies.

So, when we began military action in Afghanistan in 2001, you think we should have targeted schools and hospital specifically "to implement domination"? Is that what you think America should be?