I just want to point out that the estimates of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity and Transient Climate Response (ECS and TCR) have ALWAYS included the logarithmic relationship between CO2 levels and temperature. This gets brought up repeatedly as if the world's scientists were unaware or were hiding facts, but that is simply not true.A few errors here ... first and foremost, science does predict more CO2 effects temperature less ... both in Classical Physics' Oldham logarithmic relationship to Modern Physics' Stefan-Boltzmann Law ... and this is clearly stated in the IPCC report's predictions ... Foxfyre is correct, another degree of warming is all science expects (IPCC AR5 1WG Fig 12-5 and associated text) ... no matter how much carbon dioxide man-kind emits to the atmosphere ...
It is unreasonable to replace piston-engined passenger rigs with EVs ... it's the manufacturing of these 3 or 4 ton vehicles that's destroying our environment ... and then burn coal to produce the electricity ... blind stupid ... we removing 90% of passenger vehicles, not replacing, folks can take the bus or bike their lazy asses to work ...
The Titanic hit North Atlantic ice and sank ... coral reefs are dying due to titanium oxide in sunscreen ... the reefs humans don't visit are perfectly healthy right now ... and without ice, goods can be shipped at a cheaper cost through the Northwest Passage ... so burn tires wil ya'? ...
Additionally, the lifetime net carbon footprint of EVs shows them to reduce carbon emissions by large margins. This bugaboo that any manufacturing required to mitigate CO2 emisisons overwhelms the savings is a giant crock of shit.