The2ndAmendment
Gold Member
Should an exception to the 8th Amendment be added for Mass Murderers who murder innocent civilians while in public, subjecting them to excruciating torture outdoors, so that the public (victim) can watch?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once again you have to define "torture". Some would say a day watching CNN propaganda would be considered torture.
Should an exception to the 8th Amendment be added for Mass Murderers who murder innocent civilians while in public, subjecting them to excruciating torture outdoors, so that the public (victim) can watch?
Torture is unconstitutional
No. Clearly that is cruel and unusual punish.
Torture is unconstitutional
So apply it to all murderers. Then it won't be unusual. Just cruel.No. Clearly that is cruel and unusual punish.
Put them in solitary confinement and keep them alive as long as you can.
Lol. You can’t take the crazies guns away because of the 2nd , but let’s juts tear up the 8th for fun!
Put them in solitary confinement and keep them alive as long as you can.
Under our present system, permanent solitary could qualify as cruel and unusual punishment.No. Clearly that is cruel and unusual punish.
Put them in solitary confinement and keep them alive as long as you can.
I think that families of the murdered victims, should be allowed to volunteer to beat the murderer to death with baseball bats, avoiding the skull until the last, after all, you want him/her conscious for most of it. There's very little satisfaction when a family member of a victim, sees the murderer "fall asleep" at the time of his/her execution. The family members have a tendency to complain that it "seemed" as though the criminal just fell asleep and that it was "too good for him/her."Should an exception to the 8th Amendment be added for Mass Murderers who murder innocent civilians while in public, subjecting them to excruciating torture outdoors, so that the public (victim) can watch?
Countries with strong gun control don't have mass killing problems. I'd rather we limit the killings.Lol. You can’t take the crazies guns away because of the 2nd , but let’s juts tear up the 8th for fun!
You don't who is or isn't crazy before they become a criminal, they also tend to use explosives, cars, machetes and other weapons besides firearms, and only firearms will suffice to stop these dangerous people.
We know who deserves it after they commit mass murder.
There are fewer guns per person in El Salvador, too.Countries with strong gun control don't have mass killing problems. I'd rather we limit the killings.Lol. You can’t take the crazies guns away because of the 2nd , but let’s juts tear up the 8th for fun!
You don't who is or isn't crazy before they become a criminal, they also tend to use explosives, cars, machetes and other weapons besides firearms, and only firearms will suffice to stop these dangerous people.
We know who deserves it after they commit mass murder.
Countries with strong gun control don't have mass killing problems. I'd rather we limit the killings.Lol. You can’t take the crazies guns away because of the 2nd , but let’s juts tear up the 8th for fun!
You don't who is or isn't crazy before they become a criminal, they also tend to use explosives, cars, machetes and other weapons besides firearms, and only firearms will suffice to stop these dangerous people.
We know who deserves it after they commit mass murder.
Countries with strong gun control don't have mass killing problems. I'd rather we limit the killings.Lol. You can’t take the crazies guns away because of the 2nd , but let’s juts tear up the 8th for fun!
You don't who is or isn't crazy before they become a criminal, they also tend to use explosives, cars, machetes and other weapons besides firearms, and only firearms will suffice to stop these dangerous people.
We know who deserves it after they commit mass murder.