Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ahww how cute...then why was it presented at all? since it does not support the allegations in this thread....or do just love to hear yourself type?It wasn't presented as "proof that 911 was an inside job", daws. Are you having trouble following the thread today?
If you're not capable of reading the last 2 pages of this thread without adult supervision and help, maybe you should go back to your sandbox...
I believe it was presented as proof that the government lies to us.....
Guess what, True story, I once had a mission that took me to Groom lake..... You know what I saw while i was there? Neither do I..... (The second part was the government lying to you.......)
ahww how cute...then why was it presented at all? since it does not support the allegations in this thread....or do just love to hear yourself type?
If you're not capable of reading the last 2 pages of this thread without adult supervision and help, maybe you should go back to your sandbox...
but it's not an answer!
it's the same conspiracy shit you ass hats have been pulling out of your collective ass since Kennedy.
we all know the govenment lies ...that does not prove "they" lied about 911.
so until you have actual evidence corroborating your myth...
it's just that. a myth.
Another useless and illogical argument from a Ron Paul nutter! I will point out I am against the assault weapons ban, so I am right of center on this issue. However, if you are going to make a argument against gun control make a good one.
Guns are made for one purpose - that is to harm or kill the target you are shooting at. Their main purpose is to end life (whether it be a human or animal)! Yes many times it's in self-defense and of course they can be for recreational purposes like ski shooting or target practice. But the main purpose remains the same. Train, planes or automobiles are not made to kill people. There primary purpose is transportation, and quicker transportation then previous methods. To use these argument that all these modes of transportation either directly or indirectly cause death and we don't ban them as your argument against gun control is hopelessly weak at best!
Stick to better arguments!
Another useless and illogical argument from a Ron Paul nutter! I will point out I am against the assault weapons ban, so I am right of center on this issue. However, if you are going to make a argument against gun control make a good one.
Guns are made for one purpose - that is to harm or kill the target you are shooting at. Their main purpose is to end life (whether it be a human or animal)! Yes many times it's in self-defense and of course they can be for recreational purposes like ski shooting or target practice. But the main purpose remains the same. Train, planes or automobiles are not made to kill people. There primary purpose is transportation, and quicker transportation then previous methods. To use these argument that all these modes of transportation either directly or indirectly cause death and we don't ban them as your argument against gun control is hopelessly weak at best!
Stick to better arguments!
Well, not sure we're debating the Gun-Control issue on this thread. But i'm sure you'll find many other threads on that subject. And i'm also not sure what you mean by "Ron Paul nutter." The man is the only Politician even worth listening to at this point. He's anything but a "Nutter."
then why was it presented at all? since it does not support the allegations in this thread....or do just love to hear yourself type?It wasn't presented as "proof that 911 was an inside job", daws. Are you having trouble following the thread today?
If you're not capable of reading the last 2 pages of this thread without adult supervision and help, maybe you should go back to your sandbox...
Gee I wonder what Ron Paul thinks of your nutcase theories?
Another useless and illogical argument from a Ron Paul nutter! I will point out I am against the assault weapons ban, so I am right of center on this issue. However, if you are going to make a argument against gun control make a good one.
Guns are made for one purpose - that is to harm or kill the target you are shooting at. Their main purpose is to end life (whether it be a human or animal)! Yes many times it's in self-defense and of course they can be for recreational purposes like ski shooting or target practice. But the main purpose remains the same. Train, planes or automobiles are not made to kill people. There primary purpose is transportation, and quicker transportation then previous methods. To use these argument that all these modes of transportation either directly or indirectly cause death and we don't ban them as your argument against gun control is hopelessly weak at best!
Stick to better arguments!
Well, not sure we're debating the Gun-Control issue on this thread. But i'm sure you'll find many other threads on that subject. And i'm also not sure what you mean by "Ron Paul nutter." The man is the only Politician even worth listening to at this point. He's anything but a "Nutter."
That Ghook troll for you.He obviously has been brainwashed by these paid agent trolls Dawgshit and Moron In The Hat-the kid that has an obsession with me and will post IMMEDIATELY within minutes after I make this post.Ghook troll has never even listened to him obviously otherwise he would know he is the only one that belives in the constitution which is why troll agent Moron In The hat used to try and slander him all the time.thats what his handlers paid him to do.
It was his supporters that probably cost him many many votes....
so what! it's no proof that 911 was an inside job.......you can always dream....Your original contention was that it was never considered. THAT is a lie. It came from the JCS and was presented to SecDef.
Bet your ASS it was 'considered'...
It wasn't presented as "proof that 911 was an inside job", daws. Are you having trouble following the thread today?
Another useless and illogical argument from a Ron Paul nutter! I will point out I am against the assault weapons ban, so I am right of center on this issue. However, if you are going to make a argument against gun control make a good one.
Guns are made for one purpose - that is to harm or kill the target you are shooting at. Their main purpose is to end life (whether it be a human or animal)! Yes many times it's in self-defense and of course they can be for recreational purposes like ski shooting or target practice. But the main purpose remains the same. Train, planes or automobiles are not made to kill people. There primary purpose is transportation, and quicker transportation then previous methods. To use these argument that all these modes of transportation either directly or indirectly cause death and we don't ban them as your argument against gun control is hopelessly weak at best!
Stick to better arguments!
Well, not sure we're debating the Gun-Control issue on this thread. But i'm sure you'll find many other threads on that subject. And i'm also not sure what you mean by "Ron Paul nutter." The man is the only Politician even worth listening to at this point. He's anything but a "Nutter."
so what! it's no proof that 911 was an inside job.......you can always dream....
It wasn't presented as "proof that 911 was an inside job", daws. Are you having trouble following the thread today?
I gotta tell ya, Guy, you seem pretty normal but you have a 9/11 troll following you around lickin' your balls. Now I know that can be entertaining but is it really who you wanna be? I mean, if I had him between my legs I'd rethink my positions. Just sayin'.
It wasn't presented as "proof that 911 was an inside job", daws. Are you having trouble following the thread today?
I gotta tell ya, Guy, you seem pretty normal but you have a 9/11 troll following you around lickin' your balls. Now I know that can be entertaining but is it really who you wanna be? I mean, if I had him between my legs I'd rethink my positions. Just sayin'.
I need to rethink MY positions?
Based on someone else's opinion?
Sorry, but I don't do 'dishonesty'.
I gotta tell ya, Guy, you seem pretty normal but you have a 9/11 troll following you around lickin' your balls. Now I know that can be entertaining but is it really who you wanna be? I mean, if I had him between my legs I'd rethink my positions. Just sayin'.
I need to rethink MY positions?
Based on someone else's opinion?
Sorry, but I don't do 'dishonesty'.
Sorry, but yes you do........
Another useless and illogical argument from a Ron Paul nutter! I will point out I am against the assault weapons ban, so I am right of center on this issue. However, if you are going to make a argument against gun control make a good one.
Guns are made for one purpose - that is to harm or kill the target you are shooting at. Their main purpose is to end life (whether it be a human or animal)! Yes many times it's in self-defense and of course they can be for recreational purposes like ski shooting or target practice. But the main purpose remains the same. Train, planes or automobiles are not made to kill people. There primary purpose is transportation, and quicker transportation then previous methods. To use these argument that all these modes of transportation either directly or indirectly cause death and we don't ban them as your argument against gun control is hopelessly weak at best!
Stick to better arguments!
Well, not sure we're debating the Gun-Control issue on this thread. But i'm sure you'll find many other threads on that subject. And i'm also not sure what you mean by "Ron Paul nutter." The man is the only Politician even worth listening to at this point. He's anything but a "Nutter."
I'm pretty sure that is what G meant by a "Nutter" ... someone who believes Paul is the only politician worth listening to.
I need to rethink MY positions?
Based on someone else's opinion?
Sorry, but I don't do 'dishonesty'.
Sorry, but yes you do........
Link?
