daws101
Diamond Member
- Jul 7, 2011
- 41,526
- 3,122
heidner's analysis is just more specious speculation ..if he had anything other than assumptions then his shit might be worth a second look..I'm the OP of this thread. [...]
Notice that none of the debunkers have anything to say about Heidner's analysis of the potential motives of those who actually benefited from these targeted attacks (which was referenced in the video in the original post).
But then, why dwell on things like possible motives and the question, "Cui bono?", when you can simply keep harping on the crusty but trusty talking points put out by the official coverup effort?