Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What high capacity mags?Ban high capacity magazines......nobody needs them
Reloads are risky in home defense situations. We need stansard mags, minimum. 30 rounds are standard.
Everything else you list is fine if you can enforce it.
Yo going to have 30 people invading your home?
We should put him in a plane and make him fly 100 miles with just enough fuel for 100 miles (and only if flown with perfect efficiency). He's OK if we die if we don't have 100% accuracy, so he should be OK if he dies because he fails to fly a plane with 100% efficiency.What high capacity mags?Ban high capacity magazines......nobody needs them
Reloads are risky in home defense situations. We need stansard mags, minimum. 30 rounds are standard.
Everything else you list is fine if you can enforce it.
Yo going to have 30 people invading your home?
Nope....but having to change a 10 round magazine while you are injured simply because an asshat doesn't like you having more than 10 bullets is just stupid...law abiding citizens need as much ammo during an attack as they can carry......
Absolutely. After all, they're inanimate.Then, full-auto machine guns. No need for the ban or restriction, right?
Where guns and nukes are not inanimate?It's possible that the tooth fairy is a real person, and possible that he/she/it will get elected president. Should we worry about that possibility?
Now, let's come back to the real world.
Which is why talk of them being inanimate is echo chamber bullshit.Both require a human to activate.
The argument is that guns don't kill people as they are inanimate. As are nukes. I'm pleased to see you've finally seen the inanimate argument is bullshit, you dumb fuck rightard. How long has it taken you?WHICH ARE FUCKING IRRELEVANT, YOU RETARD!!!
Where they have voting rights and you don't.Where guns and nukes are not inanimate?
I know you think you made a point, but you didn't.The argument is that guns don't kill people as they are inanimate. I'm pleased to see you've finally seen that argument is bullshit, you dumb fuck rightard. How long has it taken you?
Which is why talk of them being inanimate is echo chamber bullshit.Both require a human to activate.
I do believe you're saying it is okay for a private citizen to own devices that can take out schools or crowds. That you're happy to pay the cost of your freedoms in other people's lives is why you have the high rate of mass shootings you do.Nobody is saying it is OK for a private citizen to own a device that could take out entire regions of a country.
I understand that logic and the meaning of words bounce off rightards.I know you think you made a point, but you didn't.
They're like nukes, objects that need to be regulated.I said they require a HUMAN to activate. No? So, what are they if guns aren't inanimate objects? Do they have will, and intent. Are they able to operate by themselves?
They're like nukes, objects that need to be regulated.
Not when the argument is made that guns are inanimate objects so can't/don't need to be regulated.Good job making your argument about inanimate objects. Nobody gives a rat fuck. But, pat yourself on the ass.
The are not highly regulated in America. Your sacred 2nd sees to that.They ARE regulated. Highly regulated. But they are NOTHING like nukes.
The are not highly regulated in America. Your sacred 2nd sees to that.
I can't see how you can't accept that.
The same blockage that accepts citizens easily owning devices that can massacre schools or crowds I guess.
They are like nukes in that they are inanimate objects that are weapons.
They don't. Not because they are inanimate, but because fuck you, it is an inalienable right. You are fucking over millions to control the one, which is unlikely to be effective.Not when the argument is made that guns are inanimate objects so can't/don't need to be regulated
The are not highly regulated in America. Your sacred 2nd sees to that.They ARE regulated. Highly regulated. But they are NOTHING like nukes.
I can't see how you can't accept that.
The same blockage that accepts citizens easily owning devices that can massacre schools or crowds I guess.
They are like nukes in that they are inanimate objects that are weapons.
I do believe you're saying it is okay for a private citizen to own devices that can take out schools or crowds. That you're happy to pay the cost of your freedoms in other people's lives is why you have the high rate of mass shootings you do.Nobody is saying it is OK for a private citizen to own a device that could take out entire regions of a country.
But the more shots you can get off, the more kills you are capable ofAnybody who is not a total retard knows that real CQB situations rarely result in one shot, one kill ratios.What high capacity mags?Ban high capacity magazines......nobody needs them
Reloads are risky in home defense situations. We need stansard mags, minimum. 30 rounds are standard.
Everything else you list is fine if you can enforce it.
Yo going to have 30 people invading your home?
